DieAntwoord
Banned
since it wasn't answered in the official thread. Haven't started just yet despite having it since launch. I've only seen Zoltan in a single screenshot. Is he involved in this story at all? Or just a side character?
since it wasn't answered in the official thread. Haven't started just yet despite having it since launch. I've only seen Zoltan in a single screenshot. Is he involved in this story at all? Or just a side character?
Haven't seen anything about Iorveth or Saskia. Are they just not in the game at all?
Beginning mentioned Aedirn had fallen to one of the warring sides but other then that nothing.
Seems odd the choices made in Witcher 2 at least for me are insignificant regarding these 2.
Haven't seen anything about Iorveth or Saskia. Are they just not in the game at all?
Beginning mentioned Aedirn had fallen to one of the warring sides but other then that nothing.
Seems odd the choices made in Witcher 2 at least for me are insignificant regarding these 2.
Hmmmm weird. I'll have to check the guide because even the wiki says that his survival depended on her being there.
Yep. I too had had a 'disagreement' with Kiera and she wasn't able to attend the battle. Lambert made it through mine too.
At 1 point in the battle when Vesemir is getting everyone to pull back, Lambert stays on the front line and you have to go give him help. A health bar pops up on the screen and you have to, I gather, make the save before it expires or he dies. I got to him ezy, and Letho was still fighting with him at that, though no concern was shown for him obviously
I am a bit confused...I got the Empress Ciri ending, and in it, there is a blizzard occurring in White Orchard. Does this mean that Ciri did not actually defeat the white frost? Is this tied to a specific choice I made?
I'm a bit torn on whether Empress Ciri is a 'good ending' or not. While its good if she ends up doing something that makes her happy (as a witcher), in this empress ending, she does seem to actually believe that this is something she will be good at and has the skills for. Will it make her happy? I mean it seems like what actually makes her happy is just being around Geralt, so I was more angry that Geralt didn't go with her to Nilfgard.
I wonder if there is any youtuber that has made and uploaded all the ending bits.
Haven't seen anything about Iorveth or Saskia. Are they just not in the game at all?
.
Also I lol at those guys who killed Letho in Witcher 2. The guy ended up being such an amazing bro. He's even the only one who decides to stay back in Kaer Morhen and thanks you for the invitation.
The variations or just the Ciri parts?
you aren't the only one it's a fairly agreed nod to their next game.So am I the only one thinking that Ciri went to the world that 2077 is set in? She talks about going to a world where people use technology to communicate and have metal in their heads which is obviously referring to androids like in the 2077 trailer.
Could she have a cameo in the game? It would be weird but fascinating as well
So am I the only one thinking that Ciri went to the world that 2077 is set in? She talks about going to a world where people use technology to communicate and have metal in their heads which is obviously referring to androids like in the 2077 trailer.
Could she have a cameo in the game? It would be weird but fascinating as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r08I_h1TBEI wonder if there is any youtuber that has made and uploaded all the ending bits.
What happens if you give Yen that crystal crow's skull?
What happens if you give Yen that crystal crow's skull?
That must be the deal then. It might be that there isn't a retry if the health bar goes down. This is probably the scene where Keira automatically saves him instead of having you go down there.
Also I lol at those guys who killed Letho in Witcher 2. The guy ended up being such an amazing bro. He's even the only one who decides to stay back in Kaer Morhen and thanks you for the invitation.
Hmm not exactly everything.
I was looking forward to the Triss and Yennefer ending variations. Also, seems like the endings there only had one variation for the Skellige throne choice.
Yeah, when I saw his health bar pop up and Ves constantly yelling at him to get back, I kinda figured it was a one shot kinda deal. Thing is, it was really easy to save him. He barely even took a hit by the time I got there. You can pretty much drop straight into the courtyard where hes fighting, making sure to roll on landing to negate what would otherwise take a massive chunk of health and you're basically there.
The minmap thing wanted me to run all the way around and down some stairs. If you follow that then maybe I could see it being an issue. Not sure what was up with the people who wrote that guide letting him die. Maybe they didn't like him which is sort of understandable
Agreed on Letho. Rolling with him in the early missions was just so fucking cool. Felt bad stuffing up faking his death. I kept his warning in mind through the whole thing, but dammit how could you not do something at the end.
