• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Venturebeat: Our Cuphead runneth over

Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.

Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.

Oh no! Several minutes you say?!
 
The fact you are equating a plumbing mistake that could lead to hundreds of dollars of damage (if not more) to a guy playing a piece of entertainment badly says more about you than him tbh.

His analogy doesn't even come close to making sense. Where is any amount of logic there?
 
ITT: Everything that is wrong with people's attitudes towards the gaming press.

Everyone's a fucking expert gamer here so people writing about them better be fucking good or else.

Or, you know the people could be trained journalists instead who then focus their journalism skills on the gaming industry?

Going by how dumbed down the gaming media had become, where the actual writing of reviews has become almost irrelevant in the sea of video reviews, it's clear people what people prefer, and that's before we get to confirmation bias.

The Gamergate lite stuff in this thread is tiring. It's actually about how good gaming journalists are at games. No worries if you can actually fucking write or use literary criticism properly. No, if you can't master every game the moment you pick up a controller don't even bother.

When your response to someone merely trying a game out and frankly sucking is to then call out their merits as a journalist or worse, you need some serious growing up to do.
 
Sure is a lot of victim blaming in here...

I didn't know about the gamergater guy until today, what I know about is that this guy has no business being a games journalist.

ITT: Everything that is wrong with people's attitudes towards the gaming press.

Everyone's a fucking expert gamer here so people writing about them better be fucking good or else.

Or, you know the people could be trained journalists instead who then focus their journalism skills on the gaming industry?

Going by how dumbed down the gaming media had become, where the actual writing of reviews has become almost irrelevant in the sea of video reviews, it's clear people what people prefer, and that's before we get to confirmation bias.

The Gamergate lite stuff in this thread is tiring. It's actually about how good gaming journalists are at games. No worries if you can actually fucking write or use literary criticism properly. No, if you can't master every game the moment you pick up a controller don't even bother.

When your response to someone merely trying a game out and frankly sucking is to then call out their merits as a journalist or worse, you need some serious growing up to do.
This isn't about mastering games the moment you pick up the controller. Watch the video. And yes, if someone is failing at the very core concepts of a game with the comprehension level that seems to be that of a 5 year old then yes, I should be able to take into consderation that what he writes about that game is not informative or a useful thing to read in any way.
Not to mention the guy couldn't even get his facts about the devs straight and thought they made Super Meat Boy for some reason. He's shit at being a journalist in general.
 
Yeah, they're making them rich with the lootboxes alright. Not everything to come out of the new gaming boom is a positive as he would like to put it.
 
Honestly, they shouldn't have uploaded the footage. If you do an interview that is completely garbage and goes nowhere, you scrap it. If the gameplay is so horrendous it causes thisnkuch outrage, have some respect and either film it again or scrap it
 
Hmm...

Guy calls himself a professional plumber. Opens pipe under sink without turning water off.

Gets called out and ridiculed for not doing his job properly.

Is guy really professional plumber?

No.

Does he deserve to be ridiculed? Probably not.

But did his mistake go viral? Yes

Should he bitch about his mistake? Probably not.

This is the type of stupid shit that embarasses me. Dude posted the video as a joke. It's very obvious. He doesn't loses professional credibility for openly mocking himself on a game he has no intention of reviewing or even actually giving a "real" opinion on.
 
I see a lot of people here aren't familiar with Takahashi's great researched writings on the gaming industry. People questioning his skills as a journalist (I said journalist not a game reviewer) need to fucking educate themselves.

He wasn't even reviewing this game and didn't even say this game was bad. He fully acknowledged that he was the one that was bad at it.

Damn gamer nerds keep your insecurity in check.
 
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.

Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.

Read the article.

Read the title of the video.

It is VERY clear that he's self-deprecating.

It's coverage of the game but he makes it very clear that he sucks at the game in the article that released with the video.

I think a fair amount of people aren't reading the article and just going off of the video, which isn't cool in this case. Missing a bunch of context warps the message.
 
Yeah, it was daft at how overblown it got - although I suppose not that surprising when professional dipshit IMC got involved.

At the very most, it should've been something to joke about - like Takahashi himself does - and then forget about with maybe the sole exception being if he was the one reviewing it (which he isn't), and even then, it would depend on the criticisms made.
 
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.

Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.

The video's title was something like "my shameful Cuphead demo"
 
Oh please. Is "all the people making fun of me are a bunch of dirty alt-right Trump-voters!" the new deflection de jure?

And I can't describe how sick I am of people blatantly misrepresenting the argument about skill. No one is arguing either of the following:

  1. That game journalists must be experts at games.
  2. That everyone must be at least minimally competent at games.

The claim is that game journalists must be at least minimally competent at games. Your elderly uncle is welcome to be transparently incompetent at video games. Someone who holds himself forth as a professional journalist specializing in game-related coverage is not.

And Antonio Salieri doesn't celebrate mediocrity in Amadeus.
 
ITT: Everything that is wrong with people's attitudes towards the gaming press.

Everyone's a fucking expert gamer here so people writing about them better be fucking good or else.

Or, you know the people could be trained journalists instead who then focus their journalism skills on the gaming industry?

Going by how dumbed down the gaming media had become, where the actual writing of reviews has become almost irrelevant in the sea of video reviews, it's clear people what people prefer, and that's before we get to confirmation bias.

The Gamergate lite stuff in this threat is tiring. It's actually about how good gaming journalists are at games. No worries if you can actually fucking write or use literary criticism properly. No, if you can't master every game the moment you pick up a controller don't even bother.

When your response to someone merely trying a game out and frankly sucking is to then call out their merits as a journalist or worse, you need some serious growing up to do.
This is a great post that's going to get lost in sea of people making fucking dumb analogies.
 
Him being harassed by shitheads like Ant-man obviously sucks. Fuck those pricks. Not going to lie though that, like the polygon DOOM video, it did make me chuckle.

On the wider topic of should gaming journalists be skilled at gaming? I'd argue no and they should primarily be good writers/journalists who write thoughtful articles about games. However, I think people who review games should at least be competent at understanding games and their mechanics if they want to offer a critical evaluation of a game. Unless the review is through the lense of someone who is unskilled at games.

The whole things a shitshow really.

My view on the entire thing. For the review bit: I think you either need to be able to understand game design in the way you mentioned or be skilled at games to a decent degree in order to communicate effectively with most of the review audience.
 
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.

Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.
The video's title is literally

Cuphead Gamescom Demo: Dean's Shameful 26 Minutes Of Gameplay

and the description is
Dean Takahashi of GamesBeat has a moment of shame as he fails to pass a level in Cuphead. I've talked about the reaction to this video in my latest column.
With a direct link to the article.
 
Read the article.

Read the title of the video.

It is VERY clear that he's self-deprecating.

It's coverage of the game but he makes it very clear that he sucks at the game in the article that released with the video.

I think a fair amount of people aren't reading the article and just going off of the video, which isn't cool in this case. Missing a bunch of context warps the message.
I did not know there was even an article at all until a few minutes ago. Not everyone browses the blog, and most people are seeing the video through links to the youtube page, which is how most of this goes usually. I rarely go to the full sites when looking for coverage.
 
The harassment is out of hand, but the journalist should've have some skill if they are to preview/review the game.

It would be a diservice to the game if it get reviewed by someone who gives it a low score before it is too hard for them.
 
Wait, he wasn’t even actually reviewing the game? Fuck all y’all then!

“Oh but he can’t even figure out how to combo, how can we trust him with any reviews of anything forever? How will I make up my own mind!? He should be fired and sent back to journalism school to find a new hobby because clearly she... I mean HE doesn’t pass the test to join OUR club!”

my eyes just rolled out of my head
 
Oh please. Is "all the people making fun of me are a bunch of dirty alt-right Trump-voters!" the new deflection de jure?

And I can't describe how sick I am of people blatantly misrepresenting the argument about skill. No one is arguing either of the following:

  1. That game journalists must be experts at games.
  2. That everyone must be at least minimally competent at games.

The claim is that game journalists must be at least minimally competent at games. Your elderly uncle is welcome to be transparently incompetent at video games. Someone who holds himself forth as a professional journalist specializing in game-related coverage is not.

And Antonio Salieri doesn't celebrate mediocrity in Amadeus.

That makes no sense. So Geoff Keighley needs to be competent at games when he covers the industry?

No. You need to be competent at journalism and how research is done. Not everyone in gaming journalism is reviewing games.
 
