• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

What makes one drug illegal and another one legal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
BakedPigeon said:
Pharmacy medication is a huge money maker which is the reason all those bad drugs are legal. It would be pretty hard for our government to make money of a legal marijuana because lets face it, weed is not a huge player in the medical field. If they were to legalize it, it would be for recreational use.

I'm not sure I want everyone in the world to be high all the time anyways, nothing would get done.

yes cause everyone is drunk all the time too
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
Sun Tzu said:
When you're drunk, you think you can skateboard, but dude, you totally can't. When you're stoned, you think you can't skateboard, but dude, you totally can.

28s0gk.jpg
 
As others have said it's typically history, money, current attitudes of society. Sure as shit is never about concern for public safety...
 
MrHicks said:
yes cause everyone is drunk all the time too

Maybe you know in which show Hicks says how nice it would be if the world was filled with "happy, hungry, high people" who didn't take life too seriously.
 
The funny thing is that some pharmaceutical companies now want to see if they can profit from THC, so if marijuana ever gets legalized it'll be because they lobbied for it. And in the end it'll probably still be illegal to grow your own.
 
SapientWolf said:
The funny thing is that some pharmaceutical companies now want to see if they can profit from THC, so if marijuana ever gets legalized it'll be because they lobbied for it. And in the end it'll probably still be illegal to grow your own.

Well yeah. That was the whole idea with marinol. Take cannabinoids, and pharmaceuticalize them by trying to eliminate all recreational value.
 
Blackace said:
Again. Weed grows in any climate and grows fast. Beer/Wine and veggies take time and certain climates and skill..

Sure people will buy packaged joints. But the pricing would have to be right. If the super market was charging 75 dollars for a quarter zone of tomatoes more people would be growing.. So I am sure it comes down to pricing..

And just like veggies and beer, corporations could easily mass-produce weed at less than a fraction of the price a single person could.
 
Gilby said:
And just like veggies and beer, corporations could easily mass-produce weed at less than a fraction of the price a single person could.

The cost of distribution, marketing, overhead and all other costs are far beyond what it costs for a weed to grow in your yard.
 
Gallbaro said:
The cost of distribution, marketing, overhead and all other costs are far beyond what it costs for a weed to grow in your yard.
It'd be a LOT less than what the costs for distribution is right now, and the marijuana industry is still a money maker.
 
I don't agree with the argument that marijuana is illegal because it would be too hard to tax. If that was the reason, then how come other things people grow aren't illegal?

My opinion is that marijuana is illegal because past generations had different opinions of it than today's young people do.
 
TheGreatMightyPoo said:
You manage a Taco Bell, don't you??

What are you talking about, Europe doesn't even have Taco Bell!

Also, something's ironic about TheGreatMightyPoo defending UltimaPooh.
 
I have no clue why weed is illegal. 13 days from today there is going to be a Caribbean festival in Miami with all the Marley's performing. I will be smoking weed there, in front of cops, with other people, the entire time(2 til whenever). I just want it to be legal so I can smoke in public with no concerns.
 
pakkit said:
It'd be a LOT less than what the costs for distribution is right now, and the marijuana industry is still a money maker.

Thats because you can't grow it in your yard, the black market gets a huge subsidy in that aspect.

But seeing pot as a contributer to GDP. :lol Its a weed and if you grow it for free, that is no contributer to GDP or cali's tax revenue.
 
Stabbie said:
If that was true, pot would be legal.

It's the reason why it's not legal...

Do you know how much we spend on just the Marijuana portion of the War on Drugs? About 3/4s of the 49 million or so. That's taxes form us going to Police and other drug fighters to fight the supposed crime that is happening.

Now on the other side of the fence, the growers and dealers. They like it to be illegal because when the shit goes into the U.S. the prices double.

Then there are all the people to the side that benefit from it being illegal like cotton manufacturers and cotton farmers.

