Sleeping Lesson
Member
I was ready to get the Vizio P series, but that ~20ms latency on the KS8000 while in HDR mode is preeeeeetty compelling.
This isn't really true though, the part about game mode looking bad. Game mode looks bad out of box because the sharpness is cranked all the way up for some reason, but if you calibrate your game setting to the exact same as your movie setting there is no noticeable difference in pq. Ive tested this extensively on both PC at 1080 and 4k 444 chroma and on my ps4.Yes the Samsung upscaler is very good. Sadly if you disable all those bells and whistles like when enabling game mode for the best input lag situation, the quality gets a massive hit and the picture looks blurry grainy and with the nosie effect I explained. Many 1080p don't suffer that much on a 4K TV but many others suffer so much especially if they weren't conceived to run on such screens like P.T, Infamous Second Son (that is why it is getting a PS4 Pro treatment), Outlast etc.. and many indie games.
I made a thread about it few months ago.
There is no calibration tools and disks out there either for now. It's why I reconsidered buying a Sony ZD9As far as I'm aware, there are no reliable latency figures for 4K HDR output anywhere. I really wouldn't a buy screen now.
that quote is complete BULL
My vizio is 36ms in game and its a fucking joke playing competitively with it. Absolutely terrible for call of duty, or any shooter.
If I remember correctly 16ms is roughly 1 frame of delay at 60hz, meaning you would be missing over 2 frames of response on the sony. It's pretty noticeable, tolerable yes......but competitive you want probably 20 or lower
Maybe if your definition of competitive is MLG or something. I would hazard a guess that the majority of people online are playing on TVs with more than 50ms (and some over 100ms) of input lag.that quote is complete BULL
My vizio is 36ms in game and its a fucking joke playing competitively with it. Absolutely terrible for call of duty, or any shooter.
If I remember correctly 16ms is roughly 1 frame of delay at 60hz, meaning you would be missing over 2 frames of response on the sony. It's pretty noticeable, tolerable yes......but competitive you want probably 20 or lower
In Europe, the KS8000 is the KS7000, and the US KS9000 is the KS8000.
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/quantum-dot-display/UE65KS7000UXXU
I was ready to get the Vizio P series, but that ~20ms latency on the KS8000 while in HDR mode is preeeeeetty compelling.
Where are people getting these HDR mode input lag numbers? Is there a different term being used, because I can't find them anywhere.
That's correct, for HDR support it is necessary to use HDMI 1 - 4 on the Vizio P. We measured an input lag of 62.1ms when sending an HDR signal with 'Game Low Latency' on HDMI1 on the Vizio P. This is quite high for gaming, and will be an issue for a lot of people. The KS8000 is a good choice. We found that when sending an HDR signal, it is necessary to set the color space to 'Native' but then it successfully plays HDR content even with the 'Game' special picture mode. We measured the input lag with HDR metadata and 'Game' mode enabled to be 22.6ms.
Review sites. Rtings is a good one because of how granular their measurements get. Here's a quote by them:
Wait what? I thought the KS8000 is the KS8090 in EU/Germany. Man these model numbers are so stupid.
Just to be clear then, the only place to find these things is within the actual reviews (I didn't see anything on RTings specifically listing those types of tests and scores beyond just the basic input lag scores). There isn't a collection of scores specifically about HDR input lag, only what the reviewer references, if they mention anything about it at all.
Careful with these year's vizios. I personally wouldn't recommend them. Rtings concluded these tvs accept a 4k@60@4:4:4 signal but don't actually display it. They only display something close.
Test pattern on Vizio P-series:
![]()
![]()
Test pattern on Samsung KS9000:
![]()
![]()
As you can see, the color test patterns above are blurry and show evidence of chroma subsampling. This is a common trick on cheaper televisions. The luma (brightness) is at 4k, so monochrome test patterns look clear, but the chroma (color) is at a lower resolution so the color patterns look blurry.
Also, the composite input doesn't accept 240p, so a lot of legacy game consoles like the NES will not work on it.
And the HDR does not work with the fast HDMI port (HDMI5) at the same time. You have to choose one or the other.
If you're looking for a recommendation, I would recommend the KS8000. Low input lag, impressive brightness and local dimming, and relatively affordable.
So apparently, Vizio doesn't support Amazon video due (I assume) to their partnership with Google Cast. That's probably a deal breaker for me. Looks like I might be getting the Samsung after all.
Not precisely what you're saying, no. Rtings is really useful though, they have some breakdowns of, for example, the Input Lag of TVs, or the Best HDR TVs (Fall 2016) where they mention lag in every description. Their reviews also compare each TV to similar ones and tell you what's better at what.
You gotta do a little leg work, but the information is out there and is easier to access than it has ever been.
Ah shit, really? And now I'm just realizing the Samsung doesn't support Dolby Vision. What am I missing out on without that? I believe Netflix streams both. It's just impossible to get everything at this price point.
You're right, the specific info you're looking for isn't in a tidy list. It kind of can't be, though. Some TVs turn off HDR in their Gaming mode, while other have discrete Gaming and HDR settings (among other post-processing stuff) that can be toggled independently so you end up with a matrix of potential configurations and their resulting input latency timings.That is what has me confused I guess. Looking at the Input lag link you've included, I don't see anything that specifically says anything about HDR related input lag. The Input Lag score is presumably everything in game mode (Everything off), with interpolation (the weird motion translation business that I hate), and "Outside" which seems like a generic catch-all. The only references to HDR specifically are those you find in the reviews. Unfortunately, not all reviews say something about HDR related input lag.
