• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Want a Public Attorney in Louisiana? Good luck - Systemic failure soon (the Atlantic)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Piecake

Member
Carson would like to hire more lawyers, but he hardly has the money for those already on the payroll. When trying to solicit the help of local attorney Anna Ferguson, he initially offered her $1,000 for every 100 cases she accepted, or $10 per case. In January 2015, he cut wages by 10 percent and eliminated travel funds. All of the attorneys in his office hold second, even third, jobs. Carson, too, maintains a private practice, where he spends about 20 percent of his time. “You can’t survive on this salary alone,” said one of the support attorneys. “I do it for the love of Derrick,” said another.

In La Salle, another parish under Carson’s jurisdiction, the swell of cases grew so overwhelming that he enacted a “restriction of services” plan and, mid-summer last year, stopped representing some defendants accused of misdemeanors. While Carson is more desperate than most, “every jurisdiction is headed this way,” he said. “It’s just a matter of time.” More than three-quarters of the state’s 42 public defenders’ offices are struggling to avoid insolvency. The Louisiana Public Defender Board, which oversees every district office, has predicted “systemic failure in the public-defense system” by this summer.

Statewide, public defenders represent more than 85 percent of those who pass through the criminal courts, many of them black and uneducated. Without public defenders available, pretrial detainees awaiting representation will clog the jails, judges will be unable to clear dockets, detention costs will rise, and the state will sink, eventually, into a constitutional crisis for failure to provide adequate counsel.

But as public defenders’ workloads climb, their ability to safeguard client rights suffers. A census of 22 states carried out by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that, between 1999 and 2007, the number of public defenders increased by 4 percent while their caseload increased by 20 percent. Until recently in New Orleans, public defenders assigned to misdemeanor courts each had upward of 19,000 cases per year, affording them an average of seven minutes for every client. Unsurprisingly, some detainees end up staying in jail waiting for attorneys for longer than the potential sentences for the crimes they were accused of. “You can’t dig into the details. There isn’t time to uncover the facts, to marinate in them, to do the research necessary,” Carson said about managing his caseload. “It becomes like herding cattle.”

For public defenders, reliance on these court fees places them in the questionable position of drawing a salary from the guilt of those they represent; defendants who are found innocent pay no court costs. A class-action lawsuit filed in September on behalf of six New Orleans residents alleges that these “financial conflicts of interest have derailed the pursuit of justice.” But questionable ethics aside, this system has proved to be fiscally ineffective year after year. Despite a recent increase in the public defender’s cut of the court fee from $35 to $45, nearly every office operates at a loss. The small chunk of funding that comes from state appropriations—about $16.5 million in 2014—is spread thinner every year to stanch mounting deficits. Districts across Louisiana are firing lawyers and support staff, creating client waiting lists, canceling contracts with basic legal-research services, and dumping more cases on fewer attorneys for less compensation. What’s more, the 2017 annual budget, approved by the legislature, slashes public-defender funding by an additional 62 percent—a cut “that would require additional service restrictions on a scale unprecedented in the history of American public defense,” wrote the president of the American Bar Association in a letter to Louisiana’s governor.

Despite these ongoing violations of the Sixth Amendment, improvements to public defense have proved elusive. “The problem is that this comes down to poor people, often of color, who are accused of committing a crime,” Edwards said. “This group isn’t high on the list of political priorities.” Many people with convictions on their records are not even eligible to vote. (In Florida, Kentucky, and Virginia, felony disenfranchisement affects more than one in five African Americans.) From a political perspective, using taxpayer money to pay lawyers to represent poor people accused of crimes is a tough sell.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/on-the-defensive/485165/

What a gigantic mess. Jindal really fucked that state over. And 10 dollars per case? Holy shit...

Of course, while it isnt an absolute catastrophe in other states, the public defender system looks like it is buckling pretty much everywhere.

This is a really good and really long article. I would definitely recommend reading the whole thing.
 

Piecake

Member
From the same state that brought you the Blue Lives Matter Bill. This doesn't surprise me one bit.

It will be interesting to see what Louisiana does when the Supreme Court or some other court tells them to dramatically increase their spending on their public defense system.
 
It will be interesting to see what Louisiana does when the Supreme Court or some other court tells them to dramatically increase their spending on their public defense system.

Looking at went down in Utah, as described in that article, it doesn't seem like a whole lot will happen.
 

Piecake

Member
Looking at went down in Utah, as described in that article, it doesn't seem like a whole lot will happen.

Those were misdemeanor cases in rural areas though, and the article states that that is actually quite common throughout the US. I am not trying to diminish the fucked up nature of that and argue that isnt a violation of their 6th amendment rights, but that is a whole lot different than the entire public defense system in Louisiana simply imploding, meaning people who are charged with serious felonies won't be able to get representation.

I have a hard time imagining that something will not be done about that because that directly goes against Gideon v Wainwright
 

YN12

Banned
The title of this thread is kind of misleading. Arguably, this is not systemic failure: the system is working exatly as intended (effectively they have defunded public attorneys).

Something like this doesent just happens. It was engineered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom