EmCeeGramr
Member
I was going to say that this was like the third junior from the newest batch fellating MS's services strategy and insulting everyone who didn't agree, then I looked it up and it's the same guy.
FFXI was my reason. If only I could use macros with it...
again with the lack of reading comprehension. 360 is outselling the competition in the only market that really matters, the US. EU will follow next gen.
Only because they're already paying for Live to play online.
Very few people pay XBL fee just to watch video content.
Am I missing something? You have to pay for that content on top of the fee, so its not possible for it to be cheaper than... well, anything.Prove it. People are using Live to watch video content, more than they use it to play games. 5 dollars a month is peanuts when you are watching 80 hours worth of content. That's cheaper than Netflix and the average Netflix user is only watching 33 hours of content a month.
Prove it. People are using Live to watch video content, more than they use it to play games. 5 dollars a month is peanuts when you are watching 80 hours worth of content. That's cheaper than Netflix and the average Netflix user is only watching 33 hours of content a month.
Yusuf Mehdi, who heads up marketing and strategy for Microsoft's Xbox business, said households now spend an average of 84 hours a month on the Xbox Live online service playing games, watching videos and listening to music. That's up 30% from a year ago. Just over half that time is spent on videos and music.
By comparison, the average household spend about 150 hours a month watching television.
"What we're seeing is that people are turning on the Xbox to play games and then keeping it on afterwards to get other types of entertainment," Mehdi said.
WHY?
Seriously the best set-up in the world is what I have now. iPad in lap to look up things while playing my game. (substitute any other tablet and/or mobile phone as needed)
See bolded. Games first, video second. They are not buying XBL subs to just watch video when a $59 Roku/their Smart TV will do the same without a sub.
Sigh, It seems like once again folks don't get it. For clarity's sake, a fully KINECT enabled (primarily voice) IE announcement would be sufficient in and of itself for MS to completely dominate Sony and Nintendo at E3.
And I think this has worked Stateside/in the UK, but I firmly believe Gold is holding them back from being successful in mainland Europe.it's a tremendous achievement, one that shouldn't be overlooked or played down. MS have basically monetized video and music like Last FM and YT through their service. It's incredible.
And I think this has worked Stateside/in the UK, but I firmly believe Gold is holding them back from being successful in mainland Europe.
Watching PAL threads every week, they're being pretty soundly beaten by PS3 on the continent.
I wouldn't say soundly beaten, but they aren't doing as well. You do have to remember that this is only their second gen to Sony's third, it's not all that surprising they haven't made that many inroads into Europe.
next gen will be interesting, I think we'll start more of a shift towards the nextbox for a number of reasons, the main one being their online service. Provided Europe doesn't implode from the current crisis.
Spec on my part, MS have been making inroads into Europe, if they can deliver a powerful but cheap console, they'll have it wrapped up. Their sub idea is actually ingenious in this regard, but I can't see them rolling it out at the start of the gen, but if they do...man, Sony and to a lesser extent, Ninty, don't stand a chance.
The price of gold and added value will be of a big significance, if they can add further value through PS+ style sales or by doing more deals whereby you get a 2 year sub for 80 - 90 bucks, they'll have a better chance of attracting more users.
Only if we actually get added value with Gold next time. In Europe it's just online play and week earlier demos now. The video rental services are crap, there is no Netflix (I think only in the UK?).The price of gold and added value will be of a big significance, if they can add further value through PS+ style sales or by doing more deals whereby you get a 2 year sub for 80 - 90 bucks, they'll have a better chance of attracting more users.
You do know that in many countries in eu gold is a pos right?. You really cant call anything next gen, who wouldve thought this gen would have panned out as it did at the start.
Only if we actually get added value with Gold next time. In Europe it's just online play and week earlier demos now. The video rental services are crap, there is no Netflix (I think only in the UK?).
again with the lack of reading comprehension. 360 is outselling the competition in the only market that really matters, the US. EU will follow next gen.
Good. Still hilarious how the most "online" console is still the only one without a browser.
Tell me how the video services on Apple TV or Roku aren't as well integrated compared to Xbox? And what does that even mean? You launch an app and watch the video.You're missing the point, people are getting more use out of their gold subs by keeping their 360 on to use the various video/music apps. It's less about what they use the console for first, but what other uses they get out of it and MS have grown their MS significantly through various apps, that are available on other platforms, but aren't as well integrated.
I like mine better. It's called the PC.
Actually I speculated that the Xbox would get a browser. Multiple points supported this:I laughed. Ahem.. Wow, MS really pulled the wool over jeff_rigby's eyes. He had no idea. There wasn't one incredibly 8 month thread or anything.
Well if they put it on the 360, they can claim 50/60 million more IE users, so they are closer to catching up to the competition.
Could be the whole reason for this move.