The only thing the drug laws do is hurt actual law abiding citizens who pay their taxes.

You can learn more with this wonderful documentary:

The Union
 
Lets not forget about all the benefits we would get from stopping the war on Marijuana alone... It would save us billions we can put towards the shortfalls in our budgets or help with education...

Then you can also throw on the taxes, tax them the same as cigarettes if you have to, fine by me. And regulate them like alcohol, making the legal age to use 21.

Then our clothing and textile industries will have new competition through hemp manufactures and growers coming into the industry.

This is currently the worst thing we could be spending our taxes on.

It makes perfect sense.
 
pakkit said:
Which part do you find to be untrue? I'm not saying the media wholly ignores negative effects of alcohol, just that it's overwhelmingly commercial.
I gus its pretty commercial, yeah. That just seems to be a side effect of it being legal, but as a culture, America at least seems to be completely aware of the dangers of abusing booze and the media/entertainment makes sure of it.
 
Because Tobacco and Alcohol are so ingrained American culture they would be impossible to get rid of. Remember Prohibition in the 20's? All it did was cause more crime, so they got rid of it. And I guess you haven't been watching TV or been to a school lately. All you hear all day is "Don't drink and drive." Plus, one beer isn't going to impair you. One joint? Probably.

And what makes what drug legal and another not? Medical benefits. Codeine can be used for many reasons, Weed? Not so much.
 
H.Cornerstone said:
Because Tobacco and Alcohol are so ingrained American culture they would be impossible to get rid of. Remember Prohibition in the 20's? All it did was cause more crime, so they got rid of it. And I guess you haven't been watching TV or been to a school lately. All you hear all day is "Don't drink and drive." Plus, one beer isn't going to impair you. One joint? Probably.

And what makes what drug legal and another not? Medical benefits. Codeine can be used for many reasons, Weed? Not so much.
O rly?
 
H.Cornerstone said:
Because Tobacco and Alcohol are so ingrained American culture they would be impossible to get rid of. Remember Prohibition in the 20's? All it did was cause more crime, so they got rid of it. And I guess you haven't been watching TV or been to a school lately. All you hear all day is "Don't drink and drive." Plus, one beer isn't going to impair you. One joint? Probably.

And what makes what drug legal and another not? Medical benefits. Codeine can be used for many reasons, Weed? Not so much.

Oh, really?

Oh, and how do the current laws not cause more crime? Do tell.

EDIT: Mind meld with Shaka!
 
Like most politics, it's a combination of genuine concern of drug's effects, corporate interest, and misconceptions about the actual dangers/risks.
 
H.Cornerstone said:
Because Tobacco and Alcohol are so ingrained American culture they would be impossible to get rid of. Remember Prohibition in the 20's? All it did was cause more crime, so they got rid of it. And I guess you haven't been watching TV or been to a school lately. All you hear all day is "Don't drink and drive." Plus, one beer isn't going to impair you. One joint? Probably.

And what makes what drug legal and another not? Medical benefits. Codeine can be used for many reasons, Weed? Not so much.

Maybe you should inform yourself on the uses of marijuana and its effects before you say something as dumb as this. (Hint: alcohol impairs you wayyyy more than weed does)
 
Gilby said:
And just like veggies and beer, corporations could easily mass-produce weed at less than a fraction of the price a single person could.

People don't need to smoke pot as much as they do eat or drink. With tobaccoo people smoke a lot more than with pot.. The daily sales wouldn't be there enough to drive the price down into veggie/beer/camel lights like pricing...
 
Sometimes the culprit is the misinformation. Here in my country, cannabis is illegal because it's an "hallucinogen" and dude i've never met someone who trips with weed (and cannabis is a psychoactive)... But they keep teaching fear at schools instead of teach about the difference of plants with history, plants used by old civilizations in rituals like the incas and bad drugs like crack.
 
Immortal_Daemon said:
If weed was legal, here's how I'd imagine the "addicted" smoker's routine would go
I know quite a few smokers who do that every single day, and it's not even legal. It would only increase if it was legal.
And here's the thing, who are you to tell me or anyone else what to do? You're not my parent and neither is the government. How can you call this a free country if I can't do what I want to my own body (as long as I'm not hurting anyone else)?
 
Immortal_Daemon said:
That's not really an argument, though. Cigarettes are only addictive because of the things that have been added to them. Tobacco is kinda lame on it's own, really.

You're wrong. You could smoke/ingest raw tobacco and develop a dependence because of the nicotine in the plant. The additives are for flavor/preservation/etc. I know this first hand due to smoking hookah, which contains very different ingredients than cigarettes.

It would only increase if it was legal.
I highly(pun intended) doubt this assumption is correct. Just because you no longer have to illegally obtain weed doesn't mean you're going to consume more. Where's there logic in that? Peoples lives would go on just as before.
 
CharlieDigital said:
Well, I did lead of tobacco with a caveat.



I think you underestimate the number of people who home brew nowadays. You can easily buy home brewing kits off of Amazon or in specialty stores or any of the hundreds of stores online. Sam Adams even had a whole advertised competition for home brewing

With a 100 dollar investment (and an increased electricity bill), i can grow weed in my closet that is just as good as the weed i buy in dutch coffeeshops or from canadian mailorder. Any master brewer would punch you in the face if he heard you suggest that you could brew beer of equal quality with some home brewing kit.
 
Stabbie said:
What are you talking about, Europe doesn't even have Taco Bell!

Also, something's ironic about TheGreatMightyPoo defending UltimaPooh.

Oh yes we do. It's not popular though and having eaten there I understand why.
 
I love how when I was a child I was told marijuana killed brain cells but alcohol didn't while the reverse is true. We seriously live in a crazy world.
 
BakedPigeon said:
Pharmacy medication is a huge money maker which is the reason all those bad drugs are legal. It would be pretty hard for our government to make money of a legal marijuana because lets face it, weed is not a huge player in the medical field. If they were to legalize it, it would be for recreational use.

I'm not sure I want everyone in the world to be high all the time anyways, nothing would get done.

Alcohol is legal, not everyone goes to work drunk all the time, why would legalising drugs be any different?

Immortal_Daemon said:
That's not really an argument, though. Cigarettes are only addictive because of the things that have been added to them. Tobacco is kinda lame on it's own, really.

The same thing could be done with weed (not saying I'd enjoy that, but it certainly could happen) and then sales would skyrocket.

Besides, even without additives, it's still not an argument. People don't drink even remotely as much as people smoke, yet sales are still perfectly fine. In fact, they're one of the few products that don't suffer during a bad economy.

If weed was legal, here's how I'd imagine the "addicted" smoker's routine would go:
* Wake up, smoke
* Eat breakfast
* Go to class/work
* Eat lunch, smoke
* More class/work
* Go home, smoke
* Eat dinner
* Smoke
I know quite a few smokers who do that every single day, and it's not even legal. It would only increase if it was legal.

Besides, who's to say a pack would include 20 joints in it? People are assuming too much, IMO.

I think this is an interesting point though, I know quite a few stoners who can barely get anything done without getting mashup first, they smoke like cigarette smokers do, it's daft. I can make it through a whole day at work without even breaking a sweat, those people are just weak and making excuses for wanting to get stoned. Use drugs responsibily like you'd treat alcohol and everything is fine, sneak off for a stoner-break in the middle of the day and you're starting to fuck your life up IMO. After all, you rarely get people nipping off at lunch to down half a bottle of vodka.
 
Well, a society that isn't using recreational drugs all other things being equal is better than one that does. Generally, being on drugs makes you a useless person during that time, and society does not benefit from having useless people. They tried to ban alcohol, it didn't work. There's a huge history and culture behind it, and it wasn't happening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom