Vic said:
Horrible. :lol
Vic said:
Aristotlekh said:UK, no contest, everybody agrees, we can all go home.
AstroLad said:Sorry, but by the looks of that picture some fat British dude definitely doesn't meet the idea of "Michael Scott" and what makes him so great.
Steppenwolf said:The US version has the better characters compared to the original imo. Thats why its better. It's possible to care about most of them while in the brit version only 1-2 of them are sympathic or at least interesting enough.
Chairman Yang said:Requesting English subtitled versions of the German and French shows
Tsubaki said:It sounds like your response is in all seriousness.
LCfiner said:It was not. Astrolad is having a laugh.
woodchuck said:with that said, i havent watched the office season 4 since there's no karen. just the fact karen was in the US version means the US one is better.
woodchuck said:with that said, i havent watched the office season 4 since there's no karen. just the fact karen was in the US version means the US one is better.
Wes said:
Fifty said:Are you being serious? You watched the show for 3 seasons..they introduce the character of Karen..and once she leaves the show, you stop watching entirely? That's dedication to a character..
Skiptastic said:I will say this for the American version over the British version:
They never once showed why someone would ever put David Brent in a position of power. They never show him being good at his job. He just seems completely incompetent. Which may be the satire, that someone could get to that level of management with no ability to perform his job. Plus, sometimes I can't watch the show because it gets to Curb Your Enthusiasm levels of awkwardness that is painful to watch for me. Probably because I'm a terribly awkward person at times myself and have a physical painfulness when in awkward situations.
woodchuck said:well, that settles it. if Absinthe likes the UK version more, the US version must be better
Absinthe said:It's called an opinion. If you want something definitive then piss off.
Blablurn said:
Skiptastic said:I will say this for the American version over the British version:
They never once showed why someone would ever put David Brent in a position of power. They never show him being good at his job. He just seems completely incompetent. Which may be the satire, that someone could get to that level of management with no ability to perform his job.
kame-sennin said:Also, the answer to this thread is The Office UK, obviously.
omg rite said::lol You never change.
Absinthe said:Whatever.
LM4sure said:US version has some pretty terrible writing.
This ranking is spot on.alr1ghtstart said:Season 2 of the US version is superior to all of them.
S2 US > S1 UK > S2 UK > S3 US > S4 US >>>>>>>>>>>>>> S1 US
The difference being, and this ain't a jab at either version, is that the UK version only lasted 12 episodes plus the Christmas Special - as it is with the majority of UK shows. US shows just outlive their welcome more often than not, but i admire the US writers ability to continually derive humour from and put new spins on somewhat stale plots. The US version is more ensemble driven than the UK version ever was, and i think that's what sets it apart and in many ways makes it preferable to me.LM4sure said:UK version is far superior to US version. US version has some pretty terrible writing. How come there is some other event every week, be it diversity day, or the fun run day, or booze cruise day, or sensitivity awareness day, etc. All these lame events really bog the show down. The UK version thrived on its writing.
omg riteomg rite said::lol
LM4sure said:US version has some pretty terrible writing.
LM4sure said:UK version is far superior to US version. US version has some pretty terrible writing. How come there is some other event every week, be it diversity day, or the fun run day, or booze cruise day, or sensitivity awareness day, etc. All these lame events really bog the show down. The UK version thrived on its writing.
And Michael Scott is a douchebag. David Brent was a loveable loser. Michael is just a scumbag. An immature attention whore. Can't stand the guy some times, such as the time he got on the forklift and knocked all that shit over. Why the hell did he do that? What a bitch!
i'm doneknicks said:Haha, Michael Scott is so stupid, that's what makes it hilarious. His lines are hysterical. His emotions are so humorous. Everything he does in the show makes me crack up.
LM4sure said:UK version is far superior to US version. US version has some pretty terrible writing. How come there is some other event every week, be it diversity day, or the fun run day, or booze cruise day, or sensitivity awareness day, etc. All these lame events really bog the show down. The UK version thrived on its writing.
And Michael Scott is a douchebag. David Brent was a loveable loser. Michael is just a scumbag. An immature attention whore. Can't stand the guy some times, such as the time he got on the forklift and knocked all that shit over. Why the hell did he do that? What a bitch!
Clearly there has been a decline in quality, but that is some strong hyperbole. You can't seriously mean that it's become worse than the comedies that have laugh tracks like Two and a Half Men, Big Bang Theory, Disney shit, or any show about a dumb dad, hot mom, and smartass kids.Ford Prefect said:UK version is one of the best TV shows ever. US version had a great second season, but has become one of the worst, most lazily-written written shows I've ever seen.
:lolwoodchuck said:well, that settles it. if Absinthe likes the UK version more, the US version must be better
The Office is committing the bigger offense, because at one time it was good. Those other shows have always been bad. But yes, I do think that The Office is objectively just as bad, just in a less-mainstream, laughtrack-less way. It tries some edgier types of humor, but it fails just as hard as those shows do.a Master Ninja said:Clearly there has been a decline in quality, but that is some strong hyperbole. You can't seriously mean that it's become worse than the comedies that have laugh tracks like Two and a Half Men, Big Bang Theory, Disney shit, or any show about a dumb dad, hot mom, and smartass kids.
Skiptastic said:I will say this for the American version over the British version:
They never once showed why someone would ever put David Brent in a position of power. They never show him being good at his job. He just seems completely incompetent. Which may be the satire, that someone could get to that level of management with no ability to perform his job. Plus, sometimes I can't watch the show because it gets to Curb Your Enthusiasm levels of awkwardness that is painful to watch for me. Probably because I'm a terribly awkward person at times myself and have a physical painfulness when in awkward situations.
Michael Scott, while insane and stupid and petty at times, has shown that he actually can sell things and get along with people (when he gets the school client at Chili's, when he's hanging out with the telemarketers talking about movies). In the "Survivor Man" episode, he showed why not all of his ideas are bad and that he can actually be insightful at times when he was talking with Jim. The frustration comes in the fact that those moments are few and far between.
So while I think the original is perfect in its complete and utter brutal satire, I do think the American version has some qualities that are better than the UK version.
bananabread said:What about at the end of the entire series whenGareth takes over as the new manager after Tim stays in his rut and turns down the offer?
I always assumed David got his job in the same way.
The way they leave you knowing that the whole cycle is going to repeat made it one of the most depressing endings to a series I've ever seen.
I agree, but only because the US doesn't star Ricky "fat obnoxious wanker who is as funny as Anthrax" Gervais.Alpha_eX said:The US one for sure, much better than the original.