BattleMonkey
Member
Its not really just the low skill aspect, but simply these are jobs in which you are easily replaced. Without government bringing down the hammer, nothing will change.
Yes.Manhattan?
The hell? Did you really just say 68k isn't a good living? I lived off a third of that salary for a few years. Personally, I'd feel rich if I made that.
68,000 is a good living everywhere. Stop.
The hell? Did you really just say 68k isn't a good living? I lived off a third of that salary for a few years. Personally, I'd feel rich if I made that.
68,000 is a good living everywhere. Stop.
We're talking 68000 before or after taxes? Cause if it's before, it's pretty weak outside of the locations I mentioned. I should mention that I'm looking at it as a family man, not as a single person.
its more than the vast majority of americans make. it might not be balling in manhattan, but jobs there pay more anyway
We're talking 68000 before or after taxes? Cause if it's before, it's pretty weak outside of the locations I mentioned. I should mention that I'm looking at it as a family man, not as a single person.
You're lying.Not where I live.
That would about scrape someone by.
How many places have you lived? There is some serious 9th ave myopia on GAF
$68,000 for a family is probably not enough to properly save for retirement or buy a house in many parts of the country.
But this is the problem with the working classes. We're all so petty squabbling about tens of thousands of dollars that we let the broken system, costing us in aggregate billions, continue.
You're lying.
A single person living on 68,000 a year can live anywhere in the United States quite comfortably. Even San Diego/San Francisco/Manhattan, etc.
A friend of mine who's in 3rd year Mechanical Eng has been unable to find a single summer internship/co-op job after over 200 applications.
The competition in Ontario for jobs in the STEM field is disgustingly fierce.
68000 is a good living? Please.. maybe in Kansas or some tumbleweed state. The issue is these jobs are now seen as the safety net of society. Kids without higher education can just jump into them and think they can coast through life if they play on the register for 30 years. It's not the 50's anymore and companies are taking advantage of it to make sure their numbers are as good as can be. That's how the cookie crumbles.
That's what I tell my friends in STEM. The few people I know in Psych or Health Sciences are going to get the last laugh.
for some reason i thought the median was lower. I feel worse about my life now. 4 years out of college and 3/4th way to median with no benefits.
Holy crap, I would kill to be able to make 68k.
68000 is a good living? Please.. maybe in Kansas or some tumbleweed state. The issue is these jobs are now seen as the safety net of society. Kids without higher education can just jump into them and think they can coast through life if they play on the register for 30 years. It's not the 50's anymore and companies are taking advantage of it to make sure their numbers are as good as can be. That's how the cookie crumbles.
The article refers to the salary of one person. If you are talking about a family perspective you would need to add in your spouses income. The graph posted earlier shows that the person in the OP, making 68k, makes more than the average household in 95% of the country.Right, I'm speaking strictly from a family perspective. How single people survive is kinda meaningless since their quality of life standards will always vary. I'm sure there are dudes on gaf who are happy if they can afford ramen and games.
This wouldn't be a problem if everybody were an engineer.
You'd think with all that money you could buy some civility and perspective. Guess not.
Also nurses make ~66K? That sounds off...most nurses I know make 32-38K.
You'd think with all that money you could buy some civility and perspective. Guess not.
Also nurses make ~66K? That sounds off...most nurses I know make 32-38K.
You'd think with all that money you could buy some civility and perspective. Guess not.
Also nurses make ~66K? That sounds off...most nurses I know make 32-38K.
I, for one, hope the less skilled never have a living wage and eventually die from starvation. It would allow more money to go to those that are more skilled.
You're lying.
A single person living on 68,000 a year can live anywhere in the United States quite comfortably. Even San Diego/San Francisco/Manhattan, etc.
We're talking 68000 before or after taxes? Cause if it's before, it's pretty weak outside of the locations I mentioned. I should mention that I'm looking at it as a family man, not as a single person.
My dad makes that, and him, my mom, my two siblings and I life comfortably and have for as long as I can remember...
We live in New York (Great Lakes Region)
68,000 is a lot of money. Way more than most people make. Probably close to upper middle class, even with a family.
68k is not enough? My dad owns a house, two cars and paid for my college making around that. Damn GAF got a silver spoon in their mouths.
I love every chance I get to shit on our amazing post-2009 recovery, of record profits and ever-rising stocks... all on the backs of reduced labor, part-time employment, temp jobs, etc etc.
![]()
Are we talking some place north of Syracuse like Fulton? Those are fairly rural areas.
No, we're talking Rochester, a city. I actually live about 10 minutes from the dead center heart of the city.
America is a nation of worthless bums anyway.
here here.
You must have missed the thread where 150k is not much.
Lol. Pretty sure I made a similar post in that thread aswell.
I don't want to get into specifics for everywhere people live, but Rochester in general has a pretty low cost of living.
Can someone explain why this shows an inverse relationship? Other than wages eating into profits?
68,000 is the median salary of Manhattan, the most expensive city in the entire country to live.
You're living well no matter where you live with 68,000 dollars. Even the most expensive city in the entire country, you're still within "average"
You'd think with all that money you could buy some civility and perspective. Guess not.
Also nurses make ~66K? That sounds off...most nurses I know make 32-38K.
Not where I live.
That would about scrape someone by.
Normally you'd expect them to have degrees which rounded them out in subjects like that, but you see resistance to this.My useless English degree has me earning well over the median household income just a few years removed from school. It's funny how people with science degrees tend to make poor scientists and have little skill in communication.
We can stop here because it'll always be subjective on what we consider living well. Hey, as long as people are happy with their quality of life, that's all that matters.
My useless English degree has me earning well over the median household income just a few years removed from school. It's funny how people with science degrees tend to make poor scientists and have little skill in communication.
Sorry to nitpick, but I get annoyed when English majors get shat upon. It's not really the degree, it's how the person uses it.
Except it's been found that those making around 50,000 are the happiest, and that happiness tapers off after that amount (each subsequent raise has less of an impact on happiness).
It's not all subjective, there's actual research on this stuff. 68,000 is a lot of money for pretty much every person in the country, although it's on the lower end of a lot of money in some areas.
A friend of mine who's in 3rd year Mechanical Eng has been unable to find a single summer internship/co-op job after over 200 applications.
The competition in Ontario for jobs in the STEM field is disgustingly fierce.
every business ive ever worked for is ran by the most incompetent writers. its bizarre that adults could be so bad at english
And man am I glad for that. Means I can get in and out of the store faster by using the vacant self-checkout rather than waiting in line.