Anasui Kishibe
Banned
agreed, Shriek 1 was on tv yesterday and I died inside at the atrocious jokes
these posters are GOD. I want pig now, my favourite character
these posters are GOD. I want pig now, my favourite character
Forceatowulf said:Oh god, that annoying cowgirl chick is back? ugh
huh.NetMapel said:Spoiler for the new toy:http://newsinfilm.com/images//2009/05/toystory3bear.jpg
Pixar has always done stuff like that. Dug the dog was in Ratatouille. Nemo the fish was in Monster Inc... etc
Why is everyone calling it Shriek?Anasui Kishibe said:agreed, Shriek 1 was on tv yesterday and I died inside at the atrocious jokes
these posters are GOD. I want pig now, my favourite character
FINE-LINE said:Slinky Dog without Jim Varney? But how? Why?
Blair said:Come on, we all wept like bitches at her song in 2.
Blackace said:Donkey has been in them all.. and 2 was pretty fun with Puss!
Dali said:I'm probably in the minority here, but I'm not looking forward to this at all. Toy Story doesn't need a sequel. More importantly, Pixar aren't so creatively bankrupt so as to have to shit them out, in anticipation of a sure-fire success, like DW and the Shrek series.
Anasui Kishibe said:I also hope they finally get Andy a decent console. He was still playing the snes in, like, '98
Kozak said:Hes going college isn't he? He should have pictures of tits in his room.
Dali said:I'm probably in the minority here, but I'm not looking forward to this at all. Toy Story doesn't need a sequel. More importantly, Pixar aren't so creatively bankrupt so as to have to shit them out, in anticipation of a sure-fire success, like DW and the Shrek series.
Anasui Kishibe said:Hamm is definitely the funniest character to me. His sarcastic tone makes every line hilarious
Rex: It's the chicken man!
Buzz Lightyear: That's our guy!
Hamm: I knew there was somethin' I didn't like about that chicken.
Woody: What am I talking about? "Woody's Round-Up"! Oh, it's this great old T.V. show, and I was the star. See, look, that's me!
Hamm: This is weirdin' me out.
Hamm: Excuse me, ladies, but could any of you tell us where we might the Al of Al's Toy Barn?
Tour guide Barbie: I can help! I'm Tour Guide Barbie! Please keep your hands, arms, and accessories in the car, and no flash photogtaphy. Thank you.
Mr. Potato Head: I'm a married spud, I'm a married spud...
Hamm: Then make way for the single fellas.
Re-watch 2 and you should notice the differences in the lighting, shadows, and models in 3. Re-working the art style is just unnecessary though, you'd lose the charm of the originals.Kodiak said:I was kinda hoping the look and feel would be updated. Idk.
Looks virtually unchanged.
Buzz needs action.Forceatowulf said:Oh god, that annoying cowgirl chick is back? ugh
Forceatowulf said:Oh god, that annoying cowgirl chick is back? ugh
Probably never going to happen since MadTV is getting cancelledSanjuroTsubaki said:Is there any word on a sequel to Sex Toy Story?
It hasn't been canceled already? Jesus fucking christ!Guzim said:Probably never going to happen since MadTV is getting cancelled![]()
Guzim said:Probably never going to happen since MadTV is getting cancelled![]()
Rash said:Blake Clark as Slinky? Couldn't have made a better choice myself.
Catalix said:Buzz needs action.
megashock5 said:Except that Toy Story already had one sequel and it was every bit as good, if not better than the original.
I've learned to stop worrying about Pixar movies. I used to, but they never let me down so I stopped.
StoOgE said:Toy Story 2 was already made and was better than the original, even though both hold up well. I don't think Pixar is out to cash in on sure fire hits. Most of their movies do extremely well in the box office.
Pixar has only had one movie that let me down, and even that one (Cars) is better then 90% of the animated movies that have come out.
Dali said:I guess I mis-worded my post, even though my meaning should have been obvious considering the topic of this thread, ffs. I meant another sequel. It didn't need the first one, but it ended up okay. However decent this third one will be, I'd still wish for something original or at the very least something not already done twice before.
giga said:Re-watch 2 and you should notice the differences in the lighting, shadows, and models in 3. Re-working the art style is just unnecessary though, you'd lose the charm of the originals.
Comparison images*
StoOgE said:No, all of the Shrek movies are terrible, you were right to exclude them.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Actually, i think it went down more like, Pixar was fulfilling a 3 film contract for disney and Disney wanted TS2 to go to video. Disney checked in on their progress and was blown away at how well TS2 was for a straight to video release, so they asked Pixar to add some more to it (it was only 60 minutes originally) and prep it for theatrical release. I think the most obvious "padding" (altho i love all of it) is the completely unnecessary opening sequence with Buzz fighting his nemesis in a video game (on a SNES console, no less:lol ).
This would later lead to a dispute when Disney didn't want to include TS2 as part of the 3 film agreement since it was supposed to be DTV, while Pixar definitely wanted to include it in that agreement.
That's how I remember it, but I'm a lil fuzzy.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Actually, i think it went down more like, Pixar was fulfilling a 3 film contract for disney and Disney wanted TS2 to go to video. Disney checked in on their progress and was blown away at how well TS2 was for a straight to video release, so they asked Pixar to add some more to it (it was only 60 minutes originally) and prep it for theatrical release. I think the most obvious "padding" (altho i love all of it) is the completely unnecessary opening sequence with Buzz fighting his nemesis in a video game (on a SNES console, no less:lol ).
This would later lead to a dispute when Disney didn't want to include TS2 as part of the 3 film agreement since it was supposed to be DTV, while Pixar definitely wanted to include it in that agreement.
That's how I remember it, but I'm a lil fuzzy.
teruterubozu said:Andy must have OCD. How the fuck are his toys still shiny, spotless and new?
edit: And didn't Woody have a shitty stitch job on his arm (performed by Andy) at the end of 2?
Messypandas said:You can see one arms still stitched as opposed to the other:
I believe it was Disney arguing that sequels didn't apply to the original contract, not anything to do with its DTV origins.SpeedingUptoStop said:Actually, i think it went down more like, Pixar was fulfilling a 3 film contract for disney and Disney wanted TS2 to go to video. Disney checked in on their progress and was blown away at how well TS2 was for a straight to video release, so they asked Pixar to add some more to it (it was only 60 minutes originally) and prep it for theatrical release. I think the most obvious "padding" (altho i love all of it) is the completely unnecessary opening sequence with Buzz fighting his nemesis in a video game (on a SNES console, no less:lol ).
This would later lead to a dispute when Disney didn't want to include TS2 as part of the 3 film agreement since it was supposed to be DTV, while Pixar definitely wanted to include it in that agreement.
That's how I remember it, but I'm a lil fuzzy.
in terms of the overall plot, it feels extraneous. In it's final incarnation, it makes sense and it is wonderfully done, but if I were to imagine a portion of the film that seems like it could easily be cut, it'd be the opener.Dan said:And how is that opening sequence unnecessary? It sets up Buzz's new abilities, Zurg and a dozen great gags about Rex trying to defeat him.
teruterubozu said:Andy must have OCD. How the fuck are his toys still shiny, spotless and new?
edit: And didn't Woody have a shitty stitch job on his arm (performed by Andy) at the end of 2?