D
Deleted member 80556
Unconfirmed Member
I think I know why some parts after the Kaer Morhen battle bother me. It's because whoever wrote the story of those quests, essentially made this mistake. Some things came out of left field, like Crach an Craite suddenly fighting Eredin, when previously he had not said he would join the fight with the Nilfgaardians to defeat the Hunt. How Eredin magically knew that Avallac'h was taking Ciri to the tower. How in two endings Ciri just returned, with no explanation of what she did to prevent the White Frost from happening (even if it was done to keep the suspense on whether or not she survived or had died) when she was with Geralt.
And well, obviously the other things like powerpoint endings (I played the previous games a long time ago, did they do the same back then?), neglecting Triss' character, and making characters like Dijkstra make a decision out of his character (as if Geralt would have really left Roche, Ves and Thaler to die there). It's a shame, it kind of sticks as a sore thumb for me, because the rest of the game is just spectacular. And it's not like they're very low lows, but in a game that keeps the bar so high throughout the entire journey, it makes me sad that they made those small mistakes right at the end.
And well, obviously the other things like powerpoint endings (I played the previous games a long time ago, did they do the same back then?), neglecting Triss' character, and making characters like Dijkstra make a decision out of his character (as if Geralt would have really left Roche, Ves and Thaler to die there). It's a shame, it kind of sticks as a sore thumb for me, because the rest of the game is just spectacular. And it's not like they're very low lows, but in a game that keeps the bar so high throughout the entire journey, it makes me sad that they made those small mistakes right at the end.