Ghost said:Are they saying there are no gays in Star Wars? Or that that sexuality isn't labelled in Star Wars therefore there's nothing to discuss?
This. Clearly.
Ghost said:Are they saying there are no gays in Star Wars? Or that that sexuality isn't labelled in Star Wars therefore there's nothing to discuss?
birdman said:...why do relationships in MMOs matter anyway? It seems that the core point is meaningless.
Speevy said:Twi'lek Male: "Mucha shaka paka, ah dah de dung dunga dunga."
Twi'lek Female: "Ooona hanna wanna wanna."
Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna wanna."
Another Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna lesbian sex?"
Twi'lek Male Observer: "Mucha shaka paka!"
:lolSpeevy said:From my point of view, the Jedi are gay.
EmCeeGramr said:Holy crap, racist much? :|
:lolSpeevy said:Twi'lek Male: "Mucha shaka paka, ah dah de dung dunga dunga."
Twi'lek Female: "Ooona hanna wanna wanna."
Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna wanna."
Another Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna lesbian sex?"
Twi'lek Male Observer: "Mucha shaka paka!"
Confidence Man said:First you let gays in Star Wars, next thing they'll want to get gay married in the game.
It's a slippery slope.
Speevy said:Twi'lek Male: "Mucha shaka paka, ah dah de dung dunga dunga."
Twi'lek Female: "Ooona hanna wanna wanna."
Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna wanna."
Another Twi'lek Female: "Oona hanna wanna lesbian sex?"
Twi'lek Male Observer: "Mucha shaka paka!"
"I'm a Tatooine moisture farmer helplessly watching the empire teach my children that gay marriage is okay."birdman said:I'm waiting for the Sith's release of their own "Gathering Storm"
Stumpokapow said:Do you seriously not understand?
If you think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and daddy", you should think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and mommy". If you think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess, you should think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess. If you think it should be okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the opposite sex, you should think it's okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the same sex.
Portraying homosexuality as necessarily pornographic and inappropriate for children while heterosexuality can be abstracted into "love", "family", "romance", or other kid-friendly terms is necessarily making homosexuality second class.
Part of the issue is heteronormativity; the idea that unlabeled people are implicitly heterosexual, and that gays are forced to out themselves. Your attitude doesn't promote tolerance, it promotes "separate but equal" inequality.
ArchangelSylph said:Honestly, this is getting rediculous!!! Next thing you know people will be getting upset over disscussions about "gays" in pokemon!
no I wasnt banned. Not that someone thinks because I went silent. It just saddened me so much, that for a time I just did not know what to say anymore.
I am grateful Bioware has opened the thread again, and allowed the words gay and lesbian now. Though I can't hide that I am quite disappointed. Bioware games had always been about complex ethical questions, about vast, diverse realities, and as such I had never expect Bioware of all companies to be so... narrow in this question. I was a Bioware fan so long... it was really a shock to see the thread closed.
battleMAUS said:do u know how stupid this sounds
EmCeeGramr said:Holy crap, racist much? :|
there's a great chappelle's show clip dealing with this, but comedy central is too lazy to have it up.Speevy said:From my point of view, the Jedi are gay.
pakkit said:It's still idiotic to lock all the threads, though.
krazen said:Considering Microsoft caught some heat for that lesbian username flack, it was a pretty horrible way to handle it.
Stumpokapow said:Do you seriously not understand?
If you think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and daddy", you should think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and mommy". If you think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess, you should think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess. If you think it should be okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the opposite sex, you should think it's okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the same sex.
Portraying homosexuality as necessarily pornographic and inappropriate for children while heterosexuality can be abstracted into "love", "family", "romance", or other kid-friendly terms is necessarily making homosexuality second class.
Part of the issue is heteronormativity; the idea that unlabeled people are implicitly heterosexual, and that gays are forced to out themselves. Your attitude doesn't promote tolerance, it promotes "separate but equal" inequality.
battleMAUS said:do u know how stupid this sounds
battleMAUS said:do u know how stupid this sounds
mikekennyb said:Why again did Steven Totillo leave MTV for Kotaku?
I wonder if I should bust out my psychology notes...nah.diunxx said:Let me guess, you are one of the "if we show the kids that homosexuality is okay then they will all become gay" people?
EmCeeGramr said:My slash fiction... ruined...
battleMAUS said:do u know how stupid this sounds
Stumpokapow said:Do you seriously not understand?
If you think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and daddy", you should think it's okay to teach a kid about "mommy and mommy". If you think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess, you should think it's okay for the prince to kiss the princess. If you think it should be okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the opposite sex, you should think it's okay for a character to have an in-game marriage/union with the same sex.
Portraying homosexuality as necessarily pornographic and inappropriate for children while heterosexuality can be abstracted into "love", "family", "romance", or other kid-friendly terms is necessarily making homosexuality second class.
Part of the issue is heteronormativity; the idea that unlabeled people are implicitly heterosexual, and that gays are forced to out themselves. Your attitude doesn't promote tolerance, it promotes "separate but equal" inequality.