Krappadizzle
Member
Then you'll be annoyed that all the cutscenes are at 30 fps like I am with the PC release. Worth it though.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
VG Tech: Battlefield 1 Xbox One Frame Rate Test (Pre-Release)
- Thread starter Nachtfalke
- Start date
Then you'll be annoyed that all the cutscenes are at 30 fps like I am with the PC release. Worth it though.
It's playable. It just gets a little chunky during something like a mass rush in a 64 player Operation match.
Summer Haze
Banned
Hasn't been the case for every previous BF this gen, and Battlefront I believe (?).
If the performance on PS4 is similar to the beta then I'm good.
PackAPunchedMick
Member
We're talking 1-5 frames better.
The game will still feel sluggish when the shit hits the fan.
BigEmil
Junior Member
Never heard this, source?
It is far from playable. When the fps changes all the time it makes aiming etc very difficult.
Far from playable? What? I've played for ~8 hours and it's been a ton of fun. Are there noticeable drop? Absolutely but it hasn't taken away from how fun Operations are.
The hyperbole is here. Far from playable...lol
Hyperbole? I love my Xbox One and have played this extensively but the poor FPS made Conquest etc extremely difficult to enjoy.
Glad you had fun with it and I respect your opinion.
LelouchZero
Member
Wow the multiplayer frame-rate is terrible, it seems that the game is having a nice feast on the CPU, or maybe the performance problems are from somewhere else? I guess we'll find out when the PS4 and PS4 Pro versions are tested.
Don't oversell it, it's minor. But I'm eager to see how this will go for games with dynamic resolution.
Yes it could easily.
If the framerate drops are due to the CPU, then increased resolution won't have an impact.
Since this is large modes in BF, I'm sure CPU is the main culprit. The small modes in BF4 ran really well. I expect that to be the same here.
Not with the same cpu. You'll see a slight bump, but there will still be a lot of drops, just at a higher resplution
GinoFelino
Member
Complicated
Banned
Nah. It's been fine for the 10 hours I've played.
1080p users on Pro should get a 1080p 60fps.
EASTC0AST_GH05T
Member
That's all im hoping for.
I think it'll probably still drop to the low 50s under load due to the CPU. Should hold 60 for much longer stretches though.
LukasTaves
Member
If the game has unlocked framerate and dynamic res then I would think so, should have little to no drop specially if the CPU is indeed better than jaguar.
Nachtfalke
Member
OdysseusVA
Banned
Ha that's great
Backfoggen
Banned
I noticed that yesterday and thought I was imagining things. Totally looked like a super low-res image for a split second.
Nachtfalke
Member
I wouldn't expect much in terms of PS4 Pro performance due the same CPU. Can't see how Conquest will run solid there.
Backfoggen
Banned
The CPU is still running at a way higher clock than the base PS4.
nealwinter
Member
I'm very impressed with the visuals of this game. The framerate stays fairly smooth even in multiplayer.
Nachtfalke
Member
Sure, but is that enough? Somehow I doubt that. But let's see how it goes.
Proelite
Member
I noticed that yesterday and thought I was imagining things. Totally looked like a super low-res image for a split second.
Bf1 coming to the iWatch!
I want to play a whole game in that res.
does GPGPU not exist anymore or something?
edit: after seeing the PS4 framerate test.....I'm not even sure if some dev's are offloading CPU tasks to the GPU. Maybe most multiplatform games don't even use it? Possibly not enough time to optimize fully?
Yeah but it's not a massive difference so while it'll be better than the base PS4, it won't be close to be over 2 times better or anything like that.
Polishing a turd, in a way.
I noticed that yesterday and thought I was imagining things. Totally looked like a super low-res image for a split second.
What is this 320P . Yikes!!
This is photoshoped ,Right?
Caayn
Member
I thought that by now people would know that GPGPU isn't a magic method in which you can throw everything and it'll work.
LukasTaves
Member
24% higher. If the bad framerate in this game is completely due the CPU then it won't get you to a locked 60 still.
But if the gpu also plays a part (the game uses dynamic res so it's a safe bet), it might be possible to have this game near locked at 1080p60 on pro.
yeah i will save my money, BF4 was bad enough already.
I know its not magic......but offloading CPU tasks to the GPU would help a ton. Does this game look infinitely better than Battlefront? Probably could have pulled a locked 60 if they just stuck it to 900p. It's obvious they aren't using it because RAW power seems to be the winner here for FPS in the CPU, while the GPU in the PS4 could easily have been used for some offloaded tasks to help with the framerate a lot.
GPGPU isn't some magic bullet that fixes all these issues. If all tasks could be offloaded to a gpu, there wouldn't be cpus in these systems
Depends on if the issues are CPU or GPU related.
LukasTaves
Member
Game drops to below 720p already, likely making it stuck to 900p would have much worse performance.
I mean 1100x620 being a resolution that the PS4 hits at all is a joke.....thats almost 360 era resolution days and with the FPS from that conquest fitting floating in between what seems to be 40-50fps most of the time with serious drops when looking at a lot of buildings means I'll pass on this and wait for what the Pro tests bring. That's a huge fluctuation it FPS that makes in unbearable to play.
Does the game have a 30 fps lock?
Does the game have a 30 fps lock?
LukasTaves
Member
I think you are comparing Xb1 campaign footage to conquest Ps4. There's also conquest footage of the xbone version that doesn't look any better.
Still, the game looks and feels way way way better than bf4 did at launch on xbone, so if you had a good time playing that it's only going to be better in this game.