Maybe you live in a well off area? All that golden hello and recruitment drives for teachers exist because there is a shortage of math and science teachers. Let alone good ones. I don't think it's an isolated problem on my end. I welcome the new GCSE in computing, but only a third of current teachers are qualified to teach it... hopefully they're able to train enough new good ones to make it a success. And my school was fairly middle of the road, there are worse, but mostly better ones in the area (faith or grammar schools)
surprised to not see norway and sweden up there with finland. usually the nordic countries hang out together on top of lists.
Does this list only take into account public education? The US' public school system is just awful, but is almost without question the best nation in terms of post-secondary education. For example, fourteen of the top 20 universities, as ranked by US News and World Report, are in the United States.
Also worth noting that pretty much all schools (including every university) are free in Finland.
At what are we finns not the best at?
English, evidently.
You can see the criteria at the link. Mostly primary and secondary education, but tertiary weighs in a bit through:
- Public expenditure per pupil as % of GDP per capita. Tertiary
- Graduation rate at tertiary level
- Labour force. Tertiary attainment
- Unemployment of those with tertiary level education over total unemployment
English, evidently.
The US is #1 in marketing?
Agreed.Lol @ South Korea and Japan.
Yeah, great education systems there. A complete focus on rote memorization and a progression system where your life is fucking over if you mess up on a single test.
Lol @ South Korea and Japan.
Yeah, great education systems there. A complete focus on rote memorization and a progression system where your life is fucking over if you mess up on a single test.
Believe it or not, the U.S. actually has the best higher education in the world, especially in research universities.
So that's why you're behind us.We (Sweden) won't score any higher in the coming years either with the school politics going on here. The teacher profession just simply doesn't have the status it deserves.
People study for a couple of years to become teachers and then don't get the pay others with similar length educations get so who want to become a teacher really? Except for a couple that sees it as their call.
And there aren't as many teachers needed already, due to schools not being funded properly, so the classes are too large. There is also some kind of private owned school experimentation going on based purely on ideology.
Ahh well, when I have kids one day hopefully things have changed.
Poland is awesome.Poland (my country) is 14th IN THE WORLD? WATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT?
Poland (my country) is 14th IN THE WORLD? WATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT?
This is not really important. I'm sure the most important factor was the "learning culture". Asian countries put EXTREME importance on the notion of learning and excelling academically, much more than Europeans do.
Maybe in Ivy league, the rest is average.
Asian countries put EXTREME importance on the notion of learning and excelling academically, much more than Europeans do.
Crap, now I got the Finland privilege too.
Isn't Finland in the top on those too?
Maybe in Ivy league, the rest is average.
Maybe in Ivy league, the rest is average.
I see. It's a shame that neither university quality or university quantity are taken into account, as I'm quite sure the US leads the world in both those respects.
Believe it or not, the U.S. actually has the best higher education in the world, especially in research universities.
I was expecting a much lower rank for Portugal. But 27th place still hurts like a motherf***er.
I can only speak for Sweden, but we completely fucked up our education system in the mid 90s.
First we changed it so that no grades are given until grade 8, because you know "children should be encouraged not graded". Which has of course resulted in a situation where the teachers just let the kids move through the system without really learning anything since there is no formal mechanism (such as failing tests) to hold them back leaving it completely up to the teachers to make sure every student learns what he or she should. So, when a kid finally gets his grades in the 8th grade and it's apparent that he hasn't learnt what he should have learnt he only has a year and a half left to make sure he passes all subjects he has to pass in order to be able to continue to high school.
Does this list only take into account public education? The US' public school system is just awful, but is almost without question the best nation in terms of post-secondary education. For example, fourteen of the top 20 universities, as ranked by US News and World Report, are in the United States.
The other day I was talking to a Korean friend of mine who had just gotten back from working at Samsung in Seoul. He was complaining about how the people working there who had gotten PhDs in South Korea were not as good as the typical PhDs in the US. His complaint was that the S.K.-educated students would work really long hours on tasks you gave them, but lacked the imagination and ability to synthesize and create new ideas and develop novel research.
This is a sentiment I've actually heard expressed on many different occasions from PhD students from South and East Asia. When I ask them to compare their education in the US to that of their home country, they tell me that they feel like their classmates who were educated in the US are a lot more creative and that their own education focused on drills that were good for memorization, but that there was little emphasis on fostering creativity.
One of the weaknesses of large-scale standardized tests is that it is very easy to write and grade questions that probe lower-level cognitive skills like memorization, understanding, and application and very difficult to write and grade questions that probe higher-level skills like judgment and synthesis. This makes me wary of primarily using standardized test scores to make such broad statements as one educational system is flat-out "better" than another. I do think the information we get from such tests is valuable, but that it is important to limit the scope of the conclusions we draw from them to what they are actually testing. In this case, I would say that there are probably more components to what we would consider a good educational system than just things like basic math and reading skills and college enrollment levels. Probably we want to look more towards the scientific, technological, and cultural achievements being produced by the people who went through that educational system.
Maybe in Ivy league, the rest is average.
I've heard the same thing about Japanese educational system. My SO who is a teacher over there also complained to me how narrow minded students can sometimes be. They have a hard time expressing their own ideas. One good news is, they are making a new curriculum where students will be forced to give their opinions, read and understand in a more profound way, all in attempt to stimulate and correct the flaws they have acquired through their education.
Singapore is the biggest surprize , good for them
It's a problem endemic to East Asia. Their education systems are fantastic at producing engineers and programmers (the people who "put things together") but not the architects and designers (the people who "devise" things.)
I think it is the same thing with Singapore as well... We're good at mass producing engineers who are good at sciences and maths. Most of these engineers end up having to take on other jobs because the demand is not as much as the supply.
In Portugal we call it "Eduquês", a derogatory term for "Education Sciences"/ Pedagogy (not sure if this is the right term).
Too much focus about the student must have fun while learning, cannot fail and left back (no retentions) because is too traumatizing for them (tears), text books full of comics and infantilizing how High School students should learn.
"Critics of the education system, including some parents, state that the education system is too specialised, rigid, and elitist. Often, these criticisms state that there is little emphasis on creative thinking, unlike education systems in other societies, such as those in the United States."
I thought that you guys would have "inherited" the English education system in full.
According to Wikipedia:
"Critics of the education system, including some parents, state that the education system is too specialised, rigid, and elitist. Often, these criticisms state that there is little emphasis on creative thinking, unlike education systems in other societies, such as those in the United States."
Does the list count Taiwan as part of China, or is their education system just or as good?