• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

What Will You Do If Microsoft's Console is More Powerful?

I'm just so surprised Sony has made their feature set seem nearly impossible to top. The idea of being able to watch a friend play...say, Deep Down, and they can't beat a boss, so they can give control to me through the internet where I can immediately play in their place (like how you and a friend would both play SP games back in the day) is something that is astonishing to me. I still have to see it to believe it.

Stuff like that is going to be hard to beat. We know Sony always makes their hardware more future-proof then Microsoft, but seeing Sony finally pull far ahead of MS when it comes to online features is really, really interesting to me.
 
If it has Halo (which it will) and Alan Wake 2 (which odds are it will as well) and some new IPs that make me giddy I don't care if the PS4 is slightly more powerful. I care about the games and as many have said multiplats are going to be pretty damn a non-factor hardware wise. They're gonna look nice no matter where. That with the 360 design controller wise if continued makes it the preferred system for me. Still, that 8GB of GDDR5 is fucking amazing and sounds juicy.
 
So when did MS hold their press conference detailing the next Xbox's feature set and games? Cause clearly i missed it.
Judging on this gen and last two E3's. Too bad you missed it. It was all revealing about their future focus.
Ofcourse i hope they will give me good reasons to buy a xbox720. But i'm very doubtfull. Last E3 was about streaming content only.
 
I've traditionally been an Xbox guy ever since the first one came out, but I have to jump ship this time around for two reasons: Microsoft hasn't made a consumer-positive decision in years, and their focus is clearly shifting away from games.

I don't want to write a whole big spiel about this right now, but every one of you on this forum knows what I'm talking about. It's a business direction that I refuse to support, especially when I have the option of supporting Sony, who's going the other way.
 
They won't though. We know from all the leaks that Durango is considerably less powerful than PS4. Earlier they had an edge in RAM, but now they are leagues ahead in that too.
 
My enthusiasm for consoles is limited by the controllers, to be honest. I wish I could go console-only for future games, but I need a better controller for first-person shooters for that to happen. I was really disappointed that Sony didn't place that touch pad in a more prominent position.

That said, I'll probably buy the next Xbox over the next PlayStation unless Microsoft does something really, really stupid.
 
I don't think MS can run in two directions at once. Either Kinect 2.0 is going to be their big thing next gen, or they can go after being the biggest baddest. Not both.
 
No, it's not a load of crap. Even in your post, your argument is that of ignorance. The average gamer neither knows nor cares. That doesn't make my argument a load of crap. That makes your argument one for ignorance.


There is no ignorance about it, not everyone lives in the gaming forum bubble that you do. Not everyone gives a shit about forum list wars. Not everyone bases their enjoyment of games on whether or not they are exclusive.


buy both, just like I was going to do anyway? I dont see why this is such a hard thing for people. If you love the hobby then save up and get both, enjoy the best of both worlds.
Pretty much what i did this gen, and next gen will be no different.
 
Nothing. Once launch a comes around I'll see what the line up looks like and if they justify the price for either console.
 
It totally depends on how they handle used games and online. I don't care about specs if my console needs to be online all the time and I can't play used games on it.
 
Alan Wake, Witcher 2, and for the hell of it let's mention Metro 2033, are also on PC, thus adding no value to the 360 as a console.

Exclusives add value to the console. Multiplats can be great games, but if you can play them elsewhere, then they don't make your console more valuable to have.

Microsoft does the bare minimum of support in terms of making exclusive games for their console. They pay third party publishers for timed exclusivity on games and DLC. They bully smaller developers like the guys who made Oddworld.

You're also forgetting how many of the 3rd party games ran better on the 360, a good while. Not to mention that system didn't apply mandatory updates and installs, which took forever. And your also forgetting how Sony didn't support the PS3 that well in the beginning of it's launch. Bad online, lack of quality software and 3rd party exclusivity. Because of this, a lot of people turn to the 360. They've done a great job improving their library lately and the ps4 looks even better.

I do agree, MS titles have been growing stale lately but the 360 has given me a great run. I've enjoyed playing games since i've had it and now it is the time to retire.

Lets hope MS has something good cooked up for the next gen.
 
If the 360 is more powerful, it won't be by much anyway. Doesn't matter a lot in the end. This gen battle will be about features and games, not power.

I don't think MS can run in two directions at once. Either Kinect 2.0 is going to be their big thing next gen, or they can go after being the biggest baddest. Not both.

Sure they can.

Stuff like that is going to be hard to beat. We know Sony always makes their hardware more future-proof then Microsoft, but seeing Sony finally pull far ahead of MS when it comes to online features is really, really interesting to me.

So why has the PS3 a shorter life then than 360?
 
There is no ignorance about it, not everyone lives in the gaming forum bubble that you do. Not everyone gives a shit about forum list wars. Not everyone bases their enjoyment of games on whether or not they are exclusive.

You're obfuscating the point by hurling insults.

The people who frequent Neogaf know a lot more about the behind-the-scenes of video games than other gamers. It's true.

But once again, you're arguing for ignorance and that doesn't help what you're saying.

We're talking about real value, not perceived value. You're arguing that the 360 had real value, but only because people perceived it that way through ignorance.

It's not about list wars, either. I wasn't talking solely about numbers of exclusives.

I mentioned practices. Microsoft charges the gamer to play the multiplayer portion of their games. In the case of Halo 3, I was also subjected to mode lockouts until I purchased the DLC maps. I thought that was unfair. I paid to play team slayer and was told I couldn't play it until I paid more money.

And you're still talking about exclusives and multiplats as though I'm arguing that one is better than the other.

What I was arguing was that a multiplatform games (if running comparably the same on other platforms) don't really provide any additional value to a console so they don't factor into it.

Again, there's a whole lot more stuff I said before, not regarding games but regarding subscription models, shoddy hardware manufacturing, and shady business practices like bullying small studios and paying for timed exclusivity. This was all in the OP post as well, but I guess you chose to ignore it.

You're also forgetting how many of the 3rd party games ran better on the 360, a good while. Not to mention that system didn't apply mandatory updates and installs, which took forever. And your also forgetting how Sony didn't support the PS3 that well in the beginning of it's launch. Bad online, lack of quality software and 3rd party exclusivity. Because of this, a lot of people turn to the 360. They've done a great job improving their library lately and the ps4 looks even better.

I do agree, MS titles have been growing stale lately but the 360 has given me a great run. I've enjoyed playing games since i've had it and now it is the time to retire.

Lets hope MS has something good cooked up for the next gen.

I'm not forgetting it. In fact, what I'm remembering is that many of the major third party support that the 360 received was still through multiplatform games like Mass Effect and Bioshock, which later went to the PS3.

As for the installs and updates, yes they are annoying. They're also completely innocuous issues not worth mentioning because they don't hamper the quality of the PS3 at all.

Sony's initial support for the PS3 could have been better. I'm not sure how that matters now. Ultimately, we saw where Microsoft went with their console and we saw where Sony went with theirs.
 
There's almost no chance that one console is going to be WAY more powerful than the other. They're both going to be courting the same multi-platforms and they want to keep their price as low as possible. Maybe Microsoft's official specs will come out and we'll say "they have 12 GB of GDDR5 RAM! Sony is fucked! PS4 is unplayable!" but it's just not going to matter that much in reality.

Same thing with this gen. PS3 is more powerful, I guess? Alright. You can maybe make a case that something like Uncharted 2 looks slightly better than anything on the 360. At the end of the day, though, what the end user gets on either side is basically comparable. Multi-platforms look mostly the same.

If the new XBox is actually way more powerful and costs $1000 or whatever, we're probably going to be looking at an Atari Jaguar kind of situation.
 
