Avutta1978 said:don't rememebr poiltwings allowing you to drop bombs
Well at the end of the SNES Pilotwings you controlled a helicopter gunship ...
Avutta1978 said:don't rememebr poiltwings allowing you to drop bombs
No resistance is true, but as far as movement it sounded like something you'd hold with both hands. Otherwise there'd be no need to have it sideways to begin with.Krowley said:edit// twisting for a steering wheel sucks because you can turn your wrist much more easily in one direction than the other
GameCube had a few. As long as the genre is popular, I imagine some publisher will want to cater to the audience.Avutta1978 said:the first person adeventure and racing game they will get, but unless someone is willing and crazy enought o bring a GTA clone to REV, it aint' happening.
Other than allowing for four simultaneous players, how would that be better?Stopsign said:Am I the only one who thinks that the Revmotes attach on Nunchuck thing could be like a second controller. So when you are duel-wielding some guns that the Nunchuck could be the left gun, and the regular controller could be the right. The screen would move with the either controller, depending on your preference. I think that would be the best move Nintendo could make. This would be a better solution than using two Revmotes.
Why would it be any less "gimmicky" (good lord what an overused and meaningless word this has become, by the way) than children's games on current systems? I don't understand what your beef is. It's going to have sections with different gameplay, and the developers want to make the controller tie into those different types. That sounds like a fine idea for me, if I was a kid that would be totally awesome (it actually still sounds kind of appealing to be honest). Still, the game's quality is not going to be determined by things like that, it's going to be determined by the quality of the game. I have no idea if past SpongeBob games from THQ are any good, but I assume they haven't been; if that is indeed, the case, I think it's a far more relevant predictor of this game's quality.Krowley said:i personaly don't like the sound of thegame.... this is the type of gimmicky and uncreative software that many naysayers where predicting. Thank god there is red steel to ballance it out..... I'm sure there will be plenty of cool rev games revealed at E3, but thespongebobgame sounds like ass.spongebob
edit// twisting for a steering wheel sucks because you can turn your wrist much more easily in one direction than the other, also there is no resistance. The flight stick thing sucks because of the lack of resistance.. The only thing that sounds sort of cool is bashing things with the controller, and that is pretty usless IMO.
also, i decided to put spoiler tags in too, so i would fit in :lol
underfooter said:I bet T.T. is going to get in a lot of trouble about this. He is probably breaking some sort of singed agreement, there is no good reason why he sloppily reveals it and no other online source has.
Lets keep this thread up, and hopefully a dev will see it and he will get busted.
I hate that fucker.
Chris Remo said:Why would it be any less "gimmicky" (good lord what an overused and meaningless word this has become, by the way) than children's games on current systems? I don't understand what your beef is. It's going to have sections with different gameplay, and the developers want to make the controller tie into those different types. That sounds like a fine idea for me, if I was a kid that would be totally awesome (it actually still sounds kind of appealing to be honest). Still, the game's quality is not going to be determined by things like that, it's going to be determined by the quality of the game. I have no idea if past SpongeBob games from THQ are any good, but I assume they haven't been; if that is indeed, the case, I think it's a far more relevant predictor of this game's quality.
I believe it was part of a NoE presentation at a German trade show.TheWolf said:it's real. part of a NoE event.
Yes, I agree with this bit. I wasn't indicating that kids' games should be a pushover, but that these days I don't expect them to be anything but. Hell, the games I played as a kid were generally harder than the ones I play now, when I go back and try them I'm surprised I had the patience at that age. In terms of the physical actions, I was thinking in terms of very young kids--kids have real physical toys that largely consist of "hit something and it makes a sound" or something like that, so I figured this might be analogous to that. That said, I could be drastically undershooting Spongebob's age demographic. I have never seen the show and I don't have the slightest clue what age group(s) it targets.Krowley said:My expierience growing up with the nes, and before that, Arcade games and atari ports of arcade games (which usually provided a tough challenge) makes it hard for me to appreciate the modern apporach to family friendly, easy, instant gratification "kids" games. When i was a kid, the games weren't like that, and i have a hard time imagining that i would have liked that kind of stuff (although i may have if it had been available)
I still think you're jumping to way too many conclusions about how these different control methods will be implemented and what you'll be doing not just in terms of control but in terms of gameplay. I mean I'll agree with you that in the case of this particular game I highly doubt the designers will be doing it in a particularly imaginative way, but I don't think that's inherent to the general actions Tallarico described.Anyway, I don't mean to rag on this game. I'm not the target audience for it and i despise these kinds of games so much that i can't even be objective about it.. i'll be honest and say that it's very unlikley that THQ would ever do what i would require in order to enjoy a spongebob game and normaly i wouldn't even bother to comment on one... the only reason i felt compelled to do so is because we know so little about the revolution and i was disapointed to see that these kinds of games were still going to be pretty crap even with the revmote. I was hoping there might at least be some residual "fun factor" on a hand eye coordination level, but these mini games don't sound all that cool to me.
