Why you continue to change the argument? It's just that your real point? Prove ps5 is bad designed? Looking at the series X I think Sony has been smarter to choose such way and the market seem give them the reason. The ML capabilities on Series X are a waste of tech but this is just my opinion.
What upscaler could handle ps5 with such tech? FSR4? It take 11mss on Series X gpu theorically.
Doesn't means an hardware like Series X, for example, could run it at acceptable mss costs in the gpu. Just sayin. On console even AF filter still has absurd costs compared the pc.
This thread aged like milk
You people continue to use something very hypothetical as it is very easy. Ah if MS ah if sony. Almost surely MS abandoned it because was a waste of time.
So many engineers all wasted in this forum.
Doesn't already some developer debunked it saying something like the FSR4 could take 14mss to the series X gpu or similar? That's the only concrete argument I found time ago about it to the base console.
That's true for most compute workloads - the point isn't 'how many OPs/frame' - it's how fast the workload competes.
A hacked Linux PS5 with drivers from god knows what runs XeSS (and the Int8 path of all things) and apparently gets playable results.
Doesn't RDNA2 on pc has also the famous infinite cache not available on consoles?
A hacked Linux PS5 with drivers from god knows what runs XeSS (and the Int8 path of all things) and apparently gets playable results.
Unfortunately DF decided not to actually measure its performance - tech channels eh
And still we are in the hypothetical field. Too much convintion too many variables.
chipsandcheese.com
This doesn't change my doubts.You can read up on Chips and Cheese, for the details on these GPUs. He does microbenching on all of these things.
Read up on RDNA2 and RDNA3 to learn how the caches work on these GPUs.
Chips and Cheese | Substack
The Devil is in the Details! Deep dives into computer hardware and software and the wider industry... Click to read Chips and Cheese, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
Listen take a bunch of lecture on the net not make you an expert of such stuff. So doesn't act like you are. I'm not exactly the only one who doubts about FSR4 feasible on console. Just sayin.
Not for those who already own one! Early adopters finally win one!!
The experts talk about the pc benchmarks. The only opinions I read concretely about the argument on the net not seem converge universally to the conclusion that FSR4 is easily "affordable" for something like the Series X console. PC equivalent asides.
They were sending out teams to optimise other people's games/demos. You would think if they could get universal performance/IQ boosts across games they would take the opportunity. No?
Difference between what??
It did. And Cerny is the pimp daddy.So did PS5 Pro finally became a Pro?
Not a Linux thing.
It's an HLSL shader. You can compile it down to whatever you want, it's not an issue of emulation, or the OS.
Did anyone test perf on that?
Thats why ps6 isn't coming out anytime soon. PS5 Pro leading for years to come.
Not really. Still a completely useless upgrade for its price.This thread aged like milk
2028 seems the only worst delay possible for the ps6 and still seems hazardous for sony
Because...? The difference in the IQ is enormous. Also raytracing is a way easier to push on ps5 pro. Useless is surely an overdramatic expression to use.
In a couple of titles. In most - you'd be hard pressed to see it from a typical viewing distance.
And this is resulting in what exactly? How many games "push RT on Pro" in a way which is visually transformative in comparison to the base unit?
Its high price scales with the price of the base console which also got higher and I imagine most people upgrading are trading their old one so they're not paying in full. Calling it "useless" when the difference in many games is night and day is pure ragebait.
Right....
How many? Are there even ten such games?
2 titles, really?
