She certainly is hot.Raydeen said:Great blend of sci-fi and horror. And Mellisa George, which is never a bad thing.
She certainly is hot.Raydeen said:Great blend of sci-fi and horror. And Mellisa George, which is never a bad thing.
I haven't missed most of those because everything people are posting is stuff I watched 10 years ago. Which kinda proves my point.TacticalFox88 said:So, OP....with all these films we're pulling.....how in the FUCK could you have missed some of these?
Rife with plot holes.teruterubozu said:Yeah, Triangle's actually not bad, for an instant streaming selection. Although I would call it straight-up horror.
The twist was terrible. But we were still gifted with amazing sequences like the ending or Capa's Jump. It still is one of the best Sci Fi films you can watch even with it._dementia said:The last third of the film blows ass
W... what?genjiZERO said:Star Trek is good, but it's not quite serious enough for me.
ianp622 said:Dark City was pretty meh in my opinion. Would have been better without the scifi part.
I came into this thread just to see if Sleep Dealer was mentioned. One of my all time favorites. Will check out the rest you mentioned, thanks.Ducarmel said:Code46
http://i25.tinypic.com/2my0sm.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0KVJZqpzHA
Impostor
http://i26.tinypic.com/2qb5h7n.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H_P4xVUvv8
Renaissance
http://i29.tinypic.com/2q9dvmv.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh7s32XRScQ
Paranoia: 1.0 (originally One Point O, also known as 1.0, One Point Zero, Version 1.0, and Virus 1.0)
http://i28.tinypic.com/vddc7c.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw3V_VnRoaA
Puzzlehead
http://i31.tinypic.com/5n6hd0.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXTDP7S4EE4
Control
http://i31.tinypic.com/24pfoya.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eltedBOkjTo
Sleep Dealer
![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW8oSRSzS7M
INK
http://i.imgur.com/A0BN5.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBGeErufQdY
Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence
http://i.imgur.com/xaM8W.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCpcB2RjiM
Frequency
http://l.yimg.com/eb/ymv/us/img/hv/allposters/10/1800353910p.jpg
elrechazao said:If you mean most contrived after the fact to explain horrendous shit like floating mountains, then yes.
a176 said:where is cloverfield love
![]()
Qwomo said:W... what?
Star Trek is extremely serious.
Do you think I'm talking about the 2009 movie?
AlkalineSolo said:
This says it allThagomizer said:![]()
God dammnit I would have been first if it wasn't for the 60 second gate
I just finished watching it, great movie. I would call it sci-fantasy.OuterWorldVoice said:The Fountain is not sci-fi. It is literally fantasy. Although it contains sci-fi imagery and is awesome.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it in 3D or whatever, but I didn't think there was anything "breathtaking" about it. It's a dull earth-esque environment where things will glow if you step on them, and it cost several millions to make. Give Terrence Mallick or Werner Herzog a handheld camera and they'll produce more breathtaking "alien" imagery than anything Cameron generated for Avatar. It's not Blade Runner, it's not Alien, it's not 2001, it's dull and uninspired, just like the plot, the music, the themes and the characters in that movie.nitewulf said:its a cheesy love story and very predictable. i mean nothing surprising happens in that movie, pretty by the numbers...its breathtaking and all that, and fine if you enjoy it, but its not....good.
Danne-Danger said:Maybe it's because I didn't see it in 3D or whatever, but I didn't think there was anything "breathtaking" about it. It's a dull earth-esque environment where things will glow if you step on them, and it cost several millions to make. Give Terrence Mallick or Werner Herzog a handheld camera and they'll produce more breathtaking "alien" imagery than anything Cameron generated for Avatar. It's not Blade Runner, it's not Alien, it's not 2001, it's dull and uninspired, just like the plot, the music, the themes and the characters in that movie.