GurgleBot20
Member
I don't know much about this guy's work, but obviously people are better at some genres than others?
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.
Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.
The fact you are equating a plumbing mistake that could lead to hundreds of dollars of damage (if not more) to a guy playing a piece of entertainment badly says more about you than him tbh.
Sure is a lot of victim blaming in here...
This isn't about mastering games the moment you pick up the controller. Watch the video. And yes, if someone is failing at the very core concepts of a game with the comprehension level that seems to be that of a 5 year old then yes, I should be able to take into consderation that what he writes about that game is not informative or a useful thing to read in any way.ITT: Everything that is wrong with people's attitudes towards the gaming press.
Everyone's a fucking expert gamer here so people writing about them better be fucking good or else.
Or, you know the people could be trained journalists instead who then focus their journalism skills on the gaming industry?
Going by how dumbed down the gaming media had become, where the actual writing of reviews has become almost irrelevant in the sea of video reviews, it's clear people what people prefer, and that's before we get to confirmation bias.
The Gamergate lite stuff in this thread is tiring. It's actually about how good gaming journalists are at games. No worries if you can actually fucking write or use literary criticism properly. No, if you can't master every game the moment you pick up a controller don't even bother.
When your response to someone merely trying a game out and frankly sucking is to then call out their merits as a journalist or worse, you need some serious growing up to do.
Hmm...
Guy calls himself a professional plumber. Opens pipe under sink without turning water off.
Gets called out and ridiculed for not doing his job properly.
Is guy really professional plumber?
No.
Does he deserve to be ridiculed? Probably not.
But did his mistake go viral? Yes
Should he bitch about his mistake? Probably not.
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.
Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.
Everyone here thinks the hate and harassment is garbage.Lots of people I respect in the industry thought that the hate this guy was getting was absolute garbage, so I'm going to side with them.
Ok, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.
Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.
This is a great post that's going to get lost in sea of people making fucking dumb analogies.ITT: Everything that is wrong with people's attitudes towards the gaming press.
Everyone's a fucking expert gamer here so people writing about them better be fucking good or else.
Or, you know the people could be trained journalists instead who then focus their journalism skills on the gaming industry?
Going by how dumbed down the gaming media had become, where the actual writing of reviews has become almost irrelevant in the sea of video reviews, it's clear people what people prefer, and that's before we get to confirmation bias.
The Gamergate lite stuff in this threat is tiring. It's actually about how good gaming journalists are at games. No worries if you can actually fucking write or use literary criticism properly. No, if you can't master every game the moment you pick up a controller don't even bother.
When your response to someone merely trying a game out and frankly sucking is to then call out their merits as a journalist or worse, you need some serious growing up to do.
Him being harassed by shitheads like Ant-man obviously sucks. Fuck those pricks. Not going to lie though that, like the polygon DOOM video, it did make me chuckle.
On the wider topic of should gaming journalists be skilled at gaming? I'd argue no and they should primarily be good writers/journalists who write thoughtful articles about games. However, I think people who review games should at least be competent at understanding games and their mechanics if they want to offer a critical evaluation of a game. Unless the review is through the lense of someone who is unskilled at games.
The whole things a shitshow really.
The video's title is literallyOk, ill take the L on that, I only knew of that from twitter without a full quote. My mistake there.
Still, the video was put out as coverage, and is not clear that its self deprecation or anything. Every place i saw the video jyst advertised it as a demo with gameplay, and it took him several minutes to get passed the tutorial.
Cuphead Gamescom Demo: Dean's Shameful 26 Minutes Of Gameplay
With a direct link to the article.Dean Takahashi of GamesBeat has a moment of shame as he fails to pass a level in Cuphead. I've talked about the reaction to this video in my latest column.
I did not know there was even an article at all until a few minutes ago. Not everyone browses the blog, and most people are seeing the video through links to the youtube page, which is how most of this goes usually. I rarely go to the full sites when looking for coverage.Read the article.
Read the title of the video.
It is VERY clear that he's self-deprecating.
It's coverage of the game but he makes it very clear that he sucks at the game in the article that released with the video.
I think a fair amount of people aren't reading the article and just going off of the video, which isn't cool in this case. Missing a bunch of context warps the message.
Oh please. Is "all the people making fun of me are a bunch of dirty alt-right Trump-voters!" the new deflection de jure?
And I can't describe how sick I am of people blatantly misrepresenting the argument about skill. No one is arguing either of the following:
- That game journalists must be experts at games.
- That everyone must be at least minimally competent at games.
