Alligatorjandro
Banned
gators offend me
Im offended by racists.
gators offend me
You're probably right, but fucking hell, you're trying really fucking hard if that offends you. His name, in pixellated, barely legible form, written on the floor of a fictional arena, in a piece of software. You need to just let some of 'em go, surely!Wasn't the MW2 problem that Allah was written over a toilet? As for the Tekken that was simply it is disrespectful to trample over god.
why are there like only two fonts ever used on these 'meme-ish' pictures?
Im offended by racists.
Yeah, sure it's okay to offend people, but you have to think of what kind of person you are if you're constantly offending people.
Yeah, sure it's okay to offend people, but you have to think of what kind of person you are if you're constantly offending people.
I wouldn't be offended because I know your existence is about to be removed by myself.
So go ahead![]()
Honestly can't think of one instance where I gave a shit when someone was offended. This cry baby attitude takes away from the actual issue if there is one.
I know it's not religion but I'm reminded of the ESPN guy who got fired for "a chink in their armor' tweet referring to Super Lintendo and the NY Knicks. I can understand some people being offended but I can't in good conscious agree that firing him was the proper choice. Why must a person lose their livelihood because someone took their horrible pun the wrong way?
Suspension? Sure. Firing? I don't get it.
Oh yea. Totally see how they're similar things. lolAbout the Islam thing...it's like this. Imagine if you saw in the background of the Guile level in SF2, a woman dressed like the statue of liberty fellating a man dressed like Uncle Sam? Some people would be offended by that....<snip...>
So, Islamic cultures are like that with portrayals of their Holy icons.
On the flipside for example calling someone fat or ugly isn't offensive(in many parts of Asia), it's telling the truth. Different standards.You're probably right, but fucking hell, you're trying really fucking hard if that offends you. His name, in pixellated, barely legible form, written on the floor of a fictional arena, in a piece of software. You need to just let some of 'em go, surely!
Not really, that's where the culture part play in. For people in the middle east putting a picture of the word Allah in the bathroom is blatantly offensive. So is standing on one. America is not the center of the world and doesn't dictate the standards for other parts of the world.
So you would be offended if it was someone who knew her. Well there you go.
You're probably right, but fucking hell, you're trying really fucking hard if that offends you. His name, in pixellated, barely legible form, written on the floor of a fictional arena, in a piece of software. You need to just let some of 'em go, surely!
Well being offended is a broad term. That's what makes that Stephen Fry quote so damn stupid.That's just plain insulting someone, that's not the same as being offended.
Succinctly put my man. That's usually the case, "OK, I get you, you thought that was in bad taste. But not only are you going to kick up a stink, rather than turn the other cheek, but demand action be taken to appease your sensibilities."It's ok to be offended. Just don't expect everyone to care.
That's just plain insulting someone, that's not the same as being offended.
This isn't, in any way, shape or form, intended to offend or bait anyone. Please post respectfully and thoughtfully.
I've noticed in the last couple of years, that the term "offensive" gets thrown around more and more often, sometimes entirely inappropriately. It seems that if something is even remotely offensive these days, it must be banished immediately, without hesitation. Now obviously, when it comes to race, sexual orientation, religion, etc, you need to conduct yourself with poise and respect. But it seems the mere mention of something regarding someone's religion nowadays is considered offensive.
I'll preface by saying, I am not at all informed about Muslim culture, and therefore have no frame of reference, so I apologise in advance if I offend anyone or miss the point entirely, but two recent issues seemed to be particularly innocuous. The painting on the Modern Warfare 2 map that had the Holy teachings: "Allah is beautiful and He loves beauty." written round the frame. Now I don't see where the offence comes from? Is it simply the mere mention of his name outside of prayer? It seems to me that it's a positive message, and should be embraced, not removed. And recently, the Tekken Tag Tournament 2 stage with the Arabic script for Allah etched on the floor. Again, where does the offence come from? In both these instances, the "offending" items where requested to be removed.
