If I had known that, I would have replied and not make a thread. Never seen a thread about it here myself. But, instead of "thread whining" you're always free to just pass by it.this kind of thread pop up every fucking month here and I cringe every time.
On the flip side, I don't see how I am supposed to care about a character I've only known for 2 hours of my life.I don't doubt the quality of television these days but I want stories that don't need 45 mins an episode and 10 seasons to be told.
Television has the added benefit of being able to take it's time. And this only counts for certain genres. Mostly drama. Comedy and Action still lag behind IMO.
On the flip side, I don't see how I am supposed to care about a character I've only known for 2 hours of my life.
But do you mean all movies, or big blockbuster, Hollywood movies?Just to make a little clearer on what I meant in my OP, I'm talking about recent TV shows in the last few years and recent movies in the last few years.... Say, around 2 - 4 years. I'm not referring to the entire history of movies and television. In the past, I personally enjoyed movies more than TV.
All movies that I've seen. A lot (not all) of them are blockbusters but that's only because I like a lot of sci-fi, fantasy, horror and action although that would be most of my TV watching as well.But do you mean all movies, or big blockbuster, Hollywood movies?
I'l
http://www.gq.com/entertainment/mov...ay-the-movies-died-mark-harris?printable=trueWith that in mind, let's look ahead to what's on the menu for this year: four adaptations of comic books. One prequel to an adaptation of a comic book. One sequel to a sequel to a movie based on a toy. One sequel to a sequel to a sequel to a movie based on an amusement-park ride. One prequel to a remake. Two sequels to cartoons. One sequel to a comedy. An adaptation of a children's book. An adaptation of a Saturday-morning cartoon. One sequel with a 4 in the title. Two sequels with a 5 in the title. One sequel that, if it were inclined to use numbers, would have to have a 7 1/2 in the title...
Movies are self-contained, but they rely on the box office. I'd also offer that people are always clamoring for sequels of their favorite movies. A movie series, like say the Lethal Weapon or Die Hard franchises, are pretty much as long as half a tv season each. And Star Trek movies...
All movies that I've seen. A lot (not all) of them are blockbusters but that's only because I like a lot of sci-fi, fantasy, horror and action although that would be most of my TV watching as well.
Would you, uh, like me to bring some benzos with me to give to you when I go?Go to the Toronto film festival and say this to my face again.
I haven't given up on movies entirely but I'm sure not excited about anything. Pretty much all of the sci-fi, superhero and action flicks I've seen from 2013 ranged from mediocre to just plain awful and I've seen almost all of the movies in those genre for that year.I think you should try to broaden the horizon, before giving up on movies altogether.
Besides, i can't really think of very good Sci-fi, Fantasy or even Horror tv series.. i guess Game of Thrones is pretty good entertainment.
The only good action series i can name are Banshee and probably Strike Back (haven't seen it yet, but hear good things) and it still can't hold a candle to the best (even recent) action movies.
It seems like your tastes are more fit for movies to begin with!
I was exaggerating, but the point remains that one should know where to look for diversity in the film market.Would you, uh, like me to bring some benzos with me to give to you when I go?
The only good action series i can name are Banshee and probably Strike Back (haven't seen it yet, but hear good things) and it still can't hold a candle to the best (even recent) action movies.
I think you should try to broaden the horizon, before giving up on movies altogether.
Besides, i can't really think of very good Sci-fi, Fantasy or even Horror tv series.. i guess Game of Thrones is pretty good entertainment.
The only good action series i can name are Banshee and probably Strike Back (haven't seen it yet, but hear good things) and it still can't hold a candle to the best (even recent) action movies.
It seems like your tastes are more fit for movies to begin with!
You're overrating most action movies. Strike Back holds it's own in that category.
At the moment yeah. But then something like that double header of the raid and dredd comes along
Or the fast and furious franchise
Compared to the junk sci-fi movies I've seen from 2013? Absolutely.Fringe and Falling Skies as examples of television being better than movies? No.
Flight was atrocious, just straight-up rotting garbage. some good movies from the past couple years: Inside Llewyn Davis, Before Midnight, The Act of Killing, Spring Breakers, Her, 12 Years a Slave, Girl Walk // All Day, Certified Copy, American Scream, Oslo August 31st, The Social Network, Scott Pilgrim, Exit Through The Gift Shop, Dogtooth, The Raid, Magic Mike, The Innkeepers, Holy Motors, Shame, Beginners, Attack the Block, A Separation, Take Shelter, Tabloid, Weekend, The Tree of LifeThere were a handfull of movies I did enjoy. One recent movie that I saw that I really liked was Flight with Denzel Washington.
I'm saying that I barely see movies that I do like nowadays and by that I mean, maybe, in the last couple of years. Overall, I find myself enjoying television shows a lot more.
there's been a ton of indie sci-fi and horror and action the past couple years. I said The Raid already, there's a whole underground scene of DTV action that's acclaimed as being superior to any hwd action filmmaking led by directors like John Hyams, there's the horror movement that's being labeled "mumblegore" after the fact with directors like Adam Wingard and Ti West, there's experimental sci-fi like +1 and Upstream Color. and hell, the Fast and Furious movies are box office juggernauts and also incredible, high soap action spectacles. I highly rec looking outside of superhero movies and YA adaptations. I'd also like to hear what action movies you saw that were mediocre to plain awful, or the sci-fi that was junk, just to get a better idea of where you're coming from. For instance, if you haven't seen The Raid or Attack the Block but think action and sci-fi movies from the past couple years are garbage, then you're just not watching movies that are actually getting positive impressionsAll movies that I've seen. A lot (not all) of them are blockbusters but that's only because I like a lot of sci-fi, fantasy, horror and action although that would be most of my TV watching as well.
Agree on all this. even on the comedies part: I think TV offers more opportunity for alt comedy. Because movies used to have that in more mid-budget works, and there's really no lane for that anymore. But on TV? Birthday Boys, Comedy Bang Bang, Portlandia, Community, Parks, Broad City, Review, Party Down, Always Sunny, Louie, more more more. But yeah, that's just a current condition thing. As mediums they're simply different.Agreed. It feels like there's less than one comedy a year that I really like with movies. With TV, there's Parks and Rec, Community, Brooklyn 99, New Girl, and that's without really going into shows on hiatus or recently ended.
However, it is worth noting that Movies and TV have inherently different strengths and weaknesses, so comparisons of quality can only go so deep before you're just talking about what differentiates the mediums
.
Yeah i'll get to that, probably this week, since Banshee is done for this year!You're overrating most action movies. Strike Back holds it's own in that category.
We're talking recent TV and recent Movies.Say what?
No, my post says that I've watched mostly blockbuster films of the sci-fi, superhero, horror, etc. genre nor do I say I watch plenty of television. Actually, I don't have the capability to watch TV and usually have to use Netflix, Prime or Hulu when I can.all your post is saying is "I watch only blockbusters and mainstream films, mostly superhero and sci-fantasy works, without making any effort to find the 100 or so good movies released in a year that aren't advertised on taco bell cups and are actually critically acclaimed and recognized as remarkable. I do watch plenty of TV though".
For me it's a pacing thing, I mean I don't mind sitting through half a season in one go but watching one 3 hr movie can be exhausting. I don't like the network standard of 45 minutes though, 1 hr for a serious drama is the sweet spot for me.The money is flowing more and more towards TV, that is for sure. There are a lot of great films still, but to me TV is having a bigger impact on me these days. I think I also enjoy episodic storytelling more, most movies are just too long.
Compared to the junk sci-fi movies I've seen from 2013? Absolutely.
Compared to the junk sci-fi movies I've seen from 2013? Absolutely.
Yes, actually Gravity was the last movie I saw and I absolutely hated it. Inception was average and I did not care for District 9. The latter was made even worse because my ex-gf recently broke up with me and I lost my job and depressing movie as it was, it was the last thing I needed.But this is highly dependent on what you saw last year. Did you see Upstream Color? How about Gravity?
Also, you're taking one year. Fringe was on from 2008 to 2013. During that time, we got Moon, Inception, District 9, Attack The Block, and Looper. And that's just from a quick Google search. I really enjoyed Fringe, but I think you're making an unfair comparison.
I also feel like a lot of people remember the highlights of TV shows, but not the down time. Even I'm guilty if it, and I'm amazed how often I go back to a show and realize how much of it I've forgotten, and how I genealogy only remember the highs.
Oh, also saw you mention the Raid. I have not seen that but would like to. I have heard that Dredd is similar (story-wise) and, despite thinking it was going to be hot garbage, I actually liked Dredd. It was nothing special but compared to a lot of other action, sci-fi, etc. I've recently seen, it was pretty good.
I've already seen Dredd. It says it right in the post you quote....Dude.. DUDE.
Go watch The Raid and Dredd now!
Yes, actually Gravity was the last movie I saw and I absolutely hated it. Inception was average and I did not care for District 9. The latter was made even worse because my ex-gf recently broke up with me and I lost my job and depressing movie as it was, it was the last thing I needed.
ok but countering with "well actually I haven't seen much TV either" doesn't really make the "tv is better than movies" stance more well-founded...No, my post says that I've watched mostly blockbuster films of the sci-fi, superhero, horror, etc. genre nor do I say I watch plenty of television. Actually, I don't have the capability to watch TV and usually have to use Netflix, Prime or Hulu when I can.
Also, Flight being garbage really is personal opinion. It was nominated for Best Original Screenplay and Best Actor (Denzel Washington). It generally received positive critical reviews. The movie was surprisingly better than I expected.
A lot of movies you listed I haven't seen, I admit. I'm not much for indie movies but I am willing to give it a chance so I'll have to check out some of those you listed. I have seen Social Network and yes, I did like that movie and even seen it twice. I also saw Scott Pilgrim and it was a fun ride while I was drunk. The choreography with FX was the best thing about it. But like I said, I tend to dislike most independent movies I've seen.
Oh, also saw you mention the Raid. I have not seen that but would like to. I have heard that Dredd is similar (story-wise) and, despite thinking it was going to be hot garbage, I actually liked Dredd. It was nothing special but compared to a lot of other action, sci-fi, etc. I've recently seen, it was pretty good.
When I think back, 2013 was so disappointing for me. I know listing off the movies I've seen and disliked would get me a lot of rolled eyes, but that's honestly how I feel. Again, I just want to re-iterate that I'm really talking about the last couple of years at least. I used to always prefer film over television.