The Artisan
Member
It's not just how I describe it, it's what it is. I've heard people saying "I'm literally dying" - they either don't know what OG literally means and apply it to mean figuratively, or they do know what OG literally means and they just don't care and abuse the term. Both uses I would say are ignorant.I can totally understand wanting to defend the quality of language from what you describe as ignorant use. I felt that way for a long time, before I came to understand that language is far more fluid than I had realised.
i get what you're saying, words are often of course not used stringently.Something to consider though, if language and the definition of words are to be followed stringently, how has the language ever changed? There is no distinction between evolution and devolution as you describe in terms of the changing of a language, it generally tries to reflect actual usage and the digital age has made this much easier to monitor.
People will often say "The Ps4 is destroying the Xbone" - and "destroying" "destruction" probably most people think of like how things become in like war battles and stuff, but the word is used more liberally and kinda metaphorically however, as AgeEighty said, there's no other word known to us that can replace the word "literally", it's the only word to mean what it does.
huh? The word "Arab" isn't derogatory (unless you pronounce it as aye-rab), it's the name denoting a race of some (but not all) of the ethnic groups descended from the Middle East.Words like "Arab" which are obvious derogatory terms are generally segregated as slang.
The race of people descended from South Asia are a different ethnic group but because of current events, most people don't know or care and call all of us Middle Eastern/brown/Arab/Indian/Arabic/Arabian, all interchangeably.
Wouldn't that mean that the OG definition is still just as relevant if not more?The definition is a tad weak, using the word in its own definition. Although it should be noted the informal definition will always be coupled with the formal definition, the latter being used to describe the former.
People should be corrected when the would of/would've shit happens. Even though everyone knows what everyone means and it's all linguistics and semantics, that doesn't make it okay. A word that means a certain thing shouldn't inherit a meaning due to misuse. What kind of language evolution is that?There are some worrying trends occurring within the English language, but it can be difficult to argue with the majority usage. The apostrophe is on its way out, "would of" is rife instead of "would have", all abbreviations are acronyms and now there is not a word in the language that's sole meaning is literally. It's unfortunate.
Yeah we could put it to rest, but I wouldn't be surprised if this discussion continues on in the thread, after all, the thread title..I am however happy to leave it here with opposing views, already enough derailing of this thread.