• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

This girl just posted this on a Popular Social Network™

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uh... you'd get that question pretty much anywhere. As a fellow lesbian in the Bible Belt THIS IS PRETTY MUCH THE LEAST OF YOUR WORRIES
Now that's interesting. How do you let women know that you're trying to get into their pants? Are there misunderstandings and does hilarity ensue?

On topic... unless you're hardcore butch and/or flamboyant people are gonna assume that you're hetero. That's just how the statistics work out. Why take offense at something that's so innocuous?
 
Sorry she had just posted this following it:

9UuLU.png


It was just too much. I rolled my eyes, lost control, and made this thread.

edit: Also, she's straight. Just a feminist.
 
Nurse should have asked, "Do you have any sexual partners" or "Are you sexually active."

It really must suck living in a world where 98 percent of the population is different from you on a fundamental level.

It was just too much. I rolled my eyes, lost control, and made this thread.

edit: Also, she's straight. Just a feminist.

What the fuck? Well, fuck her then. Here I am being diplomatic and understanding and this chump is out looking for trouble. For shame.
 
Sorry she had just posted this following it:

9UuLU.png


It was just too much. I rolled my eyes, lost control, and made this thread.

You know the wonderful thing about the internet is if you don't like something, you don't have to look at it. Just unsubscribe from her feed.
 
So is the nurse supposed to ask if she's "dating/seeing someone" or just not at all? I mean, it makes since that we shouldn't assume someone's sexuality like that. I suppose it's something to think about for the future although that's something I would never ask some random stranger. Seems like a pretty small thing to whine/get preachy about though.

Chick's trying hard to be a feminist/atheist/alt person/whatever and I respect that but damn, slow your roll. Who's in the wrong? Is anyone in the wrong? Is this really a big deal? Is there a lesson to be learned here?

why don't you post this on the girl's wall instead of passive aggressively posting it to neogaf?
 
Eh, OP's friend sounds kinda high strung.


Disclaimer: I am atheist and extremely pro-LGBT rights. This is just such a meaningless little thing to get pissy about.
 
Also, she's straight

bah ha ha ha ha ha okay NOW I'm kinda glad you posted this thread

kinda

Oh no asking the straights to ever-so-subtly modify their language is sooooooo hard on you guys, I'm so glad I have homo privilege!

In defense of the nurse, I imagine "Are you sexually active?" is not a welcome question among many single women in the bible belt, even in a doctor's office. Just playing devil's advocate here as I agree with you in principle.

edit: I just saw the "are you dating anyone or are you married" option, yeah that's a good choice for that region.
 
I don't see what's so difficult in changing the question to be gender neutral. Really, if we're going to have acceptance for a variety of sexual orientations, the norm should always be neutral. Establishing one particular expectation as the norm will only slow that progress down.

I know for some of you folk, it doesn't seem like a huge change, but it is. But it's really a tiny effort that makes a big difference in the long run.
 
Its my experience that non-gay/feminist/do-gooders etc are the ones that get more wound up over shit like this than those that might have a legitimate reason to..

For example, some do-gooder decided the Fairy Penguins at Phillip Island could be offensive to gays so had the name changed to Little Penguins.

One of my gay mates even commented it was an example of political correctness just gone stupid
 
Doctor asked me if I had a girlfriend once and I told him that I had a boyfriend, and his questions about my health continued as normal. I can see how someone might be a bit miffed that it's not 'inclusive', but it's ultimately not a huge deal. I pretty much assume everyone's straight (until I realize how obvious they are or they make a comment that tips me off.)
 
Treating people as less important just because they're statistically less common is gross.

Less important? How is it doing that? It's assuming that someone is likely to be a certain thing because the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of that being true.

Like if I assume that you like pizza is that a diss on people who don't like pizza? How about fucking no.
 
Less important? How is it doing that? It's assuming that someone is likely to be a certain thing because the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of that being true.
It's easier to assume everyone is like you rather than just barely altering the question to be more inclusive.

Like if I assume that you like pizza is that a diss on people who don't like pizza? How about fucking no.
No one's being made to feel less important or not normal if you talk about liking pizza.
 
So is the nurse supposed to ask if she's "dating/seeing someone" or just not at all? I mean, it makes since that we shouldn't assume someone's sexuality like that. I suppose it's something to think about for the future although that's something I would never ask some random stranger. Seems like a pretty small thing to whine/get preachy about though.

Chick's trying hard to be a feminist/atheist/alt person/whatever and I respect that but damn, slow your roll. Who's in the wrong? Is anyone in the wrong? Is this really a big deal? Is there a lesson to be learned here?

BIBLE VERSES ON THE WALL

IT'S LIKE THE LAST EXORCISM IN HERE
 
Someone posts an inane and perhaps oversensitive status on facebook. You start an equally inane thread dumping on them on a website they presumably don't frequent, including follow-up posts where I assume we're supposed to be laughing at her taste in music or something.

Who's the asshole here?
 
Pizza isn't just cheese and meat you know.

I guarantee you that if someone is buying pizza for a large group of people that it will be pepperoni. I will base this one 30 years of having pizza bought on my behalf when I am sick and fucking tired of pepperoni.


This isn't worth your outrage and ridiculous analogies. Gay people exist, and it's decent to consider that when asking questions about sexual orientation to a stranger.

Wow, what a bigot. People with allergies don't exist now? My god.
 
Now what do we do with people who have sexual-orientation allergies???

Some are a bit too sensitive - how do they cope. Who's thinking of the children??

You can be allergic to semen and stuff so that's a definite possibility. Luckily, I'm not so I can drown my sorrows in glorious semen.

It's usually cheese...

We need to take a vote on this because that is just patent nonsense. Nobody orders a full order of fucking cheese pizzas. You might get one or two but definitely not a full order.

I also used to work at a pizza place for about a year so I have professional experience to back me up here.
 
Sorry she had just posted this following it:


It was just too much. I rolled my eyes, lost control, and made this thread.

edit: Also, she's straight. Just a feminist.

I don't understand why a picture of a magazine bothers you. Now YOU seem like the asshole. Maybe unsubscribe from her feed like a sane person?

Also, this anti-feminist shit on the internet is fucking obnoxious. Just because some people are assholes doesn't mean posting "lol feminism" or whatever makes you something different.
 
I guarantee you that if someone is buying pizza for a large group of people that it will be pepperoni. I will base this one 30 years of having pizza bought on my behalf when I am sick and fucking tired of pepperoni.




Wow, what a bigot. People with allergies don't exist now? My god.

Yeah let's compare dietary choices to people's orientation. That's fair.
 
What about someone who is lactose intolerant? Or allergic to cheese? Or a vegatarian? Or wheat allergy?

For the record: As a vegetarian, I have never gone without pizza. :)
Also, this metaphor is sort of damning, because it equates pizza taste with a highly discriminated against minority. I actually don't think people need to be gender neutral all the time. I don't agree with the girl in the OP... but lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater just because we liked south park in middle school or whatever.
 
It's not a choice if it's a biological disorder.

Now you're just being snide. Ignoring the OP for a second there is nothing wrong with making questions more inclusive and to stop defaulting certain things so that the non-majority is no longer constantly considered of the "other."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom