Tellaerin said:
I was referring to your preconceptions. You seem to have arrived at the conclusion that the PSP is destined to be a failure ahead of the actual US launch, and are seizing upon any shred of anecdotal evidence you can find to support your theories. I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to regard an article in the New York Times as holding more weight than the messageboard opinions of recently-minted GAF member 'gamergirly'.
Part 1 to read
Part 2 to read
700,000 units out of 1 million isnt what I'd call a failure. If you would read what I've been posting all along is that PSP isnt going to bomb, but sales are definitely going slower than what many have expected. So go read for a while.....
As I said before, it doesn't much matter to me whether you're a fangirl with a deep-seated belief in the invulnerability of Nintendo, or just someone who's convinced of the rightness of her opinion above all else. (If the idea that I may have mistaken you for a Nintendo fangirl offends you, I apologize. Unfortunately, it's been my experience that the more militant Nintendo fans here tend to be the ones most likely to grossly distort facts or engage in selective hearing when it comes to the object of their affections.) Either way, you seem to be willing to ignore the entire 'supply and demand' issue because it doesn't support what you want to believe, and that strikes me as willful ignorance on your part.
We can also say that it doesnt much matter to ME what your opinion of me is. I dont care what you call me. I never made any claims that DS was the ultimate handheld out of both, even tho it's the handheld I'm leaning towards right now in terms of future lineups. I just offered my opinion that you have overreacted to, evidenced by your name calling and branding me of a Nintendo fan.
It's funny how you are first to put "brands" on any poster all there that isnt in love with PSP, yet think you're not a anti-Nintendo fan. I guess all of us PS2 owners who dont want a PSP right now fall into that category by your logic. There's a reason why I havent bought EITHER PSP or DS, neither offer enough for me to fork over my cash for now. My recent postings have been on PSP bc that's what so many of the threads here are about.
Also, keep in mind, that the spotlight is on PSP sales since it's the system releasing right now, not DS. That was just as much "equal" discussion on that system when it was launched in December and Janurary as PSP now. Just a current theme right now in the gaming world. It'll shift again.
As for your experience,
those type of fans come in all shapes and forms and for ALL different names of companies.
Then Sony may well be guilty of creating an artificial shortage to boost demand for the Japanese PSP at launch as well. That renders nothing I've said about the US PSP and DS launches 'moot' or 'unnecessary'. You're entitled to believe what you like, certainly--apparently I'm a bit more jaded when it comes to the actions of large corporations than you are. I can understand if you don't like what I said, or if you disagree with me on that point, but in the context of the current discussion, bringing it up was hardly unnecessary.
The economics of why PSP is selling at its current rate can be debated many times over. In fact, it's already been numerous times here at GAF. I offered MY opinion of it, not what youd call a standardized opinion for EACH and EVERY platform. Just specifically the PSP which is what this thread has been about. The view changes instantly when you're talking about IPOD sales or GC sales or PS2 sales or OVERALL supply & demand.
As for this:
-jinx- said:
To be blunt, you -- and many others -- are guilty of taking a statement at face value, and it makes you look increasingly dumb the more times you repeat it.
That's the only part of your statement that is accurately reflected. But it's old news, I already admit that I was caught up in the hype for the system and expected it to sell out on Day 1. In any case, that doesnt change the fact that it's Day 4 and sell rates havent changed. Regardless, my 700,000 prediction hasnt been changed one bit. It's my view of how accurate the sales will be. And it's only a prediction, not a drilled into stone summation.
Just because Sony SAID "we expect to sell a million units in a couple of days" doesn't mean that they EXPECTED to sell a million units in a couple of days. As a company, you make those statements to create a product image in the minds of the consumers -- "this thing is HOT, it's going to be RARE, and if I don't buy it right now, I could miss out" -- to help stimulate sales.
The series of media articles about the PSP trumpeting it as a hit are also designed to cultivate this image, and I expect it will pay dividends. I find it extremely hard to believe that Sony would ACTUALLY discuss the details of their business plan in the press -- their actual projections and break-even criteria are closely guarded secrets, I'm sure.
DUH. It's PR hype, just like the artificial hype that Xbox PR created after the release of Halo 2 when it became clear that PS2 had the real momentum. Or the one over Gamecube 2 years ago when sales died down after Janurary 04.
However, what you dont seem to address here is that WHEN a company says that, they're held responsible for what they said. Anyone CAN say that so and so product didnt sell out and blah blah blah IF IN FACT that's what the company who released the PR reports or news announcements HAS said. They're held on record for their statements, not the gamers who repeat them. So, if things dont go the way they said, they can freely and publicly be critized about it. No company is oblivious or shielded from that.
Oh, and by the way, this kind of approach is Marketing and Sales 101 in plenty of other areas, not just videogames. Since you're probably 13 or 14, you haven't bought a car, but when you do, you'll hear the salespeople say the exact same thing to you when you wander onto the car lot and say you're "just looking around." They will try to tell you that your model of choice -- even the exact car -- is "very hot right now" and it's been "tough to keep them in stock." Mysteriously, "someone was just looking at that very car this morning" and "said they'd be back later." The goal is to convert interest into a sales, preferably based on impulse since the more you think about ANY purchase, the more hesitant you get.
Since you automatically categorized a person into a stereotype, I'd say you're 23 or 25 with the mind and maturity of a 13 or 14 year old. If that isnt accurate, I sure dont give a damn, you act like a 13 or 14 year old teenager and you will be viewed by me with the same level they're expected to have at that age. The comment sure wasnt needed, but then neither was mine. Your explanation of Marketing and Sales 101 is mute, a product can be marketed and "targeted" against a certain type of consumer as much as the company wants, but the end result in profit and image is what matters. Which is some of an explanation of what has happened to Gamecube.
I do have to add one more thing to the whole supply-and-demand topic, since I really think you DON'T understand how it works, no matter what you claim. Bitching about the price is a red herring. It has been shown throughout history that you can command a premium price for an item if you have a premium brand, and that is EXACTLY how Sony is trying to be perceived. The iPod is STILL far more expensive than the PSP, and Apple is selling a metric fuckload of them. Why? Because iPods are seen to be "worth it" by consumers. When you can change the terms of the debate from "X is so much more than Y, which does more or less the same thing" to "buying X is worth it because it's so much better than Y," then you have largely beaten the price game.
I dont need to "bitch" about anything. The price hurdle is evidence of a contributing factor as to why the system hasnt sold out. As for the price game that you say can be so easily beaten, then you live in a fantasy world where everyone buys HDTVs over the standard TVs and Ipods over a $25 portable cd player. Of course these products can market to a certain "audience" and sell to them, but the price will ALWAYS be a factor to the average consumer. It's one of the strongest factors into American economics.
Finally, you can save your accusations that I'm a "Sony fanboy." I have a very clear bias, and it's against people who don't think before they start running their mouth. But I will say this -- reading through a lot of threads on the Gaming Forum these days, it's usually a good bet that the truly stupid posts come from people with Nintendo-themed avatars or usernames. But, you know, that's anedoctal evidence, and I'm sure it doesn't MEAN anything, right?
I never gave one unlike the one you decisively decided to brand upon me. That indicates respect and maturity instead of fanboyish and biasm. There's really no need to reply to the rest of your "jabbering" either. It's more of the same thing. With that I will end my reply....