Flightmare
Member
Reading the plot, sounds exactly like the same events on the GC version. There's nothing wrong with re-makes. But calling it a sequel is like calling REmake a sequel.
Same cover for the most part.
What the fuck?
Reading the plot, sounds exactly like the same events on the GC version. There's nothing wrong with re-makes. But calling it a sequel is like calling REmake a sequel.
Same cover for the most part.
Not having the exact same game on other console and I don't mean "it's not the same game it's not the same content"
First sentence on Wikipedia:Just by going off wiki. Everyone here says its not, so I must be mistaken. But reading the plot on there, it looks like a re-make.
Sorry all. Didn't mean to offend. LM must indeed be a sequel.
Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon, known in Japan as Luigi Mansion 2 (ルイージマンション2 Ruīji Manshon Tsū, and in Europe and Australia as Luigi's Mansion 2, is an action-adventure video game developed by Next Level Games and published by Nintendo for the Nintendo 3DS, and is the sequel to the 2001 game Luigi's Mansion for the Nintendo GameCube.
Different characters, plot, and environments. LM has the SAME story with more things added to it. Thus, a re-make.
There's nothing wrong with re-makes. If I offended people, I'm sorry. I just read the plot synopsis on wiki, and compared it to the original. They're just making the original game better.
itsallgoodbaby.gif
This exact sentence seems like double talk to me. You're living up to your avatar.
So which is it? Is it a port when:
The game exists with no enhancements over the original
OR WHEN
The game purely exists on another platform literally
Just by going off wiki. Everyone here says its not, so I must be mistaken. But reading the plot on there, it looks like a re-make.
Sorry all. Didn't mean to offend. LM must indeed be a sequel.
read the plot and compare it to the original. You can see why I thought it was redone. Besides, I already admitted defeat.First sentence on Wikipedia:
This exact sentence seems like double talk to me. You're living up to your avatar.
So which is it? Is it a port when:
The game exists with no enhancements over the original
OR WHEN
The game purely exists on another platform literally
The Wikipedia article doesn't mention it (at least in a clear fashion), but timeline-wise, LM2's events occur after the first game.read the plot and compare it to the original. You can see why I thought it was redone. Besides, I already admitted defeat.
itsallgood.
Just by going off wiki. Everyone here says its not, so I must be mistaken. But reading the plot on there, it looks like a re-make.
Sorry all. Didn't mean to offend. LM must indeed be a sequel.
A port is when it's a game is ported onto another console there's nothing complicated about this. Even enhanced ports are still ports. That's all there is to it.
It is all good. Bringing out dictionary definitions isn't a nice way to carry a conversation. You should chillax, my argument was flawed. I was corrected, the end. You don't have to resort to antics to get your point accross.Sequel; A published, broadcast, or recorded work that continues the story or develops the theme of an earlier one.
Something that takes place after or as a result of an earlier event.
You don't get to change the dictionary. It is not all good, baby.
It is all good. Bringing out dictionary definitions isn't a nice way to carry a conversation. You should chillax, my argument was flawed. I was corrected, the end. You don't have to resort to antics to get your point accross.
I sure am! You sure told me. I listed the game as a remake because I read the plot from wikipedia and it reads the same as the original. I made a mistake. I admitted it was a mistake. It's over.you're being purposely obtuse. Uncharted 2 has the same plot as Uncarted 1. REMAKE!
Your definition of remake smells regardless of whether it's untrue in this specific instance.
Now everyone kiss.
It's not the same game. It's not the same content.Lets add some more sizzle to this debate.
Should ports of PS3 games even be considered ports since the ps4 isn't backwards compatible and we all are throwing our PS3s in the trash in a few months?
Much like the Wii U, I'm waiting for a Vita price drop and at least one other game I care about besides Gravity Rush.
As a future Vita owner, I have zero interest in Soul Sacrifice.No interest in Soul Sacrifice, eh?
Lets add some more sizzle to this debate.
Should ports of PS3 games even be considered ports since the ps4 isn't backwards compatible and we all are throwing our PS3s in the trash in a few months?
If Sony decided to bring Uncharted 2 to the Vita, I don't care what you call it. It could be an exact duplicate with no extra content and I'd still buy.
I was going to post a response, but I realized some people might on the last page. Again, I was mistaken.Dumbest thing I've read this year.
I just think Sony needs to actually show us they still care.
Sorry, everybody. No more problems from this guy! Mwah!
I wonder if Sega fans were like this near the end.
As a future Vita owner, I have zero interest in Soul Sacrifice.
I remember hearing how Sega was getting out of the hardware business at Saturn's launch. Those folks were sharp as tacks and 100% accurate. Only relating the "cold reality" of the situation they wanted to see.I wonder if Sega fans were like this near the end.
Lets add some more sizzle to this debate.
Should ports of PS3 games even be considered ports since the ps4 isn't backwards compatible and we all are throwing our PS3s in the trash in a few months?
I love the HD collections, remakes, PSP and PSOne games, but I do want new games that are made for Vita specifically. Compered to 3DS's list for 2013, Vita is lacking.
Hey guys am I doing it right???
![]()
Vita has no games.
Nope. I actually only have SF4 and I got that for $10 at BB. Plus i didnt buy a 3DS for SF4. Don't have any of the other games yet, but vita doesn't have enhanced remakes, it has ports...You didn't happen to by Zelda:OoT, Starfox, or Luigi's Mansion did you? Because if you did, your standards can't be that high seeing as how ALL those would be considered ports.
edit: or any of the 3DS fighting games.
I think you should stop and educate your ignorance. Read up on a review and stop making yourself sound stupid...Different characters, plot, and environments. LM has the SAME story with more things added to it. Thus, a re-make.
There's nothing wrong with re-makes. If I offended people, I'm sorry. I just read the plot synopsis on wiki, and compared it to the original. They're just making the original game better.
itsallgoodbaby.gif
I wonder if Sega fans were like this near the end.
A port is when it's a game is ported onto another console there's nothing complicated about this. Even enhanced ports are still ports. That's all there is to it.
Wait wait wait wait.
Vita has folders now???
Shit. Oh well, 3DS had a good run.
I thought Assassin's Creed on the Vita had high sales because it was bundled with the system? Or was that something else?Going through this thread, I have realised one thing again. Allright two, besides every time true fact that we are defending companies.
Vita folks love to bring up those worldwide Assasins Creed sale numbers. But 3DS folks almost never bring up those third party titles which completely outsold AC. How so? Just curious, I dare you starting sales list-wars.
Going through this thread, I have realised one thing again. Allright two, besides every time true fact that we are defending companies.
Vita folks love to bring up those worldwide Assasins Creed sale numbers. But 3DS folks almost never bring up those third party titles which completely outsold AC. How so? Just curious, I dare you starting sales list-wars.
Going through this thread, I have realised one thing again. Allright two, besides every time true fact that we are defending companies.
Vita folks love to bring up those worldwide Assasins Creed sale numbers. But 3DS folks almost never bring up those third party titles which completely outsold AC. How so? Just curious, I dare you starting sales list-wars.