Not as bad as underage dick pics but still
this is trying way too hard to be a family guy like cartoon.EDIT: Whoops, posted the wrong one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvQFnK5FWZY
Hallelujah.
Hallelujah.
Hallelujah.
Hallel-oooooo-jah.
10 seconds in and I'm embarrassed to have ever played a video game.
OK, that's good.
For someone who has been Internet famous for a good while, that guy sure doesn't have a lot of YouTube followers.
It's pretty close. At best it's not very flattering for his character design skills.Never found the image you quote to be particularly bad.
i mean it's most likely inspired by it, but it's just a very simple and stereotypical looking punk girl design, nothing to get protective about.
You know the most offensive thing about the animated series? Besides the series itself?
It wasn't free. It'd be one thing if it was a shitty cartoon on Newgrounds, but no, people had to pay to see it.
Of course, the moment someone bought a copy, it went up on torrent sites. Now it's all over YouTube in both normal and annotated formats
http://i.imgur.com/TZoQVIi.jpg
My sides
I wouldn't go that far.
From what I've been reading, it's somewhat justified. But I don't think I've ever seen GAF collectively gang up on someone this badly.
Note: I am not defending Buckley, I am just genuinely surprised by the vitriol I'm seeing. I knew he was disliked, but to what extent I did not expect.
Fish isn't as bad as Dyack, and neither were remotely as bad as Buckley.I think Phil Fish and Denis Dyack get it worse. Although to be fair there are a decent amount of people who stick up for Fish. Dyack gets way more hate than Buckley and Fish though, not even really comparable.
There are a lot more parodies of that strip than I ever imagined.
All of them are amazing.
![]()
![]()
Pure goldAlright, if we're going to do loss.jpeg parodies.
![]()
Fish isn't as bad as Dyack, and neither were remotely as bad as Buckley.
Buckley wishes his only crime was he was an asshole or hyped up a game the internet made fun of.
You know the most offensive thing about the animated series? Besides the series itself?
It wasn't free. It'd be one thing if it was a shitty cartoon on Newgrounds, but no, people had to pay to see it.
Of course, the moment someone bought a copy, it went up on torrent sites. Now it's all over YouTube in both normal and annotated formats
Never found the image you quote to be particularly bad.
i mean it's most likely inspired by it, but it's just a very simple and stereotypical looking punk girl design, nothing to get protective about.
Never found the image you quote to be particularly bad.
i mean it's most likely inspired by it, but it's just a very simple and stereotypical looking punk girl design, nothing to get protective about.
So much hate in this thread. I've never really been into these webcomics, but other than this one being a little bit shit, what's the crime here? Has the creator been involved in some other sort of "scandal" or something?