wanderingprostheyltite
Member
I wouldn't say 'sorely needed'. You act as if Oculus have been ruining VR with its monopoly or something.
I think competition can be good, but depending on how much this all fragments things, it might also be a bit of a headache, both for consumers and developers.
That's not how I interpreted his post, I think it's a fair point that more players will only put more of a fire under Oculus' asses to provide the best specs and first party content, which is only a good thing for us. I'm still skeptical with all the folks that were ex Valve that were working directly with them on VR only just awhile ago that they wouldn't have some idea of their product roadmap, basically I'm sure Oculus is somewhat aware of what they're planning, and will be very surprised if there is an intent from Valve to try and take the PC marketshare away from them. I'm somewhat skeptical it's even an hmd in fact, and if it is, I wouldn't be surprised if Oculus/FB were the hardware manufacturers. Honestly that's going to make adoption for CV1 a lot easier as Oculus is aware how little people with top of the line rigs needed to run these experiences are out there. I guess what I'm saying is I'd prefer a partnership in the PC/steambox space rather than Valve and Oculus both duking it out, but hey, that might actually be a better thing for content anyways.