I see a lot of people here aren't familiar with Takahashi's great researched writings on the gaming industry. People questioning his skills as a journalist (I said journalist not a game reviewer) need to fucking educate themselves.

He wasn't even reviewing this game and didn't even say this game was bad. He fully acknowledged that he was the one that was bad at it.

Damn gamer nerds keep your insecurity in check.

Wow no need to get agressive.

Dude fails to grasp the most basic of concepts even a 10 year old would understand.

He gave Mass Effect a bad score because he didnt understand he could invest skill points.

His opinion on specific videogames is pretty much invalidated.
 
The harassment is out of hand, but the journalist should've have some skill if they are to preview/review the game.

It would be a diservice to the game if it get reviewed by someone who gives it a low score before it is too hard for them.

You realize that he probably is more representative of the general gaming audience than hardcore NeoGAF gamers are, right?
 
This is such a poor article and even worse explanation. Using morals and unskilled gamers is so low of him.

He's not being criticized for being a bad gamer, he's being criticized for being a video game journalist who posted a video in which he looks like it's the first time he holds a game controller.

To be able to communicate about the game you have to have the minimum skill required to be able to go through that game, I believe.

The shitstorm itself I dont care about, but has a mere spectator of this it feels like Dean it's taking people for fools by trying to hide the real issue here behind another curtain of "gamers are assholes to less skilled gamers".
 
All sides of this seem stupid. The journalist should have been able to follow those VERY simple instructions. That is a strike against him (and it does bring his competency into question). On the other hand, that doesn't really give you the right to harass him.
 
Oh please. Is "all the people making fun of me are a bunch of dirty alt-right Trump-voters!" the new deflection de jure?

And I can't describe how sick I am of people blatantly misrepresenting the argument about skill. No one is arguing either of the following:

  1. That game journalists must be experts at games.
  2. That everyone must be at least minimally competent at games.

The claim is that game journalists must be at least minimally competent at games. Your elderly uncle is welcome to be transparently incompetent at video games. Someone who holds himself forth as a professional journalist specializing in game-related coverage is not.

And Antonio Salieri doesn't celebrate mediocrity in Amadeus.

The guy who broke the story on faulty 360's shouldn't be considered a games journalist because he sucks at Cuphead. Interesting.
 
I think the harassment towards Takahashi is inexcusable and I think that IMC is a walking trash bin. I still think ultimately it was a bad idea to post the video, but that in no way means he deserves the shit he's getting for it. I just don't think it's a good video.

I hope this kind of argument isn't getting misconstrued as victim blaming because I'm doing nothing of the sort.
 
The video's title is literally



and the description is

With a direct link to the article.
Honestly, At first i did not know he was with VentureBeat, and assumed that was another source that was covering his bad gameplay because of tge recent implosion.
 
I didn't know about the gamergater guy until today, what I know about is that this guy has no business being a games journalist.

The guy claims he has been in the industry since the Pong days, has done reviews before.

But because he sucked ONCE means he shouldn't be a journalist?

Really?
 
That makes no sense. So Geoff Keighley needs to be competent at games when he covers the industry?

Minimally competent? Obviously. Would you trust a journalist who specialized in automobiles who has trouble putting a car in reverse or driving with an automatic transmission? Would you trust a film reviewer who doesn't know what "cinematography" is? That is the level of competence we're talking about here.
 
Ok. I understand that some people who write/work in the games industry probably don't have a whole lot of time to play and become competent at videogames, but that doesn't answer why they decided to record him play in the first place.

I don't think it unreasonable to have someone who is showing off a game be somewhat competent at it.
 
Minimally competent? Obviously. Would you trust a journalist who specialized in automobiles who has trouble putting a car in reverse or driving with an automatic transmission? Would you trust a film reviewer who doesn't know what "cinematography" is? That is the level of competence we're talking about here.

Sorry was he reviewing cuphead here? Was what I was responding to about gaming journalist or gaming reviewer?
 
Read the article.

Read the title of the video.

It is VERY clear that he's self-deprecating.

It's coverage of the game but he makes it very clear that he sucks at the game in the article that released with the video.

I think a fair amount of people aren't reading the article and just going off of the video, which isn't cool in this case.

The title of the video was edited after everyone made fun of it for a day or more.
 
I got to this before seeing it on Gaf. Gaf is surprisingly not my only source of info.

But you responded to the thread, again and again, without reading the basis of the thread.

Ok. I understand that some people who write/work in the games industry probably don't have a whole lot of time to play and become competent at videogames, but that doesn't answer why they decided to record him play in the first place.

I don't think it unreasonable to have someone who is showing off a game be somewhat competent at it.

Sigh.
 
Hmm...

Guy calls himself a professional plumber. Opens pipe under sink without turning water off.

Gets called out and ridiculed for not doing his job properly.

Is guy really professional plumber?

No.

Does he deserve to be ridiculed? Probably not.

But did his mistake go viral? Yes

Should he bitch about his mistake? Probably not.
He isnt going to damage any of that source code with his bad gaming skill.
 
Ok. I understand that some people who write/work in the games industry probably don't have a whole lot of time to play and become competent at videogames, but that doesn't answer why they decided to record him play in the first place.

I don't think it unreasonable to have someone who is showing off a game be somewhat competent at it.
Because they needed footage for their channel. Try reading the OP:

Mike Minotti of GamesBeat plays them, and he will likely do the formal review of the game when it comes out on September 29.

But he wasn't at Gamescom in Germany, and I was.
 
I'm mostly failing to see the need to grandstand here.

A video of someone sucking at Cuphead is not worth a thinkpiece. It's something you may chuckle at if you're into 2D action games. It's not some damning evidence that the state of video game writing is trash, nor is it a launching point to claim that genre familiarity is totally meaningless in games criticism.

Regardless of what the Ant Boys do.
 
As someone who enjoys games, but isn't particularly good at them I want more perspectives from "normal" gamers. The whole "you just suck at the game" attitude within gaming circles is tiring.

I also think the beginning cuphead tutorial is poorly designed.
 
Then find someone else to do it.

The footage as is have very little value as is.

It sounds like he was the only person on their team at that convention so that would be pretty hard to pull off.

The guy claims he has been in the industry since the Pong days, has done reviews before.

But because he sucked ONCE means he shouldn't be a journalist?

Really?

No, no, you don't understand; he also messed up once nine years ago and so he should be barred form journalism forever, clearly.
 
You realize that he probably is more representative of the general gaming audience than hardcore NeoGAF gamers are, right?

Totally get it, but it is still a diservice and a bad review if you go ahead and give it a low score because you auck at it.

Unless you were talking about the harassmemt part which is always wrong.
 
Then find someone else to do it.

The footage as it is has very little value.

If you read the piece, you'd know that they did it because they thought everyone would have a good laugh at it, that it would be just some fun thing that people would enjoy and just go on with their lives.
 
Then find someone else to do it.

The footage as it is has very little value.
Try reading the OP:

In fact, platform games like Cuphead are not my specialty. Mike Minotti of GamesBeat plays them, and he will likely do the formal review of the game when it comes out on September 29.

But he wasn't at Gamescom in Germany, and I was.
 
The guy claims he has been in the industry since the Pong days, has done reviews before.

But because he sucked ONCE means he shouldn't be a journalist?

Really?

If his level of understanding seems to be that of a 5 year old then yes, really. It's not about sucking. It's about normally realizing that jumping on an enemy hurts you and attempting to do it 10 times anyway.
If you jump against a pillar for 5 minutes like some imbecile then yes, that guy has no business judging gameplay mechanics as a whole. I have no problem with people being bad at videogames. But if you can't even get the very very basics down then how can you talk about that stuff like you know anything about it?

I would trust someone's food critique if he can't cook on the level of those he critiques no problem. I wouldn't trust someone's food critique if he didn't know how to cook noodles.
 
There's a reason everyone is just pointing to the Mass Effect review that one time where he didn't put points in skills.

The man is a journalist not a reviewer. But yeah let's all keep discrediting his journalism chops based on that one time. You know despite him breaking the the Xbox red ring story amongst loads of other stories and actual books he's written on the industry.
 
But you responded to the thread, again and again, without reading the basis of the thread.



Sigh.
Yeah, and that was my mistake. But thats(not knowing theres an article or that its self deprecation) a mistake pretty much most people are gonna make, because its presented as game coverage more than self deprecation.
 
Top Bottom