roosnam1980
Gold Member
Audrey Hepburn is severely over rated imo
Fuck these modern bitches with their opinions and right to vote, it's all about the sweet sweet 17th century hotties!!!Nah i would still take de armas over audrey every day of the week, i still prefer modern over the best of the old days, but yeah maybe the facial structure of audrey is more "perfect".
I was curious to know if people in here also prefer modern beaty.
(Never been a fan of marylin myself tbh, other than a curvy body, her face never impressed me much at all)
Check out these ugly ass 14th century waifs
Fuck these modern bitches with their opinions and right to vote, it's all about the sweet sweet 17th century hotties!!!
![]()
![]()
Old time beauty.Is it controversial to say that they beauty of today beat the beauty of the past 100 to 0?
Those 2 were considered some of the hottest actress ever and if you ask me even a just-cute face of sweeney absolutely nuclearize those 2 chicks, their museum worth haircuts surely doesn't help neither.
But tbf, i have adversion for everything that is old looking, cars, bikes, women, always been a dude who like modern stuff since forever, italians loves an old 500 car or an old vespa scooter, i fucking despise both
From all the very old gals, i think my favourite was audrey hepburn, her face pass the test of time while keeping that classic classy flavour.
![]()
Do you people love more modern beauty or old times beauty?
![]()
Welp, I'm done with my contributions
Would be funny to open a contest with various picks to know what most gaf think.Old time beauty.
I think part of it, for me, is also they way they dressed back then.Would be funny to open a contest with various picks to know what most gaf think.
Lol that is a huge turn off for me, i enjoy my whore dressingI think part of it, for me, is also they way they dressed back then.
I caught some old French movie on tcm with this couple in an apartment and the woman was one of the most gorgeous beings I've ever seen. I feel no need to rank eras, women are always stunning.Is it controversial to say that they beauty of today beat the beauty of the past 100 to 0?
Those 2 were considered some of the hottest actress ever and if you ask me even a just-cute face of sweeney absolutely nuclearize those 2 chicks, their museum worth haircuts surely doesn't help neither.
But tbf, i have adversion for everything that is old looking, cars, bikes, women, always been a dude who like modern stuff since forever, italians loves an old 500 car or an old vespa scooter, i fucking despise both
From all the very old gals, i think my favourite was audrey hepburn, her face pass the test of time while keeping that classic classy flavour.
![]()
Do you people love more modern beauty or old times beauty?
I think it has a lot to do with the type of makeup, dresses and haircuts, those definitely trick the eyes into thinking that there is more difference than the real actual difference.I caught some old French movie on tcm with this couple in an apartment and the woman was one of the most gorgeous beings I've ever seen. I feel no need to rank eras, women are always stunning.
I think there is an aesthetic that helps determine what type of lady gets picked for hollywood/modelling roles over others. Obviously before the 60's it had to be natural/cosmetics, as I think plastic surgery was very much in its infancy. I'm sure there was some stuff but NOTHING like the total face sculpting they can do today. The lion faced fish lipped hags would have been almost inconceivable 50 years ago but now they are commonplace.I think it has a lot to do with the type of makeup, dresses and haircuts, those definitely trick the eyes into thinking that there is more difference than the real actual difference.
But i'm also convinced that the physiognomy of women faces\bodies changed a bit compared to the past.
can you share the name of the actress?
Nice knickers.
Once again I'll save this thread from banality
![]()
Absolutely!![]()
Would still smash.
Basically you eat shit everytime you lick a butthole, so I don't think this image would apply to any of you sick fucks.Goddamn I love this woman.
okay... possibly unpopular take, but I hate her jeans cut here, loose in a way that actually makes her ass look flat and even downplays hips. Not a style that good on women at all.
for a much hotter example of a jeans ad campaign launch, look back at Kylie announcing a new Levis cut a few years ago
![]()
![]()
Her arse doesn't look flat in the ad, plus you really post a woman who has as much plastic surgery as Madonnaokay... possibly unpopular take, but I hate her jeans cut here, loose in a way that actually makes her ass look flat and even downplays hips. Not a style that good on women at all.
for a much hotter example of a jeans ad campaign launch, look back at Kylie announcing a new Levis cut a few years ago
![]()
![]()
Barf. Don't post that plastic monstrosity in the queens thread, heathen.
I was posting about the jeans cut specifically, not that woman's face... and those jeans are vastly superior to the loose boyish fit of the Sweeney ad.Her arse doesn't look flat in the ad, plus you really post a woman who has as much plastic surgery as Madonna
Plastic surgery isn't just done to the face my manI was posting about the jeans cut specifically, not that woman's face... and those jeans are vastly superior to the loose boyish fit of the Sweeney ad.
cool info that has zero relevance; in that ad she looks just like the real women who wear that jeans cut from the ad. I've seen plenty of them in real life. It's a much better look.Plastic surgery isn't just done to the face my man
It's not a weird need to defend her, you just posted a terrible comparison with a woman with a giant fake buttcool info that has zero relevance; in that ad she looks just like the real women who wear that jeans cut from the ad. I've seen plenty of them in real life. It's a much better look.
This American Eagle style is not remotely feminine nor embracing women's curves at all, which actually kind of cuts sharply against the whole "Sweeney is great because embraces femininity" angle that makes her popular. Weird need to "defend" Sweeney.
my entire post was about the ugly jeans cut... I don't do the weird "my queen "nonsense and care zero about which woman wins or whatever, they're just products and advertising all the way downIt's not a weird need to defend her, you just posted a terrible comparison with a woman with a giant fake butt
I think the message here is that Sweeney can wear granny jeans and STILL look amazing!cool info that has zero relevance; in that ad she looks just like the real women who wear that jeans cut from the ad. I've seen plenty of them in real life. It's a much better look.
This American Eagle style is not remotely feminine nor embracing women's curves at all, which actually kind of cuts sharply against the whole "Sweeney is great because embraces femininity" angle that makes her popular. Weird need to "defend" Sweeney.
Yea, you picked a bad example because that giant fake tuchus will make any jeans look pertmy entire post was about the ugly jeans cut... I don't do the weird "my queen "nonsense and care zero about which woman wins or whatever, they're just products and advertising all the way down
Calling it now, she's gonna branch out, build brands and be a Billionaire:
today's VS is awful... back in the 80s-90s they were largely aimed at what I'd call "domestic" women, eg. something sexy to wear for your husband on special occasions; it was mature in a good way, and a bit "classy"Victoria's Secret seems to be failing because they lost their way, 'Sydneys Sweets' could fill that lacey void.