From the sound of things, it will be hard for MS to trump PS4 in terms of power. But again, it's totally up to which console offers better exclusives and the fact that I have a Vita already makes my initial decision to stick with Sony a little bit easier.
 
It's not more power that Microsoft has to show - it's a better lineup of games. I know when buying a PS4 that I can expect, in due time, their amazing first party stable to get to work on exclusive games that justifies choosing their platform. The 360 had the most lacklustre first party of the big three last gen and moneyhatted third parties to get where they were. While I don't doubt the latter happening again, most of it is usually just timed exclusive for popularist games like COD which I don't play, and are eventually available on other platforms. Their first party consists of Forza (don't care about sim racers any more), maybe a new PGR (DriveClub probably has that area covered), Halo (4 was good but it's not a system selling franchise for me any more) and I guess Gears but that series ran its course already. Rare are dead, Fable hasn't been worth a damn since the first one and I doubt they can get exclusive niche Japanese support again this gen.

Then there is also all the Kinect garbage they will no doubt be running their mouth over at E3, whereas Sony are more focused on traditional DS4 controlled games than their competitors. I hear news that MS are wanting to push for new studios making new IPs, so perhaps they can recover this sinking ship, but for now Sony seem like the last bastion of hardcore gaming.
 
It's not more power that Microsoft has to show - it's a better lineup of games. I know when buying a PS4 that I can expect, in due time, their amazing first party stable to get to work on exclusive games that justifies choosing their platform. The 360 had the most lacklustre first party of the big three last gen and moneyhatted third parties to get where they were. While I don't doubt the latter happening again, most of it is usually just timed exclusive for popularist games like COD which I don't play, and are eventually available on other platforms. Their first party consists of Forza (don't care about sim racers any more), maybe a new PGR (DriveClub probably has that area covered), Halo (4 was good but it's not a system selling franchise for me any more) and I guess Gears but that series ran its course already. Rare are dead, Fable hasn't been worth a damn since the first one and I doubt they can get exclusive niche Japanese support again this gen.

Then there is also all the Kinect garbage they will no doubt be running their mouth over at E3, whereas Sony are more focused on traditional DS4 controlled games than their competitors. I hear news that MS are wanting to push for new studios making new IPs, so perhaps they can recover this sinking ship, but for now Sony seem like the last bastion of hardcore gaming.

I agree with pretty much everything here, except that to me Forza Horizon 2 would be a system seller if it were announced. Forza Horizon on 360 is one of the best games I've ever played.
 
irrelevant for me, I mean I had generally good (and some bad) experiences with my 360 but next gen I want a change and that will be the PS4
 
Power doesn't matter, look at the PS2, the weakest console of that gen and it wiped the floor with the Gamecube and the XBOX. Look at the Wii....no, let's not, it was a dust collector in many homes.

Anyway, I am not interested in the 720 for a variety of reasons.

- The ads, I hate all the ads
- The Paywall
- Rumors of no used games
- Rumors of always online DRM

You scratch the rumors off and we are still left with the first two things. Power has nothing to do with it.
 
I'll be hyped that PS4 is the lowest level for multiplatform development (be honest, no love for Wii U).

I'd still get the PS4 at launch and the Xbox MAYBE later if no always on/always Kinnect stunts are pulled and they get exclusives that interest me more than the curren ones.
 
My mind would be blown, and yes I probably would buy it even with all of the always online, XBLG, no used games crap.
 
I'll be stunned if it's more powerful. In fact, I'll be surprised if it isn't considerably less powerful.

Why anyone would want that is entirely beyond me. It's going to prevent the vast majority of titles (i.e., 3rd party games) from reaching their true potential because the lowest common denominator will act as an anchor.

If the spec rumors are true, the whole thing is depressing. Plus, I actually like some of Microsoft's games. I would buy the console for Halo, Forza, and Crackdown alone.
 
