If atheists get fedoras, what do us agnostics wear???
Then you'll get into the whole "agnostic doesn't necessarily mean you are neither theist nor atheist" debate.I just call myself agnostic so I am not associated with the people from r/atheism.
Shame.If atheists get fedoras, what do us agnostics wear???
Agnosticism is just saying you lack knowledge about the claim of a deity existing
No one knows for sure.
If atheists get fedoras, what do us agnostics wear???
Why is that?
You said you're "openly non-religious". Which means you're somehow broadcasting that you're Atheist. My point being if you're atheist there's no reason for you to tell people you are, and no reason why you really should care to unless someone asks.
Disgusting that the GAFer has his image associated with that label by lazy assholes who strawmen.Years and years ago. There are a few things I could point towards. Firstly is that there are a few groups of prominent atheists who say dumb things. Although a large amount of the reddit/fedora image macros are completely made up for laughs. We've got a gaffer who is the face of one of those "milady" fedora atheist memes. It was not made with his consent and he was originally wearing the stuff as a joke to begin with.
Second, they are prominent enough to be well known despite usually being a minority in any given country. In the US there was a wave of atheist authors in the 2000's, Dawkins, Hitchens etc. So everyone knows about them thanks to media attention over that period.
Third, atheists are generally assumed until proven otherwise to be straight white males living in Europe/America (for English Language websites). They do not correlate with any major minority groups in this regions. Because of this they are generally considered to be maximally privileged, if you're into the sort of scene where people talk about that stuff with regularity. Any punching will be punching up or at least sideways.
This all combines into them being an extremely safe target to hate and mock openly, especially if you're part of a community that generally prides itself on tolerance and modern social issues. You won't get called a racist, you won't get called a sexist, there is no social mechanism for limiting your ability to make faux image macros to post on facebook about it. You can laugh about how they're fat, unfashionable, smelly, ugly, and arrogant. Whenever someone tells you that you might be being too harsh you can always fall back to the classic "oh I'm just talking about those atheists, not those other nice ones", or better yet say "Oh atheists are so annoying but agnostics are fine and respectful". You can generalize and hate at will, basically.
When Dawkins went off the fringe.
He's the poster boy for Atheism and he's as extreme as a right wing religious nut denying a day couple a marriage license based on "faith".
But he's just a stigma, you have to move through it and be stronger than him. Not all atheists are like him same as not all Muslims are terrorists or Catholic priests pedophiles, but mud sticks and people like to think the worst of things they don't know or understand.
When Dawkins went off the fringe.
He's the poster boy for Atheism and he's as extreme as a right wing religious nut denying a day couple a marriage license based on "faith".
But he's just a stigma, you have to move through it and be stronger than him. Not all atheists are like him same as not all Muslims are terrorists or Catholic priests pedophiles, but mud sticks and people like to think the worst of things they don't know or understand.
because it basically says (and correct me if i got it wrong) that as an atheist you should/could just stay quiet or play along and lead a double life to your family and friends if religious matters come up.
Coming from a Muslim family and knowing what it took to "come out" as an Atheist. It's quiet aggravating to hear someone say that Atheists could/should simply hide their atheism in religious households to avoid problems.
i'm glad if it worked for you. But it doesn't work for many other atheists living in religious households that want to live their life without having religion pushed onto them. Christian/Muslim it really doesn't matter.
People like Dawkins, Gervais, and Maher basically shat on the notion for religion to be critiqued and discussed in a respectful way.
You said you're "openly non-religious". Which means you're somehow broadcasting that you're atheist. My point being if you're atheist there's no reason why you really should care about informing someone unless they ask.
If atheists get fedoras, what do us agnostics wear???
I'd say at the very moment this was posted to the internet:
Just to be clear, Im not a professional quote maker. Im just an atheist teenager who greatly values his intelligence and scientific fact over any silly fiction book written 3,500 years ago. This being said, I am open to any and all criticism.
In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony gods blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence."
suspenders?
It's been said that atheism is not a religion in the same way that "off" is not a TV channel.
Well, atheism became a joke whenever many of the people who turned their TV off started forming clubs about how mentally superior they were for turning off the TV and how everybody else watching TV are delusional sheep.
New Atheism is not particularly helpful and most people engaged in that community can't get over their own smug sense of self-importance.
He's the poster boy for Atheism and he's as extreme as a right wing religious nut denying a day couple a marriage license based on "faith".
It's been said that atheism is not a religion in the same way that "off" is not a TV channel.
Well, atheism became a joke whenever many of the people who turned their TV off started forming clubs about how mentally superior they were for turning off the TV and how everybody else watching TV are delusional sheep.
New Atheism is not particularly helpful and most people engaged in that community can't get over their own smug sense of self-importance.
Let me break it down to a very basic level. I had friends that were Catholic. An example of being "openly non-religious" would be my 12-year-old self stating that I didn't understand what it meant to "go to catechism" (which is how they worded it) because I didn't go to church while eating at their dinner table.
It isn't like I was spewing forth tracts of Nietzsche as a 12-year-old.
Is r/atheism really that bad? I've never been there until a few minutes ago, and I don't see any topics on the first few pages that seem obviously stupid.
When Dawkins went off the fringe.
He's the poster boy for Atheism and he's as extreme as a right wing religious nut denying a day couple a marriage license based on "faith".
But he's just a stigma, you have to move through it and be stronger than him. Not all atheists are like him same as not all Muslims are terrorists or Catholic priests pedophiles, but mud sticks and people like to think the worst of things they don't know or understand.
Sounds like you're just talking about people on the internet. New Atheism's forerunners are people like Harris, Dawkins, Hitchens and Dennet, and they have a lot to bring to the table.
Is r/atheism really that bad? I've never been there until a few minutes ago, and I don't see any topics on the first few pages that seem obviously stupid.
On the one hand, subjectively that's possible, on the other hand you might as well be saying that Chumbawumba fans are just as obnoxious as Justin Bieber fans.Internet atheists are just as fucking obnoxious as internet christians.
They're also dicks about it.
My real question is why all these Canadian forumers here are suddenly claiming their country to be a hot bead of anti religious sentiment when its numbers really aren't that different from America.
Well atleast on the internet it was when the lack of religion became the religion.
This goes a bit too far, I think. It sounds to me a lot like the double standard where people will perceive gay people doing perfectly ordinary things in public as somehow flaunting their sexuality. There are lots of occasions where it's going to be appropriate for someone to reveal their lack of religious belief, or where religious people ought to be more sensitive to the fact that there are people who don't agree with them present. Just as it's asinine to get mad about a Facebook post asking for prayers in a hard time, it's pretty insensitive to express condolences in a peculiarly religious way to an atheist (e.g. "he's in a better place").
There's a huge gap between going out of your way to push your religious views on other people and acting or speaking in an unguarded way such that sometimes other people can deduce what your religious views are. Like, one can visibly not join others in prayer, and one can reasonably object to a sort of assumption of universal Christianity that shoehorns group prayer into everyday activities. Or someone might just make a joke about being able to sleep in on a Sunday. There are a lot of little ways that religious practice/belief or the lack thereof can come up in conversation, and it's not so much that it's very important to be able to say any particular thing so much as it is that it's important not to have to be careful not to say any of a whole bunch of things (again I think the analogy to homosexuality works pretty well here).
self-hating atheists are the worst. also "agnostics".
This over and overBecause many of them have become insufferable and annoying. I say this as a non religious person.
What? I'm "agnostic" (with quotes, as you put it). How does that makes me "the worst"?