Now if these incidents had their deities name taken in vain, then it would be entirely understandable. But it seems, to the uninformed such as my self, that they are being blown out of proportion. Again, if I've missed the point, and it actually is horribly offensive, then I apologize. I'm eager to find out more. Also, I'll just leave this here:
![]()
I'm really indifferent on the matter but this reminds me of something:
I remember when poster OttomanScribe gave the perfect example of showing how this quote by Stephen Fry doesn't really work 100% of the time.
http://64.91.233.250/forum/showthread.php?t=489016
I couldn't care less if it's removed or not, it's more the immediate, kneejerk reaction to remove. Why not just issue a statement, "sorry, no intent to offend". Done.I don't think you understand how religion works, to a Muslim that is hugely offensive(also given that it was unintentional & Harada seemed to have no issue removing it, it strikes me as very interesting to see all the complaints about its removal, given that no artistic integrity has been compromised, it's almost as if any chance to complain about Muslims is jumped on).
Just because you don't understand why someone finds X, Y or Z offensive doesn't mean their offence is any lesser or illegitimate. Should Muslims have to take Ninjabox's interpretation on something he admittedly has no understanding of before they can form an opinion? The mere fact that you have no idea arguably renders your opinion quite irrelevant. Talking about this generally, why should it be okay to offend someone? Why can't a man walk on the street and have the right not to confronted with insult? Equally as curious, why should it be acceptable to insult someone?
Well now you can check if you have empathy to your fellow man and understand why someone could be offended.Ottomans example doesn't offend me.
Now what?
A common soundbyte here is how having first-amendment rights protects you from other people being offended at what you say. What?
The fact that I work in an office building in the deep south is probably relevant to this, but I hear every week about how stupid it is for people to be offended, and never(I can recall one specific incident, after which the offendee was temporarily ostracized) actually hear someone talking about being offended about something. At least speaking from a local anecdotal perspective, I think this anti-PR pendulum has swung so far in the opposite direction that people ironically get extremely offended about people being offended about something.
A common soundbyte here is how having first-amendment rights protects you from other people being offended at what you say. What?
I couldn't care less if it's removed or not, it's more the immediate, kneejerk reaction to remove. Why not just issue a statement, "sorry, no intent to offend". Done.
But I hear what you're saying, it's an entirely different culture, and most of us have no frame of reference.
Ottomans example doesn't offend me.
Now what?
Fair point.That's what they did say, then they removed it out of respect.
An issue was brought up in a civilised manner, and responded to in an equally polite way. Good.
I couldn't care less if it's removed or not, it's more the immediate, kneejerk reaction to remove. Why not just issue a statement, "sorry, no intent to offend". Done.
But I hear what you're saying, it's an entirely different culture, and most of us have no frame of reference.
Truth is, you can't walk down the street and not be offended. You can find offense in anything if you look hard enough, which some people, sadly enough, do all the time.
Fair point.
Can someone post this brilliant OttomanScribe post? All I see is him saying, "offence is sometimes justified." I was hoping for some witty, cutting rebuttal.
I couldn't care less if it's removed or not, it's more the immediate, kneejerk reaction to remove. Why not just issue a statement, "sorry, no intent to offend". Done.
But I hear what you're saying, it's an entirely different culture, and most of us have no frame of reference.
I can't believe people actually think that that's a good argument. Everyone can be offended, but it's the feeling of people that they have extra rights because of it that he's denouncing. The point is going straight over your head. Banning people on a forum because of speech that goes counter to productive discussion and communication is something entirely different to banning people on a forum because you're offended by their statements. It has also nothing to do with free speech in general.Wow. I can't believe his post went directly over that many people's heads, even after thoroughly explaining it multiple times. Hilarious.
He called Stephen Fry a faggot. People on Gaf got offended.
Why without emotional reaction? Any reaction within the boundaries of the law (or more important, morality) is alright. It's the forceful silencing, boundaries set by the law on free speech that are the issue, which has nothing to do with any 'reaction' to free speech, your 'emotional reaction' is just as well free speech.Huh, I expected something very different from the title. Almost the exact opposite actually. Because I think we've gone a bit too far in the other direction where its not okay to be offended because you don't have a right to find anything offensive, that you just have to accept literally everything everyone else says without emotional reaction.
I don't think you understand how religion works, to a Muslim that is hugely offensive(also given that it was unintentional & Harada seemed to have no issue removing it, it strikes me as very interesting to see all the complaints about its removal, given that no artistic integrity has been compromised, it's almost as if any chance to complain about Muslims is jumped on).
Same is true for the Stephen Fry picture. I think the awesome thing about Scribe's response was that it brought out the hypocrisy.
As a gay man I don't get offended by anti-gay remarks. I get pissed off by the disrespect and then make sure that the party involved is set straight, pardon the pun.