• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

This is how you don't defend Atheism.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never felt the need to defend Atheism. It's not an ideology, it just means you don't believe in god.

It doesn't matter whether he actually does exist or whether the morals of a particular religion are right. I just don't believe he exists.

Every belief system has, and requires, apologetics.
 
He seriously calls the old Christian guy goyim at 03:57? WHAT. THE. FUCK. How do you get away with that kind of shit in this day and age?

EDIT: Yeah, I'm done listening to this trash.
 
But atheism isn't a belief system. Hell it's the lack of a particular belief.

No, atheism refers to a lack of theistic beliefs, i.e. you don't believe in the existence of an almighty god who exercises power over human affairs. In other words, atheism is still a belief system, since atheists still share a set of common beliefs.

What you refer to is something closer to agnosticism, i.e. the desire not to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge. An agnostic acquires the knowledge needed to function in this world and does not bother with pursuing any more.
 
..so was he jewish or an atheist?

anyway i have a strong dislike for anyone yelling nonsense like that.







but he did make me laugh so i appreciate that.
 
No, atheism refers to a lack of theistic beliefs, i.e. you don't believe in the existence of an almighty god who exercises power over human affairs. In other words, atheism is still a belief system, since atheists still share a set of common beliefs.

What you refer to is something closer to agnosticism, i.e. the desire not to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge. An agnostic acquires the knowledge needed to function in this world and does not bother with pursuing any more.

If I'm not agnostic then what am I? I want to know if there is one. But I don't think there is proof (of a god or lack of)either way xD
 
No, atheism refers to a lack of theistic beliefs, i.e. you don't believe in the existence of an almighty god who exercises power over human affairs. In other words, atheism is still a belief system, since atheists still share a set of common beliefs.

What you refer to is something closer to agnosticism, i.e. the desire not to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge. An agnostic acquires the knowledge needed to function in this world and does not bother with pursuing any more.

with lack of a particular belief i meant the bolded.

Not believing is by definition not a belief. And a System cannot consist of only one axiom.
 
But atheism isn't a belief system. Hell it's the lack of a particular belief.

sturgess_atheism_03.jpg


atheist-bus.jpg








128_21_01_10_9_30_05.jpeg


You should come up with a new word to distance yourself from people who take their atheism seriously.
 
But atheism isn't a belief system. Hell it's the lack of a particular belief.

be·lief
noun \bə-ˈlēf\
Definition of BELIEF
1
: a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing
2
: something believed; especially : a tenet or body of tenets held by a group
3
: conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence

Seems like a belief to me.
 
The way he says "atheism forever" near the beginning is so weird. I can't stop listening to it. I want to sample it for something.
 
"It amazes me to find an intelligent person who fights against something which he does not at all believe exists."

That doesn't make any sense.

Nobody is fighting the imaginary being, but the attempts by people who believe in him to legislate religious practices and values. Those people definitely exist.
 
My god was that cringe-worthy, I can't watch it for more than 5-seconds, regardless, let the religious protest all they want, their beliefs are just that, beliefs, you can always counter-protest, don't lose your cool though.
 
You should come up with a new word to distance yourself from people who take their atheism seriously.

I don't want to insult anyone but the quote Mammoth posted summarizes how i think about this:

"It amazes me to find an intelligent person who fights against something which he does not at all believe exists."

Fighting for separation of church and state, against discrimination based on faith ect. does not require the banner of atheism. I don't cherish the fact that i don't believe in god, it's not an achievment, it doesn't make me a better (or a worse) person. Just like believing in god doesn't.



Seems like a belief to me.

No it's not. Unless i'm horribly mistaken Atheism means the lack of belief in a deity/deities.

Believing in god is not like Gravity, it's not observable, it's an abstract statement just like you can make a non provable abstract statement about anything. I don't need to qualify the non existence of the giant spaghetti monster as belief.
 
I don't want to insult anyone but the quote Mammoth posted summarizes how i think about this:



Fighting for separation of church and state, against discrimination based on faith ect. does not require the banner of atheism. I don't cherish the fact that i don't believe in god, it's not an achievment, it doesn't make me a better (or a worse) person. Just like believing in god doesn't.

Well, that's you.

Do you deny that there are atheists who think and behave otherwise?
 
Lack of belief in a "creator(s)" is not so much a rigid belief as it is more of an inference/assumption based on a set of observational facts.

People can take Atheism as seriously as they want. Its a way of rationalize life and the nature of existence.

Now when it becomes an organized movement, then you got something that's no different than a religious movement. Which is both hypocritical and nauseating.

Atheism doesn't need defending. It refuses to acknowledge the existence of a higher power.

I mean how can you prove something you don't believe exists doesn't exist? The mental fucking gymnastics you need to rationalize that question in itself is absurd.
 
Well, that's you.

Do you deny that there are atheists who think and behave otherwise?

Of course not, why would I? But if you call yourself an atheist and you establish a belief system out of not believing in god...that takes about as much creativity as actually believing in a religion. Or to put it differently, they emulate the behaviour they are so adamantly critisising/ distancing themselves from.

^Derwind puts it nicely. Though i wouldn't call it nauseating. Part of the reason it happens is that people feel the need to belong, some also have a persecution complex. And some are persecuted.
 
