• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Vox: Why cartoon characters wear gloves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really good. Always wondered that.

For people who don't wanna watch the video:
Many antropomorphic cartoon characters in the early days of animation were drawn completely black (like Felix the Cat, Mickey Mouse, etc.). You couldn't see black hands (or feet) on a black body (or any kind of black background) very well. So at one point they added gloves, which was also a reference to old Vaudeville shows. When Vaudeville shows started to dissapear, gloves on cartoon characters stayed because people basically expected them on cartoon characters.
That's why characters like Goofy, Mickey Mouse or Bugs Bunny look...honestly kinda weird whitout their gloves on.
Also gloves saved time animating.

Then at the end it asks the question: Why does Daffy Duck wear this collar-thing around his neck?

Really nice, very informative, pretty cool.
 
Really good. Always wondered that.

For people who don't wanna watch the video:
Many antropomorphic cartoon characters in the early days of animation were drawn completely black (like Felix the Cat, Mickey Mouse, etc.). You couldn't see black hands (or feet) on a black body (or any kind of black background) very well. So at one point they added gloves, which was also a reference to old Vaudeville shows. When Vaudeville shows started to dissapear, gloves on cartoon characters stayed because people basically expected them on cartoon characters.
That's why characters like Goofy, Mickey Mouse or Bugs Bunny look...honestly kinda weird whitout their gloves on.
Also gloves saved time animating.

Then at the end it asks the question: Why does Daffy Duck wear this collar-thing around his neck?

Really nice, very informative, pretty cool.

Can't look at the video now but some say the idea came from the ...actual white gloves animators used to don't smudge the ink when rubbing the hand for support

S52QsiM.png

ySsXfWT.jpg
 
Really good. Always wondered that.

For people who don't wanna watch the video:
Many antropomorphic cartoon characters in the early days of animation were drawn completely black (like Felix the Cat, Mickey Mouse, etc.). You couldn't see black hands (or feet) on a black body (or any kind of black background) very well. So at one point they added gloves, which was also a reference to old Vaudeville shows. When Vaudeville shows started to dissapear, gloves on cartoon characters stayed because people basically expected them on cartoon characters.
That's why characters like Goofy, Mickey Mouse or Bugs Bunny look...honestly kinda weird whitout their gloves on.
Also gloves saved time animating.

Then at the end it asks the question: Why does Daffy Duck wear this collar-thing around his neck?

Really nice, very informative, pretty cool.

You failed to mention the whole Blackface minstrel shows being the key inspiration.
 
Is that the same lady 50 years later?

If she is, she's ambidextrous and a good artist.

Saw the video earlier, I always had an inkling about animations link to Minstrels, but haf no clue it was a practical choice too, until that clip with Pete was played where his hand disappeared as it crossed his body.
 
A lot of it was to save ink as well
Thankfully ink costs nothing, even back then.


Jeez, John Canemaker sounds so old in the video, but hopefully it's just the call quality.

I always thought that bird characters tended to not have gloves as a stylistic choice, because their arms are meant to be extensions of their wings, and fingers sometimes very very vaguely representative of feathers. Putting a glove on the end would taper that wing concept down to a single point. Also, none of it matters, since it's a cartoon.

For Daddy's collar though, I always thought it was just an abstraction of the marking on a mallard.

web_6936151152_9c3c5365fb_o.jpg


Something to make his design stand out from when he was just a black and white abstraction.
 
Ties and bows like Fred Flintstone and Yoghi bear like to use. Good stuff.

This one is actually a bit different. All the 30's/40's stuff like Looney Toons, Tom & Jerry, and Disney's theatrical shorts had a huge Hollywood budget. So they had big armies of animators who would redraw every frame, which is why everything looked so fluid and kinetic:

tom-and-jerry-and-butch.gif


giphy.gif


But later, once TV came along, the budgets got way smaller and more output on a shorter time frame was needed. Joe Hanna and William Barbera were among the first to really figure out some good tricks to solve the problem. If you notice every single character here has something around their neck:

7e680422b1f42424af8c3a27b659a299.jpg


Designing them this way made it easy to animate shots where the only the head needs to be animated and they could just draw the body once. It's also why most of them have a "muzzle" of some kind... so the mouth could just move in some cases without drawing the rest of the head. It's also why all those characters have that signature Hanna Barbera walk where the body stays stiff and the arms don't move, only the legs.

Or sometimes they'd draw the head once and animate the body in limited ways.

BARBECUE%2BRIDE.gif


FIBBER%2BYAKKY%2BINFINITY%2BRUN.gif


TAIL%2BWAG%2BSNAG%2BRUN.gif




Interesting stuff.
 
Scarfs/ascots/turtlenecks are also very useful at saving time. Anything that splits body parts helps.

Ties and bows like Fred Flintstone and Yoghi bear like to use. Good stuff.

Wait, I thought the point of those was so that they could mix and match body and head? So if, for instance, you need Fred walking and talking you can have the stock walking body anim and lip-synched facial anims separately?

But that's not what the gloves are for. They weren't animating hands separately from bodies. Even when a character is doing something hand-intensive like playing a piano they're still being very animated with their arms and whatnot.
 
They use tricks like this to this day. If you ever watch Spongebob a lot of times you'll notice that the only things that are moving are his mouth, eyes, and arms, his square body remains static.
 
What's mario's excuse though

h1oCcQC.jpg

I imagine both Bugs Bunny and Mario were designed with gloves simply because cartoon characters have gloves so they've gotta have gloves too.
:P

I mean, the first ever bugs bunny short didn't even have 'em in gloves:
HareHuntlimpGun002-749190.jpg

...despite it being black and white. You'd think it would be there for clarity's sake as usual, but nope.


Edit: Actually my bad. Early Mario was given gloves for the sake of bringing clarity to the rough 8-bit animation.
 
This one is actually a bit different. All the 30's/40's stuff like Looney Toons, Tom & Jerry, and Disney's theatrical shorts had a huge Hollywood budget. So they had big armies of animators who would redraw every frame, which is why everything looked so fluid and kinetic:

tom-and-jerry-and-butch.gif


giphy.gif


But later, once TV came along, the budgets got way smaller and more output on a shorter time frame was needed. Joe Hanna and William Barbera were among the first to really figure out some good tricks to solve the problem. If you notice every single character here has something around their neck:

7e680422b1f42424af8c3a27b659a299.jpg


Designing them this way made it easy to animate shots where the only the head needs to be animated and they could just draw the body once. It's also why most of them have a "muzzle" of some kind... so the mouth could just move in some cases without drawing the rest of the head. It's also why all those characters have that signature Hanna Barbera walk where the body stays stiff and the arms don't move, only the legs.

Or sometimes they'd draw the head once and animate the body in limited ways.

BARBECUE%2BRIDE.gif


FIBBER%2BYAKKY%2BINFINITY%2BRUN.gif


TAIL%2BWAG%2BSNAG%2BRUN.gif




Interesting stuff.

Mind blown, thanks!
 
I imagine both Bugs Bunny and Mario were designed with gloves simply because cartoon characters have gloves so they've gotta have gloves too.
:P

I mean, the first ever bugs bunny short didn't even have 'em in gloves:
HareHuntlimpGun002-749190.jpg

...despite it being black and white. You'd think it would be there for clarity's sake as usual, but nope.


Edit: Actually my bad. Early Mario was given gloves for the sake of bringing clarity to the rough 8-bit animation.
That's not Bugs Bunny, it's a separate character that predates Bugs' official debut by two years. Many traits from from this rabbit character were later transferred to Bugs, but at the same time there's traits that are uncharacteristic of Bugs. Also the rabbit doesn't have Bugs' voice, it's more in line with Woody Woodpecker.
So basically Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny are Black?
Mickey yeah probably, but in Bugs' case I think by the time of his creation it had already become a cartoon cliche of sorts to wear gloves, so he was made to wear gloves. Bugs first appeared in 1940, 12 years after Mickey's official debut and 11 years after Mickey first wore gloves.
 
What's mario's excuse though

h1oCcQC.jpg

Same reason, he's wearing gloves from Super Mario World onwards. Even his NES sprites take care to delineate where his hands are at all time so his run cycle reads properly to the eye.

LoxeuJF.jpg


So yeah, Sonic, Mario and Crash Bandicoot all have their hands contrast with the rest of their bodies for exactly the same reason animators put gloves on their cartoon characters.
 
Mickey yeah probably, but in Bugs' case I think by the time of his creation it had already become a cartoon cliche of sorts to wear gloves, so he was made to wear gloves. Bugs first appeared in 1940, 12 years after Mickey's official debut and 11 years after Mickey first wore gloves.

Nah, Mickey's origin is a literal blackface minstrel depicted as a mouse. So technically he's white wearing blackface makeup and mouse ears and acting "black".
 
That's not Bugs Bunny, it's a separate character that predates Bugs' official debut by two years. Many traits from from this rabbit character were later transferred to Bugs, but at the same time there's traits that are uncharacteristic of Bugs. Also the rabbit doesn't have Bugs' voice, it's more in line with Woody Woodpecker.

I understand that the character is not technically "Bugs Bunny", but he's basically Bug's Australopithecus. It has been stated that the character eventually became bugs bunny multiple times.

Ultimately the point of my post was that Bugs didn't really need gloves at that point in animation history from a design perspective, but he most likely has them because it was a common and increasingly iconic trope.
 
I understand that the character is not technically "Bugs Bunny", but he's basically Bug's Australopithecus. It has been stated that the character eventually became bugs bunny multiple times.

Ultimately the point of my post was that Bugs didn't really need gloves at that point in animation history but he most likely has them because it was a common and increasingly iconic trope.

I'm certain his gloves had it's uses.

https://youtu.be/Fxd2NvkQTTg?t=457
 
Same reason, he's wearing gloves from Super Mario World onwards. Even his NES sprites take care to delineate where his hands are at all time so his run cycle reads properly to the eye.

LoxeuJF.jpg


So yeah, Sonic, Mario and Crash Bandicoot all have their hands contrast with the rest of their bodies for exactly the same reason animators put gloves on their cartoon characters.

While his sprite in Super Mario 3 wasn't wearing gloves, the box art depicts him wearing them. Same with the box art to Super Mario 2.
 
I'm certain his gloves had it's uses.

https://youtu.be/Fxd2NvkQTTg?t=457

A lot of the blackface stuff in the Golden Age Looney Tunes shorts just sneaks up on you man.
There is never any rhyme or reason for it, and half the time it's triggered by the most random things.
All of this serve to make the racism even more uncomfortable considering how well-animated, timeless, and clever they are before they suddenly become the Jazz Singer.
:/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom