Bits N Pieces
Member
Like the Leveson inquiry?
So its a delayed game then?
The comparison was to the actual peanut salmonella case that just broke the news. Also, people need to realize comparisons don't need to be 100% identical to be valid. Someone is about to sell stuff in bad faith, period.
Thats not what his statement is referring to at all
Both started by an "off-hand comment" that, if not run by every other major media outlet, probably would have started and ended in a podcast, with no harm done.In one case someone broke the legal agreement they made with their employer. In the other...nothing at all really happened.
This thread is so incredibly NeoGAF, I almost can't believe it.
Serius Journalizm! Broken Games! Assassin's Creed! Teh Ethicz!
It's like a dream come true.
You're really reaching there as confirmation that all of out the games mentioned, (especially when multiple people in this thread have said otherwise), that the game is broken."It does have to be good, doesn't it? Let's hope that it's good."
"They can't have two shit ones"
"No, they can't. Let's hope that it works..."
"It does have to be good, doesn't it? Let's hope that it's good."
"They can't have two shit ones"
"No, they can't. Let's hope that it works..."
"It does have to be good, doesn't it? Let's hope that it's good."
"They can't have two shit ones"
"No, they can't. Let's hope that it works..."
Both started by an "off-hand comment" that, if not run by every other major media outlet, probably would have started and ended in a podcast, with no harm done.
All this has done is shake people's confidence in pretty much every major game releasing this holiday. This is a huge issue in the industry right now (releasing broken games). Using terrible, vague-but-just-barely-not-NDA-breaking language to fan the flames just feels bad.
Please be AC so it becomes the final nail in the coffin for the franchise
C'mon it can't be AC. Ubisoft can't be stupid enough to pull the same fiasco they did with Unity's release!
I'm amazed that people in this thread are legitimately upset over a company not breaking the law.
You're really reaching there as confirmation that all of out the games mentioned, (especially when multiple people in this thread have said otherwise), that the game is broken.
And that's confirming AC is broke ? lol.
What the fuck guys, calm down. I think it is genreal consense that this AC has to be good and they're just saying that.
How does that in any way hint that assassins creed is broken on a technical level
I know it's easy to blame publishers for the amount of broken games we see but perhaps if we had a games media with journalists willing to say "Assassin's Creed: Syndicate seems like it will be broken at launch" instead of being coy and making maybe/maybe not statements we would have a more consumer-facing industry as a whole.
It's all in the word "can't" man. That basically confirmed it. Ignore all the impressions from people in the thread who played it quite recently. Ignore this unedited stream of gameplay from two different PS4s that shows off what we'll likely get in the final release, (pop-in, occasional clipping, etc).How does that in any way hint that assassins creed is broken on a technical level
Has the Bombcast or Beastcast hinted towards any game being majorly broken?
He is right though, imagine the VW scandal but the journalists would say "well the emissions of cars from one company are higher than they said but we wont say which company"
why shouldnt we hold the same standard of journalism to all areas?
I think people are upset, or at least I am, that they bent the law to the breaking point, and then stopped. Don't bend or break the law. If you're under NDA, don't talk about the game you're under NDA for.
Plenty of people in plenty of industries do this every day. Then when the NDA is up, they talk about it. Just shouldn't have said anything at all. Now you're shaking consumer confidence in EVERY game that releases this holiday season, and that's not fair to the dev teams that put out a good product on launch.
Except that new peanut butter brands don't get reviewed by hundreds of different outlets who are there to tell us if the game is worthwhile and warn us if the game is broken. And buying a shit game doesn't endanger your health. And none of us should be pre-ordering anyway after last year's fiasco; so if you get a game on day one and it's broken, it's your own fault for not waiting for reviews and YouTubers to spread the word.
This is what you do to yourself you fools:
![]()
If it's Assassins Creed, would that surprise anyone? AC:Unity launched as a buggy mess with lousy gameplay and horrendous issues on PC. If I were a betting man, I would bet that the next AC will be similarly buggy on launch, horrendous issues on PC, and likely have the same gameplay that has stunted the series for 5+ years.
This is what you do to yourself you fools:
![]()
With your own logic, can't be Battlefront either then after BF4, particularly with such a big franchise and no campaign to speak of.I'm betting on Star Wars. Damn, I was looking forward to it. Well, I can get it next year then.
I doubt it's Assass, because Ubi made that mistake and even they can't be that stupid, right?
"I hope millions of fans get a shitty game so that this thing I don't like yet am too childish to ignore can go away. "
It's not like he didn't know this already. Or at least, he should have.
What is this supposed to mean?
Why does everything have to be coy?
This is what you do to yourself you fools:
![]()
C'mon it can't be AC. Ubisoft can't be stupid enough to pull the same fiasco they did with Unity's release!
Nov. 19thHasn't AC: S been delayed on PC?
Unless EA and Dice release an alpha build I don't see how that one gaffer's(who evidently doesn't know understand how serious NDAs are and is likely in trouble), comments hold any weight either yet that got an article.With your own logic, can't be Battlefront either then after BF4, particularly with such a big franchise and no campaign to speak of.
At least I hope not.
I wouldn't attempt to make any judgment about why anything was done unless I did it. I'm just telling you what it WILL do, and clearly has done. The flames have been fanned, and people are more upset about games that haven't even launched yet, being broken at launch, offhand comment or not.It was done to "fan the flames"? Not, because, you know, they were having a conversation and made an off hand comment related to the topic?
In no way is this the same as the Chris Pranger situation.
It's not like he didn't know this already. Or at least, he should have.