dr3upmushroom said:
It's a general rule anyway, but in this thread especially you should really read before posting.
I've skimmed through the thread.
The issue is kinda like this;
some people derive pleasure from been spontaneously complimented.
There is some merit to sexual advances that occur spontaneously.
However, not all people appreciate this.
Some view it as harassment.
If we push towards strict boundaries; you're going to see a reduction of the behaviour - which means less people will derive pleasure out of the spontaneity.
But also means less people will be harassed.
Is it possible to be spontaneous and still respect boundaries? Maybe. But it requires a high awareness of the situation and context and even been able to read subtle signals.
This can lead to confusion
And they're not skills that all (or even most) people have.
So this kinda thing, it's a bit of a see saw; to give some people comfort of not been harassed, you take away from some people who interpret what the others interpret as harassments as compliments.
In my opinion, the more nebulous issue at hand is that with the conservative it's all a harassment mind set at play; more spontaneous and uninvited signals are interpreted negatively, even when unjustifiable. It is essentially a negative feedback loop.
The externality that this creates is that new sexual selection dynamics come into play - which can alienate a large group of people. I mean... you may have experienced or heard of a phenomenon where women have to chase after guys now, or where its become much harder to meet people. These are the kinds of consequences that result from such a social cultural stance.
In my view... a good solution always calls for more nuance and subtelty. Been mindful of where boundaries are drawn and what exceptions and grey areas are still ok - otherwise you end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater - the positive externalities of behaviour gets thrown out with the negative externalities.