Of course not, why would I? But if you call yourself an atheist and you establish a belief system out of not believing in god...that takes about as much creativity as actually believing in a religion. Or to put it differently, they emulate the behaviour they are so adamantly critisising/ distancing themselves from.

But that is not how it works with most atheists..or at least the ones I know.

What I am about to say is anecdotal:
First of all...we don't even call ourselves atheists. As long as it is not brought up in a discussion..there's no need to mention we don't believe in a god. Not believing in somethings does not establish a belief system...I don't understand where you get that from.

However I do agree with you that certain types of atheists emulate the behaviour of certain types of christians. However those kind of atheists differ as much from the 'regular' atheists as the Westborough Church differs from 'regular' christians
 
But that is not how it works with most atheists..or at least the ones I know.

What I am about to say is anecdotal:
First of all...we don't even call ourselves atheists. As long as it is not brought up in a discussion..there's no need to mention we don't believe in a god. Not believing in somethings does not establish a belief system...I don't understand where you get that from.

However I do agree with you that certain types of atheists emulate the behaviour of certain types of christians. However those kind of atheists differ as much from the 'regular' atheists as the Westborough Church differs from 'regular' christians

I think just like you. I've argued the bolded a few times in this thread.

I was just talking about the types in the picture bombadil posted.
 
That doesn't make any sense.

Nobody is fighting the imaginary being, but the attempts by people who believe in him to legislate religious practices and values. Those people definitely exist.

If it was solely against the legislators and people that are attempting to legislate religion I'd completely agree with you. But that's simply not the case in the real world.
 
"It amazes me to find an intelligent person who fights against something which he does not at all believe exists."
The reason this quote is fucking bonkers is that belief in this particular nonexistent thing has had ruinous social effects throughout history, continuing on into modern times, where it has directly enabled nonsense like the Bush administration's support of abstinence-only education and bigots' attempts to get their hate enshrined in law under the guise of traditional values. Any nonbeliever with two eyes and a brain can see this and be motivated to take a stand against it. (Preferably in a constructive manner, like promoting science and sane, reality-based public policy.)

Gandhi did a damn good impression of a fool with that quote. A surprisingly common talent among intelligent public figures who have taken it upon themselves to criticize nonbelief without bothering to understand it.

Hey! Look! More proof that nutso exist in all facets of society and culture!

Who knew?
People who act like religion isn't a hideously effective incubator for nuttery are bad at pattern recognition.
 
The reason this quote is fucking bonkers is that belief in this particular nonexistent thing has had ruinous social effects throughout history, continuing on into modern times, where it has directly enabled nonsense like the Bush administration's support of abstinence-only education and bigots' attempts to get their hate enshrined in law under the guise of traditional values. Any nonbeliever with two eyes and a brain can see this and be motivated to take a stand against it. (Preferably in a constructive manner, like promoting science and sane, reality-based public policy.)

Gandhi did a damn good impression of a fool with that quote. A surprisingly common talent among intelligent public figures who have taken it upon themselves to criticize nonbelief without bothering to understand it.

No, sir. You're wrong.

Atheism has nothing to do with secularism.

You know how Clarke said religion hijacked morality?

Atheism hijacked secularism.

It's not impossible for a religious person to be secular. And it's not impossible for a person who believes in god to be non-religious.

So why do these organizations, which purport to be secular, keep bashing the belief in a god? Why do these organizations keep associating a belief in god with a belief in theocracy?
 
No, sir. You're wrong.

Atheism has nothing to do with secularism.

You know how Clarke said religion hijacked morality?

Atheism hijacked secularism.

It's not impossible for a religious person to be secular. And it's not impossible for a person who believes in god to be non-religious.

So why do these organizations, which purport to be secular, keep bashing the belief in a god? Why do these organizations keep associating a belief in god with a belief in theocracy?
A mess of strawmen in here. Where did I put my scythe?
 
I'd rather just describe them with a word that distances then from me. Luckily, such a word already exists: They're assholes.

Bingo!..

The man has a right to say how he feels, as a ( admittingly twisted a bit) Christian I can respect that, but for god sakes, someone get him some pants.
 
No, sir. You're wrong.

Atheism has nothing to do with secularism.

You know how Clarke said religion hijacked morality?

Atheism hijacked secularism.

It's not impossible for a religious person to be secular. And it's not impossible for a person who believes in god to be non-religious.

So why do these organizations, which purport to be secular, keep bashing the belief in a god? Why do these organizations keep associating a belief in god with a belief in theocracy?

Arthur C Clarke is rolling in his grave right now.
 
A mess of strawmen in here. Where did I put my scythe?

Haha.

I know how your mind works.

Edit: I've said this before.

I don't understand why most atheists aren't nihilist. I don't have a lot of respect for people who are atheists but aren't nihilists, especially the ones who vocally claim that they arrived at their position through logic. Take your logic a little further.
 
Haha.

I know how your mind works.
I strongly doubt it, if your previous posts are any indication.

Edit: I've said this before.

I don't understand why most atheists aren't nihilist. I don't have a lot of respect for people who are atheists but aren't nihilists, especially the ones who vocally claim that they arrived at their position through logic. Take your logic a little further.
Because it's possible to find meaning in one's daily life and local context, in spite of the recognition that the universe is purposeless? I mean, you don't suddenly start thinking like an alien and being immune to emotion when you shun superstition and adopt a pragmatic view of life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom