But still though, acting high and mighty in the face of those who have chosen not to partake isn't right. People with amber alerts off aren't causing any harm, they just aren't doing any good.
There IS a difference.
But still though, acting high and mighty in the face of those who have chosen not to partake isn't right. People with amber alerts off aren't causing any harm, they just aren't doing any good.
There IS a difference.
Its not about you actively going out and looking for them. Its about you maybe noticing something that may help the case using the details provided in the amber alert. The reason they give you amber alerts for missing children that are 2-6 hours away I presume is because if they were kidnapped, the kidnappers may have gotten very far away from the kid's original location.
But still though, acting high and mighty in the face of those who have chosen not to partake isn't right. People with amber alerts off aren't causing any harm, they just aren't doing any good.
There IS a difference.
It's almost as if the sound is designed to relay the importance of a child being kidnapped in your community.
Same here i was kidding earlier about turning it off.Amber Alerts are extremely loud and annoying and I can understand why people would want to turn them off. On the other hand, if everyone turned them off the system would stop working. Which suggests that the best solution is to turn off Amber Alerts but then pretend you didn't and also loudly argue that everyone else should leave them on.
Anyway, obviously I have Amber Alerts turned on and you should too.
All they do is give you a license plate number along with the make/model of the car. Not a lot that I can do with that information.....it's generally not on my mind after a little while.
Except the alerts I got were never in my community and are usually for towns/areas an hour or more away from me. I keep the alerts turned on, but I'm not going to lie when I say it gets annoying getting an amber alert for a person in a town 40 minutes away that I never visit for any reason.
But still though, acting high and mighty in the face of those who have chosen not to partake isn't right. People with amber alerts off aren't causing any harm, they just aren't doing any good.
There IS a difference.
Florida, turned them off this week
I've been having trouble sleeping already and one of them woke me up a couple days ago. Not worth.
Just so you guys know, Amber alerts have saved 800 lives:
http://www.amberalert.gov/statistics.htm
So yeah. Probably should keep 'em on.
They aren't expecting you to track the person down like Jodie Foster. The idea is that everyone at once within a certain radius stops what they are doing and looks around at the cars nearby. If you have it off you will never know if you were stopped behind one of these missing kids at an intersection when their alert went out.
Amber Alerts encompass way more than the mobile phone alert we are talking bout about
Amber Alerts encompass way more than the mobile phone alert we are talking about
They aren't expecting you to track the person down like Jodie Foster. The idea is that everyone at once within a certain radius stops what they are doing and looks around at the cars nearby. If you have it off you will never know if you were stopped behind one of these missing kids at an intersection when their alert went out.
But are the people shaming the people who turn them off, out looking for the kids?
I leave mine on but one day I got 3 of the same one
You honestly can't see a situation where someone would take a child and drive out of their town?
Just so you guys know, Amber alerts have saved 800 lives:
http://www.amberalert.gov/statistics.htm
So yeah. Probably should keep 'em on.
On the other hand, if everyone turned them off the system would stop working..
So the correct behaviour for someone getting a 3AM Amber Alert for a community 5 hours away is that you should stop what you were doing (sleeping) and look around the cars nearby (out your bedroom window) to see if the kidnapper is there?
But your driving example presents an interesting moral dilemma. If I get an Amber Alert while driving, should I check my phone? If I don't, I am -- in the words of this thread -- cancerous and an asshole, but if I do, I endanger myself and others on the road.
But still though, acting high and mighty in the face of those who have chosen not to partake isn't right. People with amber alerts off aren't causing any harm, they just aren't doing any good.
There IS a difference.
So the correct behaviour for someone getting a 3AM Amber Alert for a community 5 hours away is that you should stop what you were doing (sleeping) and look around the cars nearby (out your bedroom window) to see if the kidnapper is there?
But your driving example presents an interesting moral dilemma. If I get an Amber Alert while driving, should I check my phone? If I don't, I am -- in the words of this thread -- cancerous and an asshole, but if I do, I endanger myself and others on the road.
Are people really getting amber alerts often enough to consider turning them off? I feel like I go months without getting one.
It's acting high and mighty to be pro-amber alerts?
Saving lives and retrieval are two very different distinctions.Just so you guys know, Amber alerts have saved 800 lives:
http://www.amberalert.gov/statistics.htm
So yeah. Probably should keep 'em on.
The 30% and 25% figures represent absolutely harrowing cases potentially being prevented, but to celebrate the successes of the program it's important to not overstate it's efficacy. Nobody in this thread actively wants children to be murdered.wikpedia said:A Scripps Howard study of the 233 AMBER Alerts issued in the United States in 2004 found that most issued alerts did not meet the Department of Justice's criteria. Fully 50% (117 alerts) were categorized by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children as being "family abductions", very often a parent involved in a custody dispute. There were 48 alerts for children who had not been abducted at all, but were lost, ran away, involved in family misunderstandings (for example, two instances where the child was with grandparents), or as the result of hoaxes. Another 23 alerts were issued in cases where police did not know the name of the allegedly abducted child, often as the result of misunderstandings by witnesses who reported an abduction.
Seventy of the 233 AMBER Alerts issued in 2004 (30%) were actually children taken by strangers or who were unlawfully travelling with adults other than their legal guardians.[68]
According to the 2014 Amber Alert Report, 186 Amber Alerts were issued in the US, involving 239 children. 60 (25%) were taken by strangers or people other than their legal guardians.
"25 children have been rescued because of Wireless Emergency Alerts!"
Out of 800 rescues, 25 can be linked to the wireless alert system. Roughly 3%. The effectiveness of the Amber Alert system doesn't really seem to be at all linked to cell notifications. The effectiveness of wireless alerts is probably questionable if these statistics hash out.
Uh. Think about that one for like, just a second.
Also in many states, checking your texts and messages while driving is illegal
JUST BECAUSE EVERY SINGLE AMBER ALERT DOESNT APPLY TO YOU DOESNT MEAN THAT NO AMBER ALERT WILL EVER APPLY TO YOU.
fuck this conversation. you guys justify it however you want.
JUST BECAUSE EVERY SINGLE AMBER ALERT DOESNT APPLY TO YOU DOESNT MEAN THAT NO AMBER ALERT WILL EVER APPLY TO YOU.
fuck this conversation. you guys justify it however you want.
You guys have rationalized convenience above human life.
There is nothing TO justify, looking objectively, the points some of us critics have raised are factual.
Exactly!
The systems is flawed.
There is nothing TO justify, looking objectively, the points some of us critics have raised are factual.
So you think its the right thing to do, to turn off an alert because it annoys you even though there is a very small chance...(less than .01%) that you may in fact be able to assist in the recovery of a child that has been abducted?
"25 children have been rescued because of Wireless Emergency Alerts!"
Out of 800 rescues, 25 can be linked to the wireless alert system. Roughly 3%. The effectiveness of the Amber Alert system doesn't really seem to be at all linked to cell notifications. The effectiveness of wireless alerts is probably questionable if these statistics hash out.
1. Law enforcement must confirm that an abduction has taken place.
2. The child must be at risk of serious injury or death.
3. There must be sufficient descriptive information of child, captor, or captor's vehicle to issue an alert.
4. The child must be under 18 years of age.
Many law enforcement agencies have not used #2 as a criterion, resulting in many parental abductions triggering an Amber Alert, where the child is not known or assumed to be at risk of serious injury or death. In 2013, West Virginia passed Skylar's Law to eliminate #1 as a criterion for triggering an Amber Alert.