Curious now on what happens if you do nothing? Does he still end up at Kaer Morhen? You wouldn't have the opportunity at that point to invite him. As far as you're concerned he's dead.
Also, crap! You're saying if you ask him to stay at Vesemirs funeral, he actually does? After chatting to Eskell and him wanting to bail, I didn't think I'd trouble Letho by asking him. It seemed like the place was falling apart and with Vesemir dead there was no real reason to stay. Letho had well and truly fulfilled all bro duties by that point and if anything I felt I owed him. So I just asked him what he was going to do and he basically said take off over some mountains into another land or some shit. Gave him an imaginary virtual fist bump and that was that...
Yeah, it did come out of nowhere. I thought Avallac'h was opening the flood gates to another world effectively doing what Eredin wanted but having Geralt eliminate him. It makes more sense then that way. Why would Eredin care if Ciri stopped the white frost? Isn't that why they ride from world to world?
I didn't tell any of the other witchers to stay. One was going on a mission with his waifu, and the other after the shit we'd been through deserved to go clear his mind far away.
Just on that something a little odd I noticed. Eskell basically says afterwards, that hes out and that there's no point in staying. However if you read his bio in the Glossary it says that after Vesemirs death he went on to be the main caretaker at Kaer Morhen. Seemed to contradict the conversation with him afterwards a bit.
Maybe he changed his mind after a while. I gather the written bios and quest summaries are penned from an old Dandelion years from when they happened, so there's a good chunk of time for him to clear his head on the road and go back I suppose
Didn't see this question answered yet...
How I understand it is that the white frost is this thing (and what it is is completely vague...no clue on that) that threatens all worlds, including the worlds of Geralt and the Aen Elle elves, two of whom are Avellac'h and Eredin. The Aen Elle elves's world is under extreme threat from this white frost right now, so both Avellac'h and Eredin likely believe it dire to attempt to save their home world from the threat. Eredin via the Wild Hunt raids other worlds in the hopes of finding a suitable one to colonize, which requires overcoming that world militarily, and thus he requires some sort of method for large scale teleportation between worlds. Avellac'h is not as ruthless as Eredin, but still desires his world to be saved very greatly. He desires to use Ciri to accomplish that purpose. Therefore, both Eredin and Avellac'h's ultimate goals are the same (saving their world from the frost), but they use different means to get there. One thing that is never properly explained is why precisely ciri must travel to fight the white frost right while you are in battle with Eredin. I mean, why would she and Avellac'h not wait till after the battle is over?
The cut from Ciri potentially sacrificing herself to save the world to her just being back with no explanation is almost definitely a holdover from the Witcher ending, where they lead you to believe that Ciri actually died until its revealed she's alive when Geralt meets her at the tavern in White Orchard. They must've just been pressed for time and couldn't add in more to the Empress ending, because in that particular ending it really doesn't make any sense not to give more explanation to what happened.Finished, adored the ending even as it was unexpected (Ciri Empress). Loved how they handled more or less everything. Playable epilogue was perfect.
The main quest as a whole isn't without some faults but the some total of parts elevate it. The only really glaring blemish I see is Ciri fucking off to the white frost then returning with zero exposition of what the fuck happened. Avallach's betrayal was hinted at already and the prophecy has been a theme throughout the series, so even though it was kinda sped up towards the end and could have done with a bit more development I didn't mind. But yeah, the Ciri stuff was just a whole bunch of what. The sequence implies she's going to her death, but then she doesn't die and you never see why, or what she did, or what happened, or anything. Unless I missed something it's basically a massive development left (intentionally?) vague and unexplained.
Otherwise yeah, adored the ending.
I feel like the only person who enjoyed the bad ending. It felt like a realistic and natural conclusion to Geralt's story. Having a happily ever after ending just doesn't suit the series imo. Ciri could also still be alive in the bad ending.
edit: Eatchildren's post above is another reason why bad ending is superior. Having ciri nip off to beat the white frost and come back like nothings happened is just stupid.
