ItAintEasyBeinCheesy
it's 4th of July in my asshole
Heh, nice thread op.
I think it's when you come in to a thread, don't read any of the posts (possibly not even the OP), say something trollish, and then leave the thread, never bothering to respond again.
The essential component is dropping a bomb and immediately leaving the thread, but the drive by-ness is exacerbated when it's a huge thread with hundreds of posts that you obviously haven't read.
people get all sorts of upset that others have negative opinions, and instead of ignoring them they'd rather endlessly quote someone and derail a thread.
people get all sorts of upset that others have negative opinions, and instead of ignoring them they'd rather endlessly quote someone and derail a thread.
This is thread whining, which could be considered a drive-by, I guess.This thread sucks. The mods should lock it. *Never comes back*
(That is an example.)
This is thread whining, which could be considered a drive-by, I guess.
A drive by post is where you drop in, say something pointless or inflammatory, making it clear you have no interest in the discussion, then disappear from the thread.
This is thread whining, which could be considered a drive-by, I guess.
A drive by post is where you drop in, say something pointless or inflammatory, making it clear you have no interest in the discussion, then disappear from the thread.
I see a lot of "posts xyz and then leaves the thread" responses. What exactly does "leaves the thread" entail? Not responding to a response within some specific (unknown) time frame?
Well, they're both drive-bys, but one is more likely to get you noticed and/or banned. If we banned everyone who ever did a drive by, Mumei and Opiate would be talking to each other in every thread. But if your drive by gets quoted a hundred times, and is clearly intended to inflame, rather than engender discussion, a mod is more likely to notice and present you with a hammer full of ban.Ah ok so more or less little distinction between pointless/inflammatory. Common feature being that you probably don't return.
So the time between being labeled a drive by/banned vs responding is what?Never posting again in that thread.
Hmm I guess I'm a drive-by poster to an extent. I usually read the OP and state my opinion, keep it moving. Most of thw time I wanna be in the conversation but since no one questions me or seems to care, I kind forget about the thread and go on to the nextA drive by post is where you drop in, say something pointless or inflammatory, making it clear you have no interest in the discussion, then disappear from the thread
If we banned everyone who ever did a drive by, Mumei and Opiate would be talking to each other in every thread.
that's a good question
PEACE
So the time between being labeled a drive by/banned vs responding is what?
This is thread whining, which could be considered a drive-by, I guess.
A drive by post is where you drop in, say something pointless or inflammatory, making it clear you have no interest in the discussion, then disappear from the thread.
To be fair, some drive-bys are encouraged by terrible OPs. If you ask a dumb question as the sole content of your OP, you're essentially begging people to come in and say stupid shit before leaving. Threads aren't actually designed to answer simple questions, in part because Google can do that for you. Thread creation, by design, is for discussing topics, which implies a back and forth, not a simple question and answer. I'm often surprised at the number of people who start a thread that could have been answered by Google, since they usually are in the first two or three posts, at which point there's nothing else to really say. A reasonable person, at that point, would quit posting in the thread, but that's not often what happens. Instead people keep answering the question, over and over, make jokes about the question, and generally turn the thread into a frothing mass of pointlessness.
Drive by posts are mostly are myth.
Easy way for people to attack opinions / ideas / posts they do not like without actually having to address the content.