civilstrife said:Anyone know if this is real and where it was shown? Not all that interesting, but just curious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkTAVJWUAHk&search=nintendo
I was intrigued by Miyamoto's use of the words 'applications' and 'each type of family member'. This started me thinking about what kind of games would appeal to these people.Miyamoto: In the case of Revolution, there is going to be a lot of software that are so-called 'sequels' to the existing type of games, however what is going to be the most attractive point about Revolution is the other applications. These kind of applications are going to make Revolution something really important for any ordinary household; more specifically catering for each type of family member in the house.
Rocked said:You can tell they had trouble thinking of what to say for the GameCube. :lol "We expanded the definition of gameplay"
ziran said:I was intrigued by Miyamoto's use of the words 'applications' and 'each type of family member'. This started me thinking about what kind of games would appeal to these people.
VIVA LA REVOLUTION
ANDY McNAMARA
EDITOR-IN-CHEF
First off, I cant say how proud I am to present this issue to you all. Getting an opportunity to show the first Revolution game to the world is quite an honor. Nintendo normally saves these types of unveillings for its giant, worldwide press conferences, so I wanted to at least pass along my joy and excitement over the opportunity to bring you Ubisofts newest game, Red Steel.
But there are more important thing happening here than just a huge cover story. I think this shows that Nintendo is serious about this console generation. So much so that its changing the way it deals not only with us, but with its third parties as well. And this change is for the better.
I will admit, when Nintendo first showed the Revolution controller last year, I laughed out loud at the absurdity of the whole thing. I mean, come on. A tiny remote is a revolution? But Im not too proud to eat my own words. Nintendo is on to something here. And if it can garner third-party support and truly change way games are played, this Revolution will do more than make Nintendo a lot more money for it to store in its vaults. It could change the very way all games are played now and forever.
A bold statement to be sure, but after spending some time with the Revolution and Katana, I can see how this thing could not only work, but blow-up and change the entire face of the video games industry.
I think everyone knows of the mindshare and power that PlayStation holds over the market and the industry, and that may not change with this next-generation of game machines. I know most people believed Sonys biggest challenger would be Microsoft, myself inculded, but I think there might be more to Nintendo than meets the eye.
Nintendo has gone from a dark horse to a serious competitor in my mind, and I cant wait to see how the rest of the world reacts to the Revolution.
Because like any revolution, it can either upend society as we know it, or be squashed under the power of the ruling class.
Enjoy the issue.
Cheers
Andy
Roders5 said:Sorry to bump this but there seems to be nowhere else to put Rev stuff.
Hell I aint no girl but mines feel pretty wet anywayDoc Holliday said:I were a girl my panties would be soaked.
Doc Holliday said:I were a girl my panties would be soaked.
Roders5 said:Sorry to bump this but there seems to be nowhere else to put Rev stuff.
Roders5 said:This is off topic but I can't stop laughing at this video someone else posted today so I'm going to share it again.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CRzNkb2x8aE&search=consolevania
VIVA LA REVOLUTION
ANDY McNAMARA
EDITOR-IN-CHEF
First off, I cant say how proud I am to present this issue to you all. Getting an opportunity to show the first Revolution game to the world is quite an honor. Nintendo normally saves these types of unveillings for its giant, worldwide press conferences, so I wanted to at least pass along my joy and excitement over the opportunity to bring you Ubisofts newest game, Red Steel.
