I think at this point, the Wii U might be absolutely beyond saving due to the absolutely horrid word of mouth that games journalists are putting out on it. I honestly think that has been the single most damaging factor on this whole situation.
I say this because the other day, a friend of mine said that they could pick up a Wii for $150, and was asking if this was a good deal or not. It didn't come with any games, and I'm not sure if it came with controllers or not. Now, I'm not aware that $150 is a good price or not, but that's beyond the actual point. When he posted this, this was the day that the $200 Nintendoland Deluxe bundle was shown to be $200. I suggested that he consider that, as Nintendoland is an AMAZING couch multiplayer game, the system could play all Wii games, and he'd effectively be getting a better system for just the cost of the game he'd be playing.
His response? There was no way in hell he would ever get a Wii U, citing reasons like "Wii has cheaper local multiplayer (...wut?), and the system was already abandoned (...wasn't the Wii literally abandoned like 3 years ago, instead of being on Nintendo-only life support?).
Nevermind the fact that neither of those reasons make any sense, this guy was completely against getting a Wii U even though it's just a completely better buy given the price he was considering. And no, he never once mentioned Gamecube support, nor have I ever heard him mention one. He didn't want one, even though it would do -everything- he wanted it to do, and then some.
This is absolutely shocking to me -- Nintendo's problem isn't wholly marketing, it's that the entire gaming journalism scene has it out to completely destroy Nintendo's reputation, to the point where a no brainer purchase becomes completely out of the picture. What the hell happened here? I seriously hope that "Nintendoomed" doesn't end up being a self fulfilling prophecy, because that would be some major bullshit, as the Wii U is, IMO, a wonderful machine.