Yeah, seriously. It blows my mind Americans here have such a hard time understanding how people who grew up abroad could have such different cultural points of reference (pop culture included) and worldviews. Had to google him back in 2011 when Obama mentioned him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. By that time I had already been several times to the US for long stays, which is more than most people from where I come from can say.I don't get all these people saying that Pac was unknown outside the US. Seriously?!
There are probably thousands of Nirvana covers out there, whereas people really don't cover Tupac. I know it's not a thing to cover rap songs, but Nirvana certainly gets more airplay in various forms (even jazz).
Exactly.it's not a thing to cover rap songs.
On-Topic:
'Pac's death lead to Biggie's death. Both of them had a major impact on the direction of rap and hip-hop.
Kurt's genre died without him.
Take that for what you will.
Yeah, seriously. It blows my mind Americans here have such a hard time understanding how people who grew up abroad could have such different cultural points of reference (pop culture included) and worldviews. Had to google him back in 2011 when Obama mentioned him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. By that time I had already been several times to the US for long stays, which is more than most people from where I come from can say.
In contrast, feels like I've always known Cobain. Anyone you ask, they'll know him. Tupac? Expect only the most knowledgeable people on the American musical landscape to know him,
You seem to have the same issue. Tupac is very popular in Africa and the Middle East, for instance. NPR even did an article on his influence on the Arab Spring. They even made a film about Tupac in China.
On the one hand, Kurt Combain essentially killed rock music and it's still dead to this day. Oh sure, people still make it, but it's not the big commercial force or cultural thing it once was. .
What about Selena?
I don't believe you (just on the bolded though, everything else I agree with it at least can see).Tupac is a nobody outside of the United States. If you were to ask a crowd of regular people here in The Netherlands about Tupac, the most you'd get is that he's 'some rapper who got killed'. On the other hand, everyone knows who Kurt Cobain is and how he died.
Yeah sure, if you'd ask music lovers about Tupac you'd probably get a more refined answer, but he's not nearly as famous as Kurt Cobain/Nirvana.
I remember about 10 years ago trying to rep Tupac to some friends from India. They'd never heard of him. For a lot of people internationally, rap started with Eminem they knew of Dre and 50, but only thanks to Em.I don't believe you.
Kurt's was a hundred times more impactful in 99% of the world. Most people outside the US have never even listened to Tupac's work.
This is what I was thinking as well. I'd go as far to say that places like northern Europe hadn't really been exposed that much to the African-American culture aside from the Cosby show and Eddie Murphy in the early 90's aside from maybe the big cities. And I'm exaggerating of course as there were a lot of successful hip hop groups (N.W.A. etc.) that got through, but they were still a niche in terms of media exposure.
For someone who just spent a good deal of effort trying to combat ignorance, it's a shame you followed it with such an ignorant statement of your own.
Yeah, I was talking about the general population. Most of my friends know Tupac of course, since we're pretty big into rap, but ask people on the streets and you'd probably get almost nothing. The American rappers people know of are Eminem, 50 Cent, Drake, Snoop Dogg and Kanye West (more for his media personality than his music though). The rest is simply not widely known in Dutch circles. It's all about the (absolutely awful) Dutch rappers.I remember about 10 years ago trying to rep Tupac to some friends from India. They'd never heard of him. For a lot of people internationally, rap started with Eminem they knew of Dre and 50, but only thanks to Em.
But I think the people trying to say Tupac is completely unknown internationally are like the same people who'd try to argue he's unknown in North America compared with Cobain. It's actually highly subjective related to your peer group.
If you resonate with a gangster, street mindset anywhere in the world, I'm sure you have heard of Tupac first. And if you're all about guitar-based genres (pssst White people in Europe), Cobain probably occupies more mindshare.
Are you actually serious? The so-called 'death of rock' is far more recent than Cobain's suicide. Hugely popular bands like Linkin Park, Muse, Foo Fighters, etc. all came after Nirvana.On the one hand, Kurt Combain essentially killed rock music and it's still dead to this day. Oh sure, people still make it, but it's not the big commercial force or cultural thing it once was.
This is like those threads where Americans assume that LeBron is more significant than Messi because reasons.
Kurt Cobain is still a worlwide icon so him i guess.
How? Both of these people are Americans performing in American musical genres.
You're saying that when All Eyes on Me is about to come out.I'd say Kurt. Nirvana is still played and referenced to this day. Tupac is really only mentioned for the circumstances of his death it seems.
Grunge had more international appeal than rap did at the time, even if that's no longer the case. The average non-American might have been able to name Tupac as that rapper who got killed, but I'd be surprised if more than a fraction could name any tracks. Everyone knew Nirvana - even if you didn't like them and that wasn't your thing (common in the UK which went Britpop), you still knew the name and knew the tracks.
I prefer rap to grunge and I listen to Tupac more than I do Nirvana, but being alive at the time, I know which impacted the popular consensus more.
Grunge didn't make it out of the 90s.
But the question isn't "Who was more well known at the time of their death"
Yeah, I was talking about the general population. Most of my friends know Tupac of course, since we're pretty big into rap, but ask people on the streets and you'd probably get almost nothing. The American rappers people know of are Eminem, 50 Cent, Drake, Snoop Dogg and Kanye West (more for his media personality than his music though). The rest is simply not widely known in Dutch circles. It's all about the (absolutely awful) Dutch rappers.
I'm not sure it has to do with race that much though, I think it's more that in comparison with other music genres, rap is more focused on themes that are more culturally exclusive than rock music. Tupac for instance talked a lot about growing up in America an inequality for black people, that kind of stuff just doesn't translate at all to most European cultures, so instead of sticking around those kind of songs kinda become a flash in the pan. According to Wikipedia, Tupac's stuff did really well in thev Dutch charts when they were released, but disappeared just as quickly afterwards.
On the other hand, really popular Dutch rappers who rap about domestic "issues" stay in the spotlight even if they don't really make a hit again. Everybody here remembers two hit wonders like "Lange Frans & Baas B." because one time they rapped about random acts of senseless violence in Amsterdam.
Are you actually serious? The so-called 'death of rock' is far more recent than Cobain's suicide. Hugely popular bands like Linkin Park, Muse, Foo Fighters, etc. all came after Nirvana.
"Kurt Cobain seems to be referenced more than Tupac"
Only because "Tupac is still alive" is a thing.
For perspective, if your reading of the situation is true, then, directly or indirectly, 'Pac is almost certainly responsible for the international appeal rap currently enjoys.
Surely that is directly relevant to their impact? A lesser known person cannot have the greater impact?
It's hard to say what "impact" actually is but considering that rock music is on a bit of a downswing these days in terms of mainstream influence I'd probably say Tupac has been musically more impactful