• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

What time is the MS pre TGS event?

Amir0x said:
This is so silly. Art is a HUGE part of the visual appeal of a title. To try to ignore the giant part it plays is silly, and not even worth trying. How appealing the visuals are is DIRECTLY related to what direction they take.


agreed, art is more important than the technical side of visuals IMO.

not counting framerate which is massively important.
 
What I don't understand is why you guys purposely pick the worst picture of GoW and pit it against the best picture of MGS4?

there are other GoW screenshots you know
7.jpg

7.jpg
 
truffleshuffle83 said:
direct feed hd pic vs. a scan of a mag.
the otacon face looks better than both

He looks like a geriatric going to get the morning paper, not cool at all lol.
 
TwixDawg said:
What I don't understand is why you guys purposely pick the worst picture of GoW and pit it against the best picture of MGS4?

there are other GoW screenshots you know
7.jpg

7.jpg

:lol i think the idea was to present similar shots, ie, human faces!
 
op_ivy said:
why are we hating on amir0x again? mgs looks fucking awesome. the faces look amazing. hate on me too while your at it

by the way;
<----- xbot360

Did you even bother reading what he has been saying in this thread? The guy is hostile, you never know he might kick you in the stomach while debating..
 
op_ivy said:
why are we hating on amir0x again? mgs looks fucking awesome. the faces look amazing. hate on me too while your at it

by the way;
<----- xbot360

I'm not hating on amir0x. It's really not an issue of how good MGS looks- it looks damn good.
But his demeanor on this matter is rather uncomely.
 
TheDuce22 said:
The gears of war shot looks better than the pic of snakes face in just about every way. I dont see whats so artistically impressive about it.


Hey. The art dude has obviously found the absolute beauty and can therefore pass judgement on others about their taste. You should not question him.
 
ban stick for having opinions. riiiiight. ms is dropping the ball, are they forgetting sony has a stronghold on the console market and microsoft actually wants to make money next gen. why would they go to TGS , a country of gamers who already scoffs at them, and not go all out with there presentation. you better believe the people over there who saw the articles in famitsu could give a shit about xbox 360 now!!!!
 
Shompola said:
Are you deliberately acting like a bit hostile tonight?

This has been the closest to an explanation of you and it consists of dumb bashing of yours. Everything else has been just pure people bashing. Naturally I wanted you to be civile and explain it a bit further. It would be ok if you just said that snake has a more appealing look... but no instead you were bashing people back and forth.

I'm not bashing it at all by explaining WHY the GoW pic is less appealing to me. Which I did. And it's not like it's a radical thought, since the same thing has been said by person after person all day.

But no, I'm not acting hostile. I'm acting defensive. I'm debating with a few people, who interestingly all seem to have the same taste in consoles, and I'm the only one bothering to argue right now. So it's me against a few people, I gotta get defensive. I said I feel certain people have bad taste, which is not a bad attitude. It's how I feel, because I have this viewpoint. I have not called anyone "a fucking joke", or bullshitted about putting people on ignore, or any other insult/confrontational statement. You're playing it up for no reason, melodrama.
 
Amir0x said:
I'm not bashing it at all by explaining WHY the GoW pic is less appealing to me. Which I did. And it's not like it's a radical thought, since the same thing has been said by person after person all day.

But no, I'm not acting hostile. I'm acting defensive. I'm debating with a few people, who interestingly all seem to have the same taste in consoles, and I'm the only one bothering to argue right now. So it's me against a few people, I gotta get defensive.

But you're not just defensive, you're offensive too. Not exactly good debating form.
 
Shompola said:
Did you even bother reading what he has been saying in this thread? The guy is hostile, you never know he might kick you in the stomach while debating..

not really. i scanned the thread as best i could in my state and he seemed reasonable. hes been reasonable at least since i've actively viewed this thread.

metal gear solid is the best looking game i have ever seen. this is in stills only, and i'm pretty damn confident seeing the trailier will only inrease its impressiveness
 
SuperPac said:
No mention of Perfect Dark Zero, aye? Wonder if that means it's not launch anymore, or if it's just not one of the titles they're spotlighting for Japan (certainly a possibility -- give Kameo some time to shine).


IIRC the japanese don't care for FPS games, so it would just be a waste of time when X05 is coming soon after.
 
satterfield said:
I think, honestly, it's all about the mods. When people starting pathetically going back and forth like in this thread they should just pull out the warning/ban stick and get to whacking. Maybe that's something I should look into creating myself.

Agreed 100%. They don't even have to be permanent bans either, just SOME kind of sign and indication that behaviour like this isn't tolerated and hold people to a higher standard. Instead they ban people over mag scans that are found 2 seconds later somewhere else on the web, or some nipple slip.
 
Sgt. Killjoy said:
But you're not just defensive, you're offensive too. Not exactly good debating form.

I'm not on the offensive. Saying I feel someone has bad taste is about the furthest I've gone, which is STILL less than others have gone.
 
TheDuce22 said:
The gears of war shot looks better than the pic of snakes face in just about every way. I dont see whats so artistically impressive about it.

well, it's much more realistic. I think GOW's character might be more detailed (his suit especially, i haven't seen a close enough shot of his face to tell) but still looks like a videogame character, whereas snake is much more believable, even though you can see it's not using a huge number of polys (u can count them looking at his chin).
Otacon is probably the best realtime character i've ever seen. Not from a technical pov, maybe, but his facial expression is so..um..deep ?

Anyway, let's not forget what team Kojima did on ps2 despite hardware's limitations...MGS3's models have to be the best i've seen on current gen, it's not really a matter of hardware's capabilities.
 
Yep, awesome trailer. There was a pretty good pause there after it was over though. I was afraid I was going to hear crickets chirping before long. :)
 
Amir0x said:
No, I'm seeing things EXACTLY as they are. That's the benefit of not being blind.

Weak response. You appearantly see yourself fit to rate the artistic value of one higher than the other (including several downright derogatory terms used when describing the other), yet you can't even offer up a decent argument as to how exactly the old man you point to is an example of high artistic value. Typical.

On-topic... that N3 video is pretty damned beautiful. Nice style.
 
AltogetherAndrews said:
Weak response. You appearantly see yourself fit to rate the artistic value of one higher than the other (including several downright derogatory terms used when describing the other), .

Point out where the "downright derogatory" terms are and we can actually continue this discussion on some worthwhile level.
 
op_ivy said:
metal gear solid is the best looking game i have ever seen. this is in stills only, and i'm pretty damn confident seeing the trailier will only inrease its impressiveness

I usually respect your opinion. But Jesus dude, you truly think this:

88ps.jpg



Looks better than this:


857_0005.jpg




I think people's love for MGS is making them overreact about the graphics because from these particular scans there is nothing that is mind blowing IMO.
 
Excelion said:
I usually respect your opinion. But Jesus dude, you truly think this:

88ps.jpg



Looks better than this:


857_0005.jpg




I think people's love for MGS is making them overreact about the graphics because from these particular scans there is nothing that is mind blowing IMO.
lets see......
cg vs. real time check
high res vs. scan check

otacon still looks better
 
Amir0x said:
Point out where the "downright derogatory" terms are and we can actually continue this discussion on some worthwhile level.

... meaning you can't continue the discussion based on what actually suggests a higher or a lower artistic value, despite your insistence that you are somehow fit to judge this. Instead you focus on something that holds little relevance to the actual debate, something that was thrown in squarely in order to serve as an example of your shitty attitude. You've got nothing.
 
Excelion said:
I usually respect your opinion. But Jesus dude, you truly think this:

88ps.jpg



Looks better than this:


857_0005.jpg




I think people's love for MGS is making them overreact about the graphics because from these particular scans there is nothing that is mind blowing IMO.

i'm flattered you usuaully respect my opinion (seriously), but yeah, i think those mgs shots look better. maybe i'd change my mind seeing both in direct captures rather then 1 being a scan though, who knows.

the difference isnt night and day though. i'd certainly never trash the re5 face in regards to mgs4, as it only looks slightly worse (IMO).

and to say that its because i'm blinded by my love for mgs is just wrong. the only game in the series i really enjoyed was mgs3, and i'd hardly say it was without its flaws. ssx i am not
 
AltogetherAndrews said:
... meaning you can't continue the discussion based on what actually suggests a higher or a lower artistic value, despite your insistence that you are somehow fit to judge this. Instead you focus on something that holds little relevance to the actual debate, something that was thrown in squarely in order to serve as an example of your shitty attitude. You've got nothing.

No, I just prefer people back their bullshit up when they try to slander me.

But hey, if it makes you feel better I'm totally at a loss of how to elaborate on my opinion of the artistic direction of MGS4. I haven't totally even been discussing this issue all day on the forums and IRC.
 
Hmmm...looks good, though it's really hard to tell from the resolution of the video. Looks early, but definitely seems like a super Dynasty Warriors type of game. I'm really hoping that there's more to it than that, though...
 
I think Otacon looks (slightly) better than that RE5 shot too......

The fact its realtime is the icing on the cake....

Capcom never said one way or the the other if the RE5 vid was realtime or not, did they ?
 
Amir0x said:
No, I just prefer people back their bullshit up when they try to slander me.

But hey, if it makes you feel better I'm totally at a loss of how to elaborate on my opinion of the artistic direction of MGS4. I haven't totally even been discussing this issue all day on the forums and IRC.

Start by backing up your own claims, dude. I don't care if you've discussed this all day; you made certain bold claims that suggests that you are somehow an authority on artistic merit, and I want you to back that up with something a tad bit more solid than random claims of special excellence and pointers to previous achievements. You saw yourself fit to say "Gears of War face looks like an impersonal, pathetically jingoistic, UE3.0 spoon-fed design that is not only inferior to the Old Snake on a detail level (however "slightly" you may deem it), but is inferior on an artistic level. It's as simple as that", yet you haven't since been able to add anything of substance that could support such a show of confidence. If you want to have a debate regarding artistic value and merit, I'm all for it. If not, then you really shouldn't bring up "art" in the first place.
 
Kleegamefan said:
I think Otacon looks (slightly) better than that RE5 shot too......

The fact its realtime is the icing on the cake....

Capcom never said one way or the the other if the RE5 vid was realtime or not, did they ?

I believe the producer said it was a target render, I'll try to find the quote.
 
everyparty01.JPG


everyparty02.JPG


fareast1.JPG


02_003.jpg


I'm all for the whole "give 360 a chance, you know it's more powerful than it seems" thing.

But holy shit, what is this crap?
 
Top Bottom