I suppose it's still early days, but there are plenty of question marks for TVs with HDR right now as far as their input lag.
I thought a lot, but was corrected in an earlier post. Apparently only Vudu streams HDR content exclusively in Dolby Vision. All the others, including Netflix as you mentioned, either stream both or just HDR10.
I've realized that there is no perfect 4K TV for both movie watching and gaming at the moment. For me, it's either go with the Samsung or wait until next year.
I have always used gaming monitors with my ps4 if i get the pro is there any 4k HDR monitors available?
there are none atm, next year there should be some.
That is definitely a concern since it seems like a key upgrade?The Vizio P-series support HDR in game mode. Latency is in the 60s. They also support HDR10, although I'm not about new HDR features going forward.
Ah shit, really? And now I'm just realizing the Samsung doesn't support Dolby Vision. What am I missing out on without that? I believe Netflix streams both. It's just impossible to get everything at this price point.
In Europe, the KS8000 is the KS7000, and the US KS9000 is the KS8000.
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/quantum-dot-display/UE65KS7000UXXU
Now I realize the KS8000 doesn't support 1080p@120hz, something the Vizio P-series does. Gaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!
[EDIT] The Samsung DOES support 4K60hz 4:4:4 though, which the Vizio does not. Shit.
Now I realize the KS8000 doesn't support 1080p@120hz, something the Vizio P-series does. Gaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!
[EDIT] The Samsung DOES support 4K60hz 4:4:4 though, which the Vizio does not. Shit.
Regarding the Vizio P-Series (and 4K HDR sets in general, I suppose):
Regarding input lag, I'm not a pro gamer. I just want to make sure the games feel good. I'm not going to be playing competitive MP shooters to the point that I'll blame an extra 10 ms of lag on my performance. However, my current 1080p TV, I can definitely notice when Game Mode is turned off. It's a noticeable and terrible lag.
So, I'm getting a bit confused, specifically around the idea that input lag differs depending on which modes are on, and which HDMI inputs allow which modes (a problem that I find kind of hilarious).
So, I have a PS4 (soon PS4 Pro), Xbone S, Wii U, and PC (that I use to game, watch movies, and a ton of other stuff. heavy use), all of which I'll connect to my hypothetical Vizio P-series TV. Assuming I'd like the ability to watch 4K Blu-rays on my One S, and I'd like to best maximize the potential of each platform with as little sacrifice as possible in the input lag department, how the hell do I set this TV up?
I've seen the test image, but how big a difference does it make on the actual screen? Is the text going to look worse than on my 1080p TV?Now I realize the KS8000 doesn't support 1080p@120hz, something the Vizio P-series does. Gaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!
[EDIT] The Samsung DOES support 4K60hz 4:4:4 though, which the Vizio does not. Shit.
The first-worldiest of problems.Looks like you are in a bit of a pickle.
Yeah I think it's still the Samsung. If I can run a game at 1080p/120hz, I might as well just play it at 4k/60.I love high framerates, but I tend to leave them in the monitor realm and don't worry about going over 60fps on a TV. The games that I care about hiting 100+ fps with are games that I'm going to want to sit at my desk with a mouse and keyboard with, anyway.
Get the Samsung, 4:4:4 is pretty important imo.
Depends on the 1080p TV. 4:4:4 is very important if using your TV as a monitor (which I will be).I've seen the test image, but how big a difference does it make on the actual screen? Is the text going to look worse than on my 1080p TV?
The first-worldiest of problems.
Yeah I think it's still the Samsung. If I can run a game at 1080p/120hz, I might as well just play it at 4k/60.
Depends on the 1080p TV. 4:4:4 is very important if using your TV as a monitor (which I will be).
I was wondering the same, I'm looking at a Vizio P-series and will be using it as a monitor, and some googling found that using 1080p with certain settings yields a pretty solid image.
Edit: This is the forum I was looking at. There are some settings listed here that people say work well at 1080
Yeah I was veeeery close to deciding on the 2016 P series, but the 4:4:4 (in 4k) and input latency made me switch to the Samsung. By all accounts both are fantastic displays though, we're just being picky because we can be.
Found Vizio P and KS8000 for the same price. Which one should I get?
The Vizio is FALD and supports Dolby Vision with good local dimming.
The KS8000 is Edge-Lit and no DV support and has lower latency with bad local dimming.
How playable ~60 ms lag is for single player games? I don't care about competitive multiplayer.
Your Vizio input lag is just about average for HDTVs. I can guarantee you that many of the people that kick your ass in Call of Duty are playing with "terrible" 30ms+ input lag as well.
Maybe if your definition of competitive is MLG or something. I would hazard a guess that the majority of people online are playing on TVs with more than 50ms (and some over 100ms) of input lag.
Now reading horror stories about light bleed and bloom with the KS8000. Will my torment ever end?
I think I'll go to Best Buy and look at it for myself tomorrow.
The LG has no wide color gamut. HDR will have no effect on colorsCan someone tell me if there's any real reason to buy this Sony instead of this $200 cheaper LG?