Jazzy Network
Member
2 months ago I'd probably defend Riot here, but today I lol'ed (see what I did thar?).
We need the Gd Studio back in action. They have Dignitas.Newman plus would probably have a few other people on skype to talk about it. Plus 2GD would talk a bunch of shit about LoL and call SirScoots a pedophile again.
The plot thickens. Is slasher now full of shit? Is scoots embelishing his story? ODEE is actually respectable so I don't know where this puts all of this.
This Dotafan would. It rankles me to see gamedevs trying to monopolize e-sports or dump all manners of red tape and controls on teams and the community, the less accepting we are of this bullshit, the better it is for everyone.
I honestly feel like Dotafans wouldn't care if valve said people couldnt get LoL teams.
Dignitas is my source, not Scoots
SirScoots: Guys like Odee, guys like the guys from Complexity, guys like Alex Garfield who are very interested in maybe looking at League or have League, and are looking at Dota for example in Odee's case, made a very strong case to Riot over the last couple of weeks and said 'Hey you don't need to monopolise like this. We're not the big bad guys here. Let us have our Dota team. Or in Dignitas' case, 'Let us keep our League team and let us do other stuff'
Funny, I had a very different viewpoint of "Valve's awesome things" when I was at S2. Two letters: C and D.I really only want DotA to dominate right now because Valve does awesome things while Riot does stupid shit like this.
So, I just noticed this choice quote from Slasher on TL page that seems weird given what he said afterwards:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=366477¤tpage=23#443
And then I saw this quote from the transcript of the LO3 conversation, referenced here:
http://www.playdota.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6845521&postcount=127
Someone has to be lying here, because the timelines don't match up at all.
Funny, I had a very different viewpoint of "Valve's awesome things" when I was at S2. Two letters: C and D.
This is the most confusing drama ever. I don't know WTF is going on anymore. I don't think anyone would lie about this though.
This is the most confusing drama ever. I don't know WTF is going on anymore. I don't think anyone would lie about this though.
If no one's lying, then it's a huge misunderstanding that got really out of control. I can't imagine any other scenario that makes sense.
Yep. There's really no incentive for these head guys of e-sports to lie on purpose I think.
wat?
Glad we have upstanding posters like you here to elevate the level of discourse.So 11 pages of no substance or real facts?
Silly e-"sport" gamers.
So 11 pages of no substance or real facts?
Silly e-"sport" gamers.
So 11 pages of no substance or real facts?
Silly e-"sport" gamers.
Glad we have upstanding posters like you here to elevate the level of discourse.
You're cool.
what does that make you, a silly "real" gamer?
??
??
??
Funny, I had a very different viewpoint of "Valve's awesome things" when I was at S2. Two letters: C and D.
what does that make you, a silly "real" gamer?
??
??
??
No, silly perhaps, but I don't argue for 11 pages based on rumours.
![]()
amidoingitrite?
Big multigame teams that don't have a LoL team are quite likely more impartial and reliable on this than teams that do. They have neither an incentive to lie nor an incentive to maintain good relationship with Riot. It's plausible that Riot didn't attempt to make this a wider policy and rather only had some talks with a few teams. If the claims were categorically false, I'm certain Riot would be more forcibly denying them and would have more teams issuing statements. Instead, they are only calling it a "big miscommunication".Let me recap for those who are confused and those who like to knee jerk with "this why LoL sucks" - really? haha.
Slasher posts an article with this "rumour" - that Riot has teams signing exclusivity agreements, citing that his source is Dignitas (ODEE is the director of).
SirScoots appears on LO3 and claims the same thing also saying that other guys like CoL and Dignitas have been in talks with Riot for weeks over this stuff.
Odee posts on twitter, denying any association with slasher and that he only heard of this rumour yesterday, when all this drama started.
Since Slasher and SirScoot only mention Odee inorder to seem impartial since he is the only League guy and Odee is the only one you can prove actually has talks with Riot, everything seems very weak now.
