John Dunbar said:They're on the same side of the draw. They can only meet in the Semi.
Yeah, I knew that. I'm an idiot. Meant to say semis. And it would be cool to see Tsonga/Nadal (not Murray) in the final.
John Dunbar said:They're on the same side of the draw. They can only meet in the Semi.
They've played 3 times -- twice on clay and once on hardcourt. I'll let you guess the head to head record cause it's pretty easy to figure out.Nihilism said:It would be cool to see Verdasco and Fed in the finals. Not sure how many times they've played. Seems like it would maybe be interesting.
Manics said:They've played 3 times -- twice on clay and once on hardcourt. I'll let you guess the head to head record cause it's pretty easy to figure out.
Well, Verdasco hasn't won a set off Federer in 3 meetings, so the Joke is your man.Nihilism said:Well, bummer. I really don't have anything against Fed, but I just don't want him to win again. I don't know if Djokovic or Verdasco will challenge him more. This is, of course, assuming that Djo wins tonight.
Oh I know, but he does have the one thing over Verdasco and that's a victory against Federer in a slam (albeit a mono inflicted Fed)agrajag said:You cannot count on the Joke. :lol
Nihilism said:Also, I'm watching on channelsurfing.net on my computer. Is this being aired on TV in the states?
agrajag said:Wow, Wozniacki sucks.
agrajag said:Wow, Wozniacki sucks.
Wes said:You watch your mouth.
Greg said:I hate watching tennis because they rarely use that lower camera angle... I never get a feel for the game with the camera so high all the time.
Damnit, no, I didn't mean that! :lolForzaItalia said:A fellow perv....welcome.
Speevy said:Both of these players are strong-willed.
Oudin would definitely do better against Wozniacki.
Wes said:WOZNIACKI!!!! <3
Speevy said:Federer's last opponent played better than this.
unomas said:I agree with some of your points, but there is a huge difference between Serena and Sharapova, one of them being that regardless of her injury Sharapova never had a serve anywhere near the quality of Serena's pre injury included.
Another is that her career is over at 22, I don't buy it, and Masha certainly doesn't buy it. She changed her service motion to accomodate the shoulder, and she's also going for WAY more on her second serve than she should be, leading to the high number of doubles per match. I could get into the technical points of her "new" serve and explain why it's blatantly flawed, but that's pointless.
Serena is also willing to add to her game, in this US Open in particular working on adding a drop shot as well as working on her slice backhand in the last few years. No offense to Maria, but I can't remember the last time she attempted a slice, I just can't. So her one dimension was good enough to gather some slam titles, but the current WTA is a reflection of the limitations of her style and lack of variety. It's not just because of a shoulder issue that she no longer stands above her peers, it's also because they all play darn near the exact style and that's why the outcomes sans Serena are so unpredictable.
Pre injury Serena destroyed her in the Aussie final 6-1, 6-2 as well I believe in 2007. Injury or not, I'm not seeing her being capable of beating Serena on a consistant basis when Serena has the advantage in every department.
As far as Oudin, does she have anything that particularly stands out at 17? Heart and mental capacity, those will go a long long way, or at least they have during this fortnight. It's hard for me to take anything Jankovic says seriously, her remarks were more scathing probably because she had just lost to Oudin. Either way a fresh face is a welcome thing, and not a bad thing.
And yes, Monfils/Nadal should be good with Monfils beating Nadal indoors earlier this year, but Monfils didn't play much this summer because of his injury problems. The question is will Monfils play aggressive enough to take advantage of the court speed. If not, Gonzo has a good chance if he makes it through the next round.