I do find it hilarious how she even points people to a streaming porn site to watch them. Incredible.
For fuck's sake, don't be a dumbass and actually read it before you judge it. It's not bad, and I'm normally not a Patricia Hernandez fan.>kotaku
>clickbait title
>patricia hernandez
Yeah, no.
What's wrong with that?yea. I find it questionable shining a spotlight on it and saying "hey everyone look at this!".
Well, to be fair, while she says she finds it personally reprehensible, she never says it shouldn't exist or that the people engaged in it are bad people. I expected a much more lashing tone, but after she gets her own personal hangups out of the way, it's pretty even handed.
So, a new Elizabeth one is coming out, huh? Interesting.
![]()
I do like the sound of this though:
The scout is a signature of one of the animators, its a "little running gag" jokeAll of the films I've watched feature cameos by the Scout from Team Fortress 2—he often sneers and smirks in the background of certain sex scenes
That's where they should draw a line. Ken Levine spoke out about that. I don't see their fun in going against his best wishes.
Like how someone can be turned on by another person's pain, powerlessness, inflicting damage to another person, and literal rape. If I met someone in real life who were into that sort of thing, I'd think the person to be weird. That shit just doesn't sit well with me.
Is this Kotaku article an example of Streisand effect?
Like how someone can be turned on by another person's pain, powerlessness, inflicting damage to another person, the cries & screams, and literal rape. If I met someone in real life who were into that sort of thing, I'd think the person to be weird. That shit just doesn't sit well with me.
Also, calling it wrong wouldn't be the Streisand effect.I don't think they're trying to stop people from looking into the stuff themselves - the article takes a stance of 'this could be problematic, but porn is porn' - so it's not really a Steisand effect. They're not saying this stuff is morally wrong, rather they're just highlighting its' popularity.
IIRC it's one of the top fetishes among all genders. So yeah, probably a lot of upstanding folk that are into it when its purely simulated.
The scout is a signature of one of the animators, its a "little running gag" joke
example, someone will have sex and he'll show up mouse size, either person having intercourse might kick him off the screen... basically a gag character (for the most part)
Tecmo and team ninja dont want people modding DOA for the pc, people got in a fit over that , also Telling the internet to "not draw my character in a sexual manner" is the worst thing you can do.. hell Butch hartman(danny phantom, Fairly odd parents, that dog show) said the same thing.... and rule 34 took care of that.. Not saying its right, but its nature that if you tell someone NO, someone will go against it.
Also, calling it wrong wouldn't be the Streisand effect.
The Streisand effect is hiding information in a way that brings attention to it.
They better not start using Nintendo characters or Reggie will be knocking on their door asking for 30% of their income
Particle physics are also a big problem," Darkcrow said. "Getting realistic cumshots to work is nearly impossible due to the models not having collision detection.
Honestly, as a submissive that enjoys rape fantasies I find it rather hurtful and demoralizing how judgemental people are about this topic. I would never actually want someone to hurt me and force me in real life. I'm a kind person, I don't want anyone to ever be hurt and I'm very empathetic; rape in real life is the most scary, horrifying thing to me.
It's nothing more than a harmless fantasy; it's really just an extreme form of BDSM. People like being dominated or dominating. It's just a part of human sexuality, and it's ok. I wish people would understand that more.
So, a new Elizabeth one is coming out, huh? Interesting.
![]()
Can't the game publishers take the videos down for trademark infringement or is that not possible?
.The video game companies who own the rights to the characters who appear in StudioFOW's movies don't necessarily take kindly to erotic SFM, period. According to Darkcrow, StudioFOW has received a couple of takedown notices. One was supposedly for the Arena of Depravity trailer:
According to StudioFOW, the notice was issued by a firm that Activision hired to police their intellectual property. The problem, StudioFOW claims, was that the trailer was thought to depict the sort of sexual content that exceeds World of Warcraft's actual "T for Teen" rating. As the YouTube trailer, unlike the end product, is rather innocuous—there is no sex in it—StudioFOW says that they "laid out the case and [Activision] dropped it." I contacted the firm to ask for verification, but they did not respond in time for publication.