But there are more important thing happening here than just a huge cover story. I think this shows that Nintendo is serious about this console generation. So much so that its changing the way it deals not only with us, but with its third parties as well. And this change is for the better.
I will admit, when Nintendo first showed the Revolution controller last year, I laughed out loud at the absurdity of the whole thing. I mean, come on. A tiny remote is a revolution? But Im not too proud to eat my own words. Nintendo is on to something here. And if it can garner third-party support and truly change way games are played, this Revolution will do more than make Nintendo a lot more money for it to store in its vaults. It could change the very way all games are played now and forever.
A bold statement to be sure, but after spending some time with the Revolution and Katana, I can see how this thing could not only work, but blow-up and change the entire face of the video games industry.
I think everyone knows of the mindshare and power that PlayStation holds over the market and the industry, and that may not change with this next-generation of game machines. I know most people believed Sonys biggest challenger would be Microsoft, myself inculded, but I think there might be more to Nintendo than meets the eye.
Nintendo has gone from a dark horse to a serious competitor in my mind, and I cant wait to see how the rest of the world reacts to the Revolution.
Because like any revolution, it can either upend society as we know it, or be squashed under the power of the ruling class.
Enjoy the issue.
Cheers
Andy
Roders5 said:This is off topic but I can't stop laughing at this video someone else posted today so I'm going to share it again.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CRzNkb2x8aE&search=consolevania
Father_Brain said:FYI, ToastyFrog says Nintendo has a DS-focused (possibly DS-only) media event tonight. If it isn't NDA'd to hell, I'm guessing that it'll be primarily about New Super Mario Bros. and Brain Training, and that game announcements will wait until E3. Still, it could be interesting.
Father_Brain said:FYI, ToastyFrog says Nintendo has a DS-focused (possibly DS-only) media event tonight. If it isn't NDA'd to hell, I'm guessing that it'll be primarily about New Super Mario Bros. and Brain Training, and that game announcements will wait until E3. Still, it could be interesting.
cool.Father_Brain said:FYI, ToastyFrog says Nintendo has a DS-focused (possibly DS-only) media event tonight. If it isn't NDA'd to hell, I'm guessing that it'll be primarily about New Super Mario Bros. and Brain Training, and that game announcements will wait until E3. Still, it could be interesting.
Hmm... I had forgotten about that. Sounds quite possible, actually.Zerodoppler said:Cool. Wasn't Nintendo Power supposed to hit subscribers tomorrow with the "biggest scoop of the year so far", aka new Castlevania game? Hopefully we'll get some footage of that.
Roders5 said:This is off topic but I can't stop laughing at this video someone else posted today so I'm going to share it again.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CRzNkb2x8aE&search=consolevania
Snow said:I believe it was part of a NoE presentation at a German trade show.
Roders5 said:This is off topic but I can't stop laughing at this video someone else posted today so I'm going to share it again.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CRzNkb2x8aE&search=consolevania
-If we can send the right message to the customer then we will see people start to understand Nintendo.
For example, when it comes to Revolution we dont call it a next-generation console. We call it a new-generation console. we want each household to have a Revolution console connected to their TV. If someone comes into your house and there isnt a Revolution sitting comfortably next to the TV, we want them to argue, and say: Oh! Why dont you have a Revolution? Thats what we want to create. We want a brand new relationship between people and their TVs through the Revolution. And when we achieve that then people will understand what Nintendo is now and what it always has been
Magazine scan - Edge
SantaCruZer said:miyamoto making some bold statements about Revolution in newest
I would laugh my ass off if it's 45 minutes of someone demonstrating Brain Training on stage. :lolOblivion said:That DS news tonight if it happens, better fucking be about NSBM and the next Castlevania.
Miyamoto said:We call it a new-generation console. we want each household to have a Revolution console connected to their TV.
Zerodoppler said:Holograms debunked once and for all!
Roders5 said:Sorry to bump this but there seems to be nowhere else to put Rev stuff.
SantaCruZer said:I dont think anyone expected that![]()