DidntKnowJack said:But ignoring the history lesson (we all knew about anyway) I thought the time was right to have a discussion of the PS2 as a console, it's library of games, and just an overall look back at the memories we associate with the system. After all, the sales of the PS2 are starting to finally wane, selling roughly 41 K units in North America in January 2010.
Dogenzaka said:It's library is so huge I'm still picking up games I missed![]()
Man said:Most refined technical achievement in it's ten years: God of War 2.
-COOLIO- said:playstations have a 10 year life cycle. it's run isnt over until oct 26th of this year.
OldJadedGamer said:But sales took off in Japan selling more in it's first 48 hours on retail shelves than the PS3 did in 9 months over there. The Japanese really loved this unit then more than half a year later, the rest of the US took hold.
Its.SecretBonusPoint said:Best console of all time. It's library is untouchable, and unless there is a one console future its unlikely we'll ever see such an incredible generation like it ever again.
KimiSan said:Its.
Shame it didn't have any good grammar games.
GatorBait said:I still haven't played Metal Gear Solid 3 yet. I'm going to start on it today.
chaostrophy said:I still recommend the PS2 as the best system to get, over any of the current gen ones, to anyone who's new to gaming and doesn't have any consoles. There just aren't any current gen games that can match the best games in its library.
The PS2 was awesome, and I really doubt its past its day yet, im sure there are still hundreds of people playing the things
DidntKnowJack said:Downhill Domination. Yet another racer, so I'll keep it brief. You rode down mountains on bicycles, against AI BMX'ers. Fast, furious, loads of fun. I want a sequel.
Dax01 said:The whole reason I bought a PS2 was to play Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy.
I still don't regret that decision to this day.
dak1dsk1 said:Being a closet-gamer/collector, I thought it would be interesting to hear/see how other people store their game-libraries. My private collection is outgrowing my ways of concealment, hence I have been considering trashing all cases and going purely sleeve.
Now, my #1 storing-goal is finding DVD-sized sleeves, which are reasonably priced. (No, 1$ pr. sleeve is not a fair price.) I'm thinking the kind that has room for both the DVD-inlay, as well as the possibility of forcing a manual inside. (not an ultimate condition.)
Any tips to where I could buy a huge amount of said DVD-sleeves, for a minimal price (incl. shipping) I live in Europe, so I would love to hear from Euro-collectors. (DVD or games)
chaostrophy said:I still recommend the PS2 as the best system to get, over any of the current gen ones, to anyone who's new to gaming and doesn't have any consoles. There just aren't any current gen games that can match the best games in its library.
I wouldn't put DVDs on my bookshelf...Manmademan said:get a bookshelf, put them in there among your DVDs.
No, PS2 had some issues with games in the beginning, just like PS3 did. PS3 will outlive the competition with its capabilities, so expect a 10-12 year lifecycle. There is plenty of room for an amazing library of games in that time.The Take Out Bandit said:No.
PS2 had an amazing stream of games and niche titles.
PS3 is just now reaching that point, three years later. PS2 will live on in legend, PS3 will be forgotten as soon as Sony craps out the PS4.
Majine said:No, PS2 had some issues with games in the beginning, just like PS3 did. PS3 will outlive the competition with its capabilities, so expect a 10-12 year lifecycle. There is plenty of room for an amazing library of games in that time.
dak1dsk1 said:I wouldn't put DVDs on my bookshelf...
No, PS2 had some issues with games in the beginning, just like PS3 did. PS3 will outlive the competition with its capabilities, so expect a 10-12 year lifecycle. There is plenty of room for an amazing library of games in that time.
Shig said:I'm kind of disappointed with how it's just being left to fade away at retail, instead of clinging on like PS1 did. There were all sorts of nutty $10 releases popping up in PS1's twilight, including some neat (if amateurish) late localizations, I'd have really liked to have seen the same happen with PS2. It's not like there's any shortage of games that would work decently at that price; Earth Defense Force 2, Michigan, Zombie vs. Ambulance, stuff like that.