In another incident, StudioFOW claims that Valve issued a cease and desist order that demanded that StudioFOW take down an image of Team Fortress 2's "Scout" character from their website. Ironically, the Scout is one of the few characters in StudioFOW's films who remains clothed during sex scenes. We also contacted Valve to ask for verification, but they too did not respond in time for publication.
Can't the game publishers take the videos down for trademark infringement or is that not possible?
You don't know anyone in irl with those fantasies? I knew a very tame and prude girl who enjoyed that sort of thing. It spoke very little of her actual character, and only about the kind of erotic fiction she enjoyed. Rape fantasies are also very often vastly unrepresentative of rape as it happens in real life, there is play of dominance but almost never dangerously so. Was she weird? Kind of. I don't really know how popular these fantasies are. I know mine certainly aren't.
You still haven't said why they scare you. Weird? Shit, we're all guilty of some weird kink.
Shortly after the gruesome 17-minute porn was released on the web, it went viral—on the porn site XVideos alone, it's been watched 2,836,891 times.
People may get off on something that isnt real and see the real act and get disgusted.Interesting article , but a people that enjoys to see rape porn has serious issues.
I do not get why Square Enix do not sue them sine they are using their characters and even audio .
I don't get being turned on by rape. I know its one of those things where sex and power are dangerously intertwined (and its both, not just one or the other) and maybe there is some sort of alpha male caveman instinct there, but I just...
Having two daughters, I see things differently now, and if there ever was a time I could be amused by it, it's long gone.
there is a whole doujin market in japan that would be destroyed if that were possible. It isnt breaking any kind of laws (with specific exceptions since child depictations (like ellie from the last of us )are the questionable parts(those break laws in specific areas)
I thought it would be evident from my description why I found it scary. To put it simply: people who enjoy seeing other people hurt or harmed or being powerless, all in a non-consensual framework, frighten me. The ones doling out the rape and getting off on the pain of others scare me.
classic kotaku clickbait article
Thanks Toxi and sensui. Kind of strange they don't take legal action further than the initial threat. Surely they can trademark a characters likeness and prevent it but I suppose ultimately it isn't worth the legal costs. In a sick way it's kind of free advertising.
Trust me, it's not just a male fantasy, plenty of women get off on the fantasy of raping people too.
And 'fantasy' is the important part here. It's not really any different to the millions of brutal murders we fantasise about carrying out in most games.
There's as big of a difference between someone with privately held sadistic fetishes and an actual rapist, as there is between someone who plays GTA and an actual murderer.
So, a new Elizabeth one is coming out, huh? Interesting.
![]()
People who are into non-consensual sex or porn frighten me a lot, regardless of its fictional or virtual nature. Like really really frighten me :/
And this is all still done under a fantasy framework. For people who get off on this, it's easy for them to make the distinction. You are scared, which is fine, but I'd be wary of judging others. Watch any Kink video and they'll go on about this where the model should feel safe, be not pressured to continue anything, that this is what she wants, and the fantasy can be stopped at any time. That's live-action porn. This is animated porn so don't even need that disclaimer to separate fantasy from reality.I thought it would be evident from my description why I found it scary. To put it simply: people who enjoy seeing other people hurt or harmed or being powerless, all in a non-consensual framework, frighten me. The ones doling out the rape and getting off on the pain of others scare me.
You should email it to your boss instead.I'm guessing I probably shouldn't click this at work.
Rape fantasies are nothing new, but I've never heard the term "non-con" before. It's fine if it remains a fantasy and nothing more. On the subject of cultural attitudes, though, I feel like an abundance of that type of content is a symptom (or reflection) of elements in a culture rather than stuff like this necessarily contributing to it becoming a reality.