Slamtastic
Member
Attack of the Clones
What are you talking about?
The Clone Wars has some of the best television CG animation ever ma-
oh
Attack of the Clones
I saw this scene in the bluray version of A New Hope. I was like wait a minute, this didn't happen when I saw it when I was a kid. The Fuck George?
Man, what a swerve.Attack of the Clones
I was about to say that it was hardly bad for a TV show
...then I realised
Dude, spoilers. There was one scene which was even alot worse. A character, forgot who, gets teared apart by two sharks. Causes some good laughs.
Did someone just call spoilers on "Deep Blue Sea"
So we need to just rename this thread, or alternatively, make a new one, called "Attack of Clones is So Terrible compared to the Clone Wars show."
Did someone just call spoilers on "Deep Blue Sea"
Lost submarine scene...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZSvlaiKIE0
CLU's face in TRON: Legacy. I mean, the rest of the movie still looks fine.
I think even in 2010 people were put off and going "uncanny valley," but it was made extra jarring to me after being surprisingly impressed by Ant-Man 'de-aging' Michael Douglas and even Arnold in Terminator Genisys.
http://i.imgur.com/Z1EDO7K.webm
http://i.imgur.com/tPYqH86.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Yeah, I'll disagree with this one because a lot of people complained about that particular scene at release. It's more like The Hobbit situation, there were scenes that laread looked jarring at release despite massive expectations and huge budget.
X-men 3
Mommy, what's wrong with that man's face?
13 years before
Star Wars. Both the OT and the PT.
Spawn deserved better
To be fair, all of the Spy Kids look horrendous.
The commentary track by SLJ is great. At this scene, he laughs about being killed and says goodbye and that's the end of the commentary. I expected him to talk about the rest of the movie, but nope, he was done.
Attack of the Clones
The CGI in AotC looked incredibly bad even in 2002, which is kind of shocking considering how well most of the CGI in TPM has aged. I'd really like to know what led to the massive drop in quality in the CGI between TPM and AotC.Attack of the Clones
Nah, man. I'll take the practical effects from the OT over anything CGI.
As a whole though LOTR doesn't belong anywhere near this thread.There's times in the Lord Of the Rings films with Legolas jumping around it can look bad and and then olyphants have their moments too.
Deep Blue Sea. You know, the shark film with the famous Samuel Jackson scene. Shit is incredible bad.
Ice Age.
I feel like they got worse and worse in the sfx department as pj got more and more drunk on cgi.As a whole though LOTR doesn't belong anywhere near this thread.
Reptile in the MK movie looked pretty bad.
Spawn deserved better
The shark in Jaws looks terrible. Stiff and robotic as fuck.
I feel like they got worse and worse in the sfx department as pj got more and more drunk on cgi.
I remember one of the special features were bragging about the amount of digital effect shots in each movie. There was like a couple of hundred in the first one and by the third one there was 3000 or something. The bad cgi sticks out more when there is cg in almost single scene.
I always noticed this too, even in 2002 and being younger.The CGI in AotC looked incredibly bad even in 2002, which is kind of shocking considering how well most of the CGI in TPM has aged. I'd really like to know what led to the massive drop in quality in the CGI between TPM and AotC.
I rewatched all the SW movies lately, and did the prequel trilogy last. Man there's just waaaay to much CGI in them and it's blatantly obvious like this clip. Like I'm looking at a PlayStation 2 cutscene or something.
But I can forgive it because the movie was made for like $5 by some Canadian trucker.
People are kind of overreacting to this one, since it's the retro art style of the troopers that hides a lot of the graphical fidelity of the actual CG. I'm not saying it looks good, but it looks that way because it's forced to look retro rather than something that would show more details with the same graphical capabilities.
Kind of a video game defence (which is weird to do for a movie), but art style can make a lot of difference. Remember how F.E.A.R. had all those 'extreme' hardware demands but the game was said to be just hallways? That's the problem we're talking about here. FEAR did have the fidelity, it just had a really boring art style to put it into.
Wait what's up with the batman vs superman billboard in the background in the last few seconds??