The claim is that game journalists must be at least minimally competent at games. Your elderly uncle is welcome to be transparently incompetent at video games. Someone who holds himself forth as a professional journalist specializing in game-related coverage is not.
And Antonio Salieri doesn't celebrate mediocrity in Amadeus.
I did not know there was even an article at all until a few minutes ago.
I see a lot of people here aren't familiar with Takahashi's great researched writings on the gaming industry. People questioning his skills as a journalist (I said journalist not a game reviewer) need to fucking educate themselves.
He wasn't even reviewing this game and didn't even say this game was bad. He fully acknowledged that he was the one that was bad at it.
Damn gamer nerds keep your insecurity in check.
The harassment is out of hand, but the journalist should've have some skill if they are to preview/review the game.
It would be a diservice to the game if it get reviewed by someone who gives it a low score before it is too hard for them.
Oh please. Is "all the people making fun of me are a bunch of dirty alt-right Trump-voters!" the new deflection de jure?
And I can't describe how sick I am of people blatantly misrepresenting the argument about skill. No one is arguing either of the following:
- That game journalists must be experts at games.
- That everyone must be at least minimally competent at games.
The claim is that game journalists must be at least minimally competent at games. Your elderly uncle is welcome to be transparently incompetent at video games. Someone who holds himself forth as a professional journalist specializing in game-related coverage is not.
And Antonio Salieri doesn't celebrate mediocrity in Amadeus.
Honestly, At first i did not know he was with VentureBeat, and assumed that was another source that was covering his bad gameplay because of tge recent implosion.The video's title is literally
and the description is
With a direct link to the article.
I didn't know about the gamergater guy until today, what I know about is that this guy has no business being a games journalist.
That makes no sense. So Geoff Keighley needs to be competent at games when he covers the industry?
Minimally competent? Obviously. Would you trust a journalist who specialized in automobiles who has trouble putting a car in reverse or driving with an automatic transmission? Would you trust a film reviewer who doesn't know what "cinematography" is? That is the level of competence we're talking about here.
Read the article.
Read the title of the video.
It is VERY clear that he's self-deprecating.
It's coverage of the game but he makes it very clear that he sucks at the game in the article that released with the video.
I think a fair amount of people aren't reading the article and just going off of the video, which isn't cool in this case.
I got to this before seeing it on Gaf. Gaf is surprisingly not my only source of info.It's the OP.
I got to this before seeing it on Gaf. Gaf is surprisingly not my only source of info.
Ok. I understand that some people who write/work in the games industry probably don't have a whole lot of time to play and become competent at videogames, but that doesn't answer why they decided to record him play in the first place.
I don't think it unreasonable to have someone who is showing off a game be somewhat competent at it.
He isnt going to damage any of that source code with his bad gaming skill.Hmm...
Guy calls himself a professional plumber. Opens pipe under sink without turning water off.
Gets called out and ridiculed for not doing his job properly.
Is guy really professional plumber?
No.
Does he deserve to be ridiculed? Probably not.
But did his mistake go viral? Yes
Should he bitch about his mistake? Probably not.
Because they needed footage for their channel. Try reading the OP:Ok. I understand that some people who write/work in the games industry probably don't have a whole lot of time to play and become competent at videogames, but that doesn't answer why they decided to record him play in the first place.
I don't think it unreasonable to have someone who is showing off a game be somewhat competent at it.
Mike Minotti of GamesBeat plays them, and he will likely do the formal review of the game when it comes out on September 29.
But he wasn't at Gamescom in Germany, and I was.
Because they needed footage for their channel.
Then find someone else to do it.
The footage as is have very little value as is.
The guy claims he has been in the industry since the Pong days, has done reviews before.
But because he sucked ONCE means he shouldn't be a journalist?
Really?
You realize that he probably is more representative of the general gaming audience than hardcore NeoGAF gamers are, right?
Then find someone else to do it.
The footage as is have very little value as is.
Then find someone else to do it.
The footage as it is has very little value.
Try reading the OP:Then find someone else to do it.
The footage as it is has very little value.
In fact, platform games like Cuphead are not my specialty. Mike Minotti of GamesBeat plays them, and he will likely do the formal review of the game when it comes out on September 29.
But he wasn't at Gamescom in Germany, and I was.
The guy claims he has been in the industry since the Pong days, has done reviews before.
But because he sucked ONCE means he shouldn't be a journalist?
Really?
Yeah, and that was my mistake. But thats(not knowing theres an article or that its self deprecation) a mistake pretty much most people are gonna make, because its presented as game coverage more than self deprecation.But you responded to the thread, again and again, without reading the basis of the thread.
Sigh.