Oh slasher, your move.
GAF has a whole thread based on the speculation of the Wii U, would you also consider that silly?.
Big multigame teams that don't have a LoL team are quite likely more impartial and reliable on this than teams that do. They have neither an incentive to lie nor an incentive to maintain good relationship with Riot. It's plausible that Riot didn't attempt to make this a wider policy and rather only had some talks with a few teams. If the claims were categorically false, I'm certain Riot would be more forcibly denying them and would have more teams issuing statements. Instead, they are only calling it a "big miscommunication".
e: https://twitter.com/Totalbiscuit/status/243853361047302144 so many sources, but I guess it's just a rumour/miscommunication
We weren't speculating whether Riot were bad boys or not were they lol.GAF has a whole thread based on the speculation of the Wii U, would you also consider that silly?
This seems to make the most sense.It's pretty obvious at this point that there's some level of miscommunication going on. I think Scoots is the only one to have claimed to not hear it second-hand, the coL guy said he heard it from someone else and Slasher's source is publicly telling him that he's not right at all.
It's a big game of e-sports telephone. Believe who you want I guess, it's probably never going to get cleared up.
Given recent history I'm inclined to believe that someone at Riot told Scoots something he misunderstood and he told every single person he knew about it. Was like two weeks ago he was spreading rumors about prize splitting at MLG with no actual knowledge of the situation. (For what it's worth Riot handled that situation poorly too.)
It's possible that it's a Riot-lead conspiracy involving blackmailing Dig to try to get them to lie for Riot but to be totally honest it's a lot easier to believe that it's a rumor started by one guy, probably without malicious intent, that just exploded. It's just way easier for that to happen than for a company to orchestrate some cover up.
Odee said:@Slasher why do you keep mentioning us? As I told you yesterday we heard a rumour also asked RIOT and they said to us we can get other MOBAs
The problem with this is that CLG, M5, Navi, MTW, Fnatic and AL all have LoL and DotA2 teams and were not stopped or removed by Riot which makes the 2nd bolded sound like rich creamy bullshit by Slasher. It sounds like slasher told a bunch of people and said he had sources, and those people told others while pretending they heard it first or second hand while they in actually heard it third hand.Slasher said:ODEE is only talking about the context of my personal tweet, not of what has happened in the last day and a half. To clarify for everyone:
Scoots not did 'confirm' anything about Dignitas on Live On Three, that was me, he may have said it first because I talked with him during the pre-show. What I confirmed was something you already knew by Tuesday afternoon/Wednesday - that Dignitas COULD pick up a Dota team if they wanted to. That was the first time Riot told a team they could use other games beyond their statement. Digntias simply did not ask Riot previously before that if they could acquire a dota/moba team or not, mostly ODEE just being busy, and he can attest to both of these things. So because Dignitas never asked, they were never told they couldn't. I should have made this more clear.
Complexity and EG did ask regarding acquiring League of Legends teams, EG with dota2 and Complexity with both Dota2 and Hon, and then were given this answer. My original tweet included ire towards Riot for saying it was a misunderstanding between the teams (http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=29022381#post29022381). I includes Dignitas along with EG and Complexity, which is admittedly wrong in this context. Sorry about that.
I was attempting to reach comment from Riot and Valve before releasing this story as a whole, but there's some of it.
Riot doesnt actually control reddit....I wonder why Riot deleted a bunch of reddit comments outright denying this if there is no truth to it
And please, the whole point is that Riot _attempted_ to put a policy like this in place (for some teams only?) not that they actually succeeded so that "problem" isn't a problem at all.
Let me recap for those who are confused and those who like to knee jerk with "this why LoL sucks" - really? haha.
Slasher posts an article with this "rumour" - that Riot has teams signing exclusivity agreements, citing that his source is Dignitas (ODEE is the director of).
SirScoots appears on LO3 and claims the same thing also saying that other guys like CoL and Dignitas have been in talks with Riot for weeks over this stuff.
Odee posts on twitter, denying any association with slasher and that he only heard of this rumour yesterday, when all this drama started.
Since Slasher and SirScoot only mention Odee inorder to seem impartial since he is the only League guy and Odee is the only one you can prove actually has talks with Riot, everything seems very weak now.
Oh slasher, your move.
Sorry, I wasn't trying to represent the order of the events, merely the important elements.This is not the right order of events btw, since it went Incontrol to SirScoots to Slasher in that order as far as I know. People can just read the Teamliquid or Reddit threads if they want to know anyways.
They deleted (some of) own comments. No, your position is illogical and that is a horrendous misuse of occam's razor. Again, no one is even saying they had a policy in place, just that they wanted to push something like that through and failed, possibly very early on when they had only approached some teams.Riot doesnt actually control reddit....
And not only that, its illogical that the policy was put into place for some teams only. Take occams razor - its much simpler to say either that they had the policy in place and removed it (doubtful since many teams had LoL and DotA teams) or that it was just a rumour spread by one person.
On September 07 2012 21:05 EG.Maelk wrote:
iNControL, SirScoots and Slasher wasn't the ones to 'concoct' this as many LoL-followers seem to believe, but merely the first to bring it up in a public setting.
This alledged rumor had been a hot topic for a lot of players during The International from the very beginning of it (approximately two weeks prior to Live on Three) as it so very much concerned them (current as well as future sponsorships).
These 'rumors' were started, confirmed and further developed by players and organizers who this would directly influence and was confirmed time and time again throughout the entirety of the tournament.
When this was then made public, a shitstorm abrupted; not just towards Riot Games but also vice versa against the very people who made this public knowledge as well as the direct competitor (Dota 2). Should there be any hint of truth to these rumors, which I personally full-heartedly believe there is taking into consideration how I know Riot has chosen to do business in the past and what kind of rules they have imposed on the MLG and ESL, it is painfully obvious that some organizers might be scared of the repercussions from the community let alone Riot Games themselves, should they choose to come forward with information confirming these rumors.
Alledgedly, the rule was that organizations could not have a League of Legends team participating in the upcoming pro circuit for Season 3 as well as a team in a competing game of the genre (ARTS/MOBA). Was the rule yet made public? Obviously not. Had all organizations been made fully aware of the intent to enforce this rule? Probably not. Had some organizations been in talks with Riot Games and been informed of these intentions? Very likely. Did Riot Games back off from the rule, before taken into effect, seeing the community's response? Most definitely.
Above questions are obviously assuming the rumor is true. Regardless of true or not, I'm actually pleased that the communities can come together about one thing, the only thing that actually matters: That the rule - if it ever did exist - would be ridiculously stupid.
On September 07 2012 21:05 EG.Maelk wrote:
Alledgedly, the rule was that organizations could not have a League of Legends team participating in the upcoming pro circuit for Season 3 as well as a team in a competing game of the genre (ARTS/MOBA). Was the rule yet made public? Obviously not. Had all organizations been made fully aware of the intent to enforce this rule? Probably not. Had some organizations been in talks with Riot Games and been informed of these intentions? Very likely. Did Riot Games back off from the rule, before taken into effect, seeing the community's response? Most definitely.
You seem to be rather personally invested in this, as if they were attacking you or a game you really like and not a corporation. Unlike you, EG, CoL and whoever else is the source has no incentive to make stuff up. Perhaps you should stop wasting your time.Today I wrote:
Alledgedly, the rule was that organizations could not have a League of Legends team participating in the upcoming pro circuit for Season 3 without sacraficing puppies. Was the rule yet made public? Obviously not. Had all organizations been made fully aware of the intent to enforce this rule? Probably not. Had some organizations been in talks with Riot Games and been informed of these intentions? Very likely. Did Riot Games back off from the rule, before taken into effect, seeing the community's response? Most definitely.
EG should stop wasting time, and just say "WE DON"T KNOW SORRY".
No, silly perhaps, but I don't argue for 11 pages based on rumours.
You seem to be rather personally invested in this, as if they were attacking you or a game you really like and not a corporation. Unlike you, EG, CoL and whoever else is the source has no incentive to make stuff up. Perhaps you should stop wasting your time.
I don't care at all whether Riot tried to do this or not, nor do I care about LoL, Dota 2, my only motivation here is arguing against people who clearly aren't trying to approach the topic rationally, but let their personal biases dictate what they believe rather than assessing the known facts and deeming what is most likely based on them. A fruitless endeavour, certainly.For what it's worth, half the posts aren't even on the subject matter at hand and were some really nice discussion. The other half are over the course of multiple updates to this whole thing.
It's hard to take a lot of posts seriously as there's a lot of shit throwing everywhere ("Of course Riot would do this" kinds of comments, are they really necessary?). Did Riot do this? Eh, I don't know. Would I blame them for thinking of it? Not really. I'd hate for it to actually happen because it's overall something bad for the scene, however, which is something I do believe nearly everyone who cares can agree on.
I don't care at all whether Riot tried to do this or not, nor do I care about LoL, Dota 2, my only motivation here is arguing against people who clearly aren't trying to approach the topic rationally, but let their personal biases dictate what they believe rather than assessing the known facts and deeming what is most likely based on them. A fruitless endeavour, certainly.
It all sounds really dumb and when accusations are heavy, so should the evidence. I agree that such anti-competitive behaviour is terrible but re: the topic, nothing has been proven.
The maelk quote only offers one thing to come of this and that its "Regardless of true or not, I'm actually pleased that the communities can come together about one thing, the only thing that actually matters: That the rule - if it ever did exist - would be ridiculously stupid."
lied about nothing. This was a policy Riot was most certainly putting in place as Riot execs have been talking to some of the top teams about it for the last few weeks. It pains me to see some other people ARE now lying and covering their tracks, but so be it. Perhaps it is in their best financial interest to do so. I firmly stand by what I said on the show, this was no "rumor" made up by outsiders, this was a detail of the S3 plan that was made public and then Riot changed their minds.
Hate me all you want, but if you think I made this shit up to cause drama or you think I hate LoL, well, you are just plain stupid.
I've noticed the thread title change like 4 times.
Cliff notes please.
Riot was disallowing players from competing both in LoL and Dota2. Then apparently they didn't have a problem. What happened after that?
The cliff's notes is that nobody knows. You can read this and decide for yourself: http://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/zh6c1/who_is_telling_the_truth_now/c64nizc
Nobody is willing to come up with hard evidence, and everybody is acting damn shady. At this point its becoming a whole game of he said she said. Rest assured though that if the policy was to do such, Riot has definitely been told to back the fuck down.
On September 08 2012 02:14 SirScoots wrote:
I lied about nothing. This was a policy Riot was most certainly putting in place as Riot execs have been talking to some of the top teams about it for the last few weeks. It pains me to see some other people ARE now lying and covering their tracks, but so be it. Perhaps it is in their best financial interest to do so. I firmly stand by what I said on the show, this was no "rumor" made up by outsiders, this was a detail of the S3 plan that was made public and then Riot changed their minds.
Hate me all you want, but if you think I made this shit up to cause drama or you think I hate LoL, well, you are just plain stupid.
What exactly is SirScoot and Slasher trying to do anyway? If they had won the battle and convince Riot to back off you'll think they'll be happy to tell everyone to move along and ignore the backroom drama, but ATM it sounds like they are determined to paint Riot as the bad guys and are trying to get them punished for something they at worst have though of doing but never confirmed. This feels more and more like a smear campaign to me.
I've noticed the thread title change like 4 times.
Cliff notes please.
Riot was disallowing players from competing both in LoL and Dota2. Then apparently they didn't have a problem. What happened after that?