Ether_Snake
å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®
Spoilers:
I thought Niko was a great character but they stretched him thin by forcing him to do missions for a bunch of people that have nothing to do with him. They used the cheap "we got something on you so shut up and just do the mission even if we didn't exist in your world just a few minutes ago" trick, and when it's not that they made it feel like Niko was hungry for money but they never really justified that. Niko felt like the kind of guy who wouldn't care much about money, yet if it was to help his cousin it should have been better explained.
Niko killed Vlad so Roman could be free from him and be with Mallorie, that was a good start. It was a stupid move, but it showed that Niko wasn't always thinking before acting, a side-effect of the violence he went through, especially if it is to help a friend or family.
But then it went down the crapper, it's like someone else wrote the rest of the game:
Niko didn't have to do any missions to provide Roman with a new house, out of gilt for him having lost his first one due to Niko's actions. THAT is what should have happened.
Niko never did missions to force someone out of a business to hand it over to Roman. THAT is what should happened. And it would all make sense with the game's possible ending too because Roman at the end of the game pressures Niko to go for the money and deal with Dimitri.
Pretty much the whole game should have been about Niko doing bad to help make Roman's life better, only to make it worst/more dangerous/riskier everytime.
I thought Niko was a great character but they stretched him thin by forcing him to do missions for a bunch of people that have nothing to do with him. They used the cheap "we got something on you so shut up and just do the mission even if we didn't exist in your world just a few minutes ago" trick, and when it's not that they made it feel like Niko was hungry for money but they never really justified that. Niko felt like the kind of guy who wouldn't care much about money, yet if it was to help his cousin it should have been better explained.
Niko killed Vlad so Roman could be free from him and be with Mallorie, that was a good start. It was a stupid move, but it showed that Niko wasn't always thinking before acting, a side-effect of the violence he went through, especially if it is to help a friend or family.
But then it went down the crapper, it's like someone else wrote the rest of the game:
Niko didn't have to do any missions to provide Roman with a new house, out of gilt for him having lost his first one due to Niko's actions. THAT is what should have happened.
Niko never did missions to force someone out of a business to hand it over to Roman. THAT is what should happened. And it would all make sense with the game's possible ending too because Roman at the end of the game pressures Niko to go for the money and deal with Dimitri.
Pretty much the whole game should have been about Niko doing bad to help make Roman's life better, only to make it worst/more dangerous/riskier everytime.