The next Xbox will definitely be weaker but not weak enough to see a huge difference in 3rd party games. Think PCs specced with one right above the other. The top of the line will definitely perform but the slower one could do just as well if coaxed right.
 
Again, there's a whole lot more stuff I said before, not regarding games but regarding subscription models, shoddy hardware manufacturing, and shady business practices like bullying small studios and paying for timed exclusivity. This was all in the OP post as well, but I guess you chose to ignore it.

Sounds like you really have a bone to pick with Microsoft. Sony's no angel either, in the past few years they've managed to close at least 3 in house studios, mandate online passes for all first party games, getting platform exclusive content for a multiplatform game, and lest we not forget about when psn went down for 6 weeks and personal info was compromised.

What you asked in the title and what you're preaching now, it seems like you had a different intent in making this thread.
 
Sounds like you really have a bone to pick with Microsoft. Sony's no angel either, in the past few years they've managed to close at least 3 in house studios, mandate online passes for all first party games, getting platform exclusive content for a multiplatform game, and lest we not forget about when psn went down for 6 weeks and personal info was compromised.

What you asked in the title and what you're preaching now, it seems like you had a different intent in making this thread.

.
 
There's a whole lot more to it than that.

I used to think just like that. But then I realized that when you pay for something, you're basically approving of it and everything the company that makes it does.

I really hope you arent wearing anything made in china. Because if I had that logic, I would be sitting here naked living under a bridge. I dont support the conditions in Foxconn, but I want an iphone. Paying for something does not equal you support EVERYTHING a company does. Thats ludacris. I ate chik fil a yesterday too, and I definitely dont support their owners beliefs on some things.

There is nothing more to it than, buy the console you want to play. I dont own a nintendo handheld because those games arent for me, but I know they have tons of quality games.

What are you gonna do if Microsofts console is more powerful? Not buy Sonys because its slower by 1%, and not play the games you love?
 
I don't really care about the power of the systems. That's what my PC is for. A large part is going to be more for the exclusive digital titles and certain exclusive disc based games.

Currently I'm more interested in Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica that I am 343.

Probably the biggest thing is where most of my friends are going to be. A lot don't know or care about system specs, whether you can buy/sell used games, or all the information that will be coming out in the future. They seem bought into a particular ecosystem. So we'll see what happens.
 
I always buy both consoles anyway, but I game primarily on the system that appeals to me most not the most powerful.

So we shall see what MS has in store but so far Sony is blowing me away with what they have shown so far.

However that being said, it's going to be impossible for the Durango to top the PS4 in terms of raw power. MS has a different strategy in this upcoming GEN than Sony and they are moving away from appeasing us(the excitables) with raw power and on to becoming a media / family hub.

The specs will be decent, but they will not be PS4 specs. Mark my words.
 
Won't care as I typically don't for MS systems. The idea of trumping the PS4 in graphics and gameplay (ha ha, not with corridor shooters) is laughable at best.

Also laugh as MS pulls a $599. Even worse if no used games is confirmed.
 
I'm only buying one next-gen console and, at the moment, I'm closer to PS4 because I really like Sony's direction.

With that said, it's funny how some people act as if PS4 is going to be so much better than the next Xbox.

I'm not going to jump early into next-gen, I'll wait to pick the console with the most interesting exclusives.
 
Sounds like you really have a bone to pick with Microsoft. Sony's no angel either, in the past few years they've managed to close at least 3 in house studios, mandate online passes for all first party games, getting platform exclusive content for a multiplatform game, and lest we not forget about when psn went down for 6 weeks and personal info was compromised.

What you asked in the title and what you're preaching now, it seems like you had a different intent in making this thread.

No, my intent is the same. It is this: can a more powerful console from MS make you forgive or forget about all the negative aspects of owning an MS console?

I remember Sony giving me inFamous and LBP for free following that PSN downtime. I didn't even have CC info tied to my PSN.
 
Top Bottom