'aight captain, thnx.Manmademan said:There's a "show us your gaming setup" thread on GAF where you can check out many, many solutions other GAFers have for dealing with absolutely massive gaming and console libraries
Oh wow you can find a bunch of old releases for under $10 now thank you so much I never knew.Manmademan said:eh? the ps2 is far stronger at this point in it's lifecycle than the PS1 was, and it's not hard at ALL to find new games at the $10 price point. I bought dynasty tactics 2 and rogue galaxy at $7 each, NEW- and one of those was 50% off. (since PS2 games were buy one get one 50% off at FYE.)
go to amazon. search for all PS2 games under 10 or 20 bucks or so. prepare to have your fingers fall off clicking through many, MANY pages of budget software.
Shig said:Yeah you don't really understand what I'm saying.
The last few years PS1 was still at major retailers, there were heaps and heaps of NEW ten dollar games being published in tandem. Stuff like Power Shovel, Mobile Light Force, Eternal Eyes, Blaster Master Blasting Again, Top Shop, etc.
Far from that. Famicom was produced till september 2003 (20th year). So they should produce PS2 till after 2020 to break the record.Snuggler said:They gotta be getting close to ending it, but it's extremely impressive that they're still making them now. It has to be a record.
Willy105 said:I never got a PS2, I was burned by the first Playstation (I own 4, because each one died), and the PS2 appeared to have the same problem. Same reason keeping me from the 360.
But problems aside, the PS2 was a brilliant product from marketing to design.
Koren said:Far from that. Famicom was produced till september 2003 (20th year). So they should produce PS2 till after 2020 to break the record.
(see e.g http://www.gamespot.com/news/6029220.html)
DidntKnowJack said:The successor to the Playstation arrived in 2000, with a lot of hype, a lot of disappointment with the launch shortages and lack of high quality games, but eventually became the juggernaut we all know today.
Melchiah said:I wouldn't call SSX Tekken Tag Tournament low quality games.
The system had so many unforgettable games, like SSX, Silent Hill 2 and 3, Shadow of Memories (a.k.a. Shadow of Destiny), Resident Evil: Code Veronica X and 4, Project Zero series, Final Fantasy X and X2 (never played XI or XII), Soul Reaver 2 and Legacy of Kain: Defiance, God of War, and many many more. Good times. *snif*
No, you're right. I loved SSX and to a lesser degree TTT. I still own them both. I was just speaking to the public's perception, right or wrong, that the first year of the PS2 was kind of dry. There were a couple games that I personally loved, but a lot of people, at least at the time, pretty much dismissed them. Or at least, didn't think they were worth plopping down 300 bucks (in the US) for a new system.Melchiah said:I wouldn't call SSX Tekken Tag Tournament low quality games.
Drkirby said:The PS2 selling badly could have something to do that I haven't seen anyplace with new units in stock since Christmas. Of the 180 Gamestops within 100 miles of me, only 18 have new ones in stock.
BC PS3 on the way? Both seem to be OOS in quite a few places.
Manmademan said:I hope that's the subsistence version. if not- back to the store with you! :lol :lol
edit:
now that that's been said, the sheer bulk of A to AAA titles on the PS2 is just staggering.
one can literally buy a game a DAY for a full year and not play everything worth playing.
I've literally become addicted to picking up $10 and under PS2 games in the last couple of weeks (they're all over) and even at those prices there are simply too many titles to choose from.
The SNES is nowhere near a competitor. the amount and quality of titles worth playing is a small fraction of what was released on PS2.
PS3 is a far more important machine (for Sony) than the PS2 ever was. Not just for gaming, but for bluray as a brand.Kintaro said:I don't see that lifecycle happening. The more I think about it, the more I believe Sony would love to forget that the PS3 ever happened if the PS4 brings them back to the top. The system will forever be a black eye on the company despite the great games on it. It will always be seen as a failure.
Majine said:PS3 is a far more important machine than the PS2 ever was. Not just for gaming, but for bluray as a brand.
Sony will force the PS3 into a success by keeping it on the market for as long as possible. It's too expensive to just forget and move on.