CartridgeBlower
Member
Why is Verge in the thread title if this was CBS story?
Why is Verge in the thread title if this was CBS story?
To be fair to Balmer, Apple and Google are MUCH more competent competitors than the companies Gates vanquished.While Microsoft may never have been first, the difference between CEO's is that Gates knew how to enter a market, even late, and take it over. Well, usually. Ballmer does not know how to do that.
He entered browsers late. Netscape ruled the game. And... look what happened there.
He entered spreadsheets late, when Lotus ruled. Now... I can't even imagine using anything other than Excel.
He destroyed Borland in development systems.
If he was still CEO, Sony would be out of the console market.
Besides the Xbox 360, has Microsoft produced anything in the Ballmer era (that wasn't a layover from Gates) that has truly dominated?
Anything at all?
Besides the Xbox 360, has Microsoft produced anything in the Ballmer era (that wasn't a layover from Gates) that has truly dominated?
Anything at all?
Since when? Windows Phone has issues with mindshare, not ease of use. And even then it's growing at a very fast rate YoY when you look at web usage stats.
It ended 2012 6th in installed base behind android, ios, blackberry, Symbian and bada.
In Q4 2012 it sold less than blackberry, ending 4th for the quarter.
I'd say its pretty boned.
(MS Employee on Phone, disclosure).
This is surprising to me. Nearly everyone I know that has used Windows phone, or that I've showed the OS to has adopted very quickly to the environment. My interpretation lays more within the camp that most people haven't even heard of the OS, though I think that is changing.
He's probably referring to this and the implied trend:
Windows 8 is key to the future, the Surface computer. Bing, people are seeing as a better search product, Xbox."
Microsoft was and is hardly a company which brought innovative ideas into consumer products. They were and are always successful in using existing ideas and extending upon them
quaere said:To be fair to Balmer, Apple and Google are MUCH more competent competitors than the companies Gates vanquished.
The original implementation seems pretty primitive compared to NeXTSTEP object stuff, which came prior. Depends on which part you're referring to though.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Linking_and_Embedding
As someone who grew up using a command line this one blew my mind in Windows 3.1 and still continues to blow my mind when I really stop and think about it.
But by then will it be too late? Windows Phone is going no where at the moment and no one seems to want a Windows 8 tablet either.
Congrats on being the last person in the universe to note that Windows Mobile went in the wrong direction, Bill.
You're all kinds of clueless.
The reality is MS is the company that's the closest to that one convergent device future while Apple claims there shouldn't be convergence and Google doesn't look like its trying to converge Chrome OS and Android. With Haswell and Broadwell, MS can get there.
If MS gets this right, they can continue their dominance in the industry.
The original implementation seems pretty primitive compared to NeXTSTEP object stuff, which came prior. Depends on which part you're referring to though.
I'm referring to the analytics data on my own website which show it's already beaten BB, at least among that demographic.He's probably referring to this and the implied trend:
Windows Mobile was good.
And 6.5 was the messy Android stuff you guys love anyway.
It was fine.
Since when? Windows Phone has issues with mindshare, not ease of use. And even then it's growing at a very fast rate YoY when you look at web usage stats.
Doesn't Windows Phone report itself as IE10 just like the desktop/tablet version?