The cut from Ciri potentially sacrificing herself to save the world to her just being back with no explanation is almost definitely a holdover from the Witcher ending, where they lead you to believe that Ciri actually died until its revealed she's alive when Geralt meets her at the tavern in White Orchard. They must've just been pressed for time and couldn't add in more to the Empress ending, because in that particular ending it really doesn't make any sense not to give more explanation to what happened.
To be fair I only refer to it as the bad ending because thats what everyone calls it. I don't really consider it to be bad.Oh the bad end is fine, the only problem is that it is the bad ending.
Suicidal depressing ending doesn't fit the world just because it's a dark fantasy. This isn't a Stephen king book.To be fair I only refer to it as the bad ending because thats what everyone calls it. I don't really consider it to be bad.
Really? Maybe they decided that they wanted to have 3 endings, but not specifically what those endings are? Because they all seem rushed. The game takes its time, pacing out story excellently the entire game, including the sidequests, only for the final chapter to be 5 minutes long for the Witcher ending, 10 for the Crone ending, and 15 for the Empress ending, taking very little time to breathe or resolve things.It strikes me as somewhat curious, given that they had defined the 3 main endings +variants very early in development. They certainly could have squared off the white frost stuff a bit better to fit all 3 endings.
The lack of explanation in the Witcher ending is entirely to trick the player into thinking that Ciri is dead.EDIT: I think the lack of explanation in both the witcher and empress endings exist also to drive home a "it doesn't matter" point. Time has passed, some stuff happened, but it's not important. What matters is the bond between Geralt and Ciri, and what comes after.
I don't know man, glad you enjoyed it but it would've left a very bad taste in my mouth if I had gotten that ending, after all that time and investment. After all that time and investment, to an unsatisfactory ending is unforgivable for me, but then again I come from a writing background. I would've been even more furious if I found out just what the criteria was that decided the ending.To be fair I only refer to it as the bad ending because thats what everyone calls it. I don't really consider it to be bad.
Agreed, the ending doesn't need to be dark just for the sake of being dark. That's poor writing, and it's the reason why the entire game isn't depressing. As dark and serious as some parts are, its always paced excellently between well-written humorous and light-hearted spots.Suicidal depressing ending doesn't fit the world just because it's a dark fantasy. This isn't a Stephen king book.
The lack of explanation in the Witcher ending is entirely to trick the player into thinking that Ciri is dead.
Probably 3 endings and 12 different cards?So was CDPR's claim that W3 has 36 different ending states true? Because it really doesn't seem that way.
Depends how you look at it. The Ciri plot only has the three, but take into account the minor worldstate details and it might total to something like 36. I say "minor" for those worldstate details because they seem to not really matter to me as much, but I'm wondering if that's because they were relegated to still images and not given an actual place in the ending scenes.So was CDPR's claim that W3 has 36 different ending states true? Because it really doesn't seem that way.
I mean I think the Empress ending was super rushed because of the criteria for getting that ending vs the Witcher ending, which is just go visit Emhyr, and then even though Ciri yells at him she still takes the throne. I don't see how that one action radically changes her character arc from "someone who wants to be free and not be subject to the whims of others" to "someone who is going to sacrifice her independence for the greater good." There's just nothing in that one scene that can change her like that. And even if there was, it would be an egregious fuck you to the player to have that pivotal moment offscreen, as Geralt waits outside while they talk. You're really telling me that THAT scene is the most pivotal one of her character arc? Come on. And that's the ONLY scene different leading to the Empress ending. Obviously Radovid can die in either the Witcher or Empress endings.EDIT: I actually don't feel the empress ending was rushed. Quite the opposite. As a personal journey it was as beautiful, short little cap on the story and accentuated the state of the world through the setting (like all the white orchard soldiers wielding Termerian shields, and commentary from folk on the state of the war and Novigrad). To me this is the Mass Effect vs Witcher difference: the former heavily relies on Shepard being the centrepiece for every single narrative thread no matter how ludicrous the scope, while in the latter Geralt is often a passenger to greater events that even if influenced he has no real investment in. So the playable sequence is centred on what matters most to Geralt: the personal element. Meanwhile the state of the world is appropriately narrated by old man Dandelion, who is the most likely person to be telling such stories that cover everything.
As a personal journey choosing Triss and having Yennefer totally absent and unreferenced is probably the biggest missing element.