How anyone could sincerely believe Skyrim it's dull or repetitive is beyond me.
I haven't tried Dark Souls
I played other RPGs before. That's how.How anyone could sincerely believe it's dull or repetitive is beyond me.
Do you actually want to see stuff, like beautiful scenery, towns, caves, etc? Go explore, and make your own adventure?Do you want to play an amazing game or Skyrim?
Just remember, the game is at its most difficult early on. Stick with it and learn the game and you'll be rewarded in spades.You may have convinced me to get the game.![]()
I see what you're getting at, but I think it's fair to say without reference to other games that Skyrim has tons of variety to offer unless the player insists on sticking to the most conventional path. Whether or not Dark Souls ends up blowing my mind, I'll still remember and value my 100+ hours with Skyrim.There is your answer. Play Dark Souls and come back here, I'd love to read about your journey.
Strangely enough, so have I.I played other RPGs before. That's how.
If you want to stare at pretty vistas, play Skyrim. If you want good gameplay and something that will keep you coming back wanting more, play Dark Souls.
No, not really. No if they don't offer anything interesting gameplay-wise.Do you actually want to see stuff, like beautiful scenery, towns, caves, etc? Go explore, and make your own adventure?
No, not really. No if they don't offer anything interesting gameplay-wise.
The effect doesn't work on everyone, in fact it scares more people off than it impresses.
Exploration is gameplay.
I honestly flsont see what is so impressive about DS. It's well put together and everything, but it's not like it's technically astounding, or doing anything particularly new.The effect doesn't work on everyone, in fact it scares more people off than it impresses.
What about a game that offers interesting gameplay, but in really dull, dark locales. And that is challenging enough, that you regularly lose hours of progress?No, not really. No if they don't offer anything interesting gameplay-wise.
There is your answer. Play Dark Souls and come back here, I'd love to read about your journey.
This makes no sense.
Playing DS doesn't suddenly make you think Skyrim is repetitve or dull.
No, exploration is part of the gameplay when it includes, you know, game mechanics tied in.Exploration is gameplay.
No, exploration is part of the gameplay when it includes, you know, game mechanics tied in.
When you have vertical building, a bit platforming, obstacles to consider/avoid, "gatekeepers" to pass and so on.
When it's just walking around in a (mostly) flat landscape or in a bunch of corridors without anything you can cross being of any influence to your experience, it's not gameplay, it's just background.
I honestly flsont see what is so impressive about DS. It's well put together and everything, but it's not like it's technically astounding, or doing anything particularly new.
The main draw, is how challenging it is.
But I don't know about anyone else, but I'd rather see new content, than have to retread the same tired areas over and over. And then lose all your progress because your concentration lapsed for a few seconds, and be back to square one.
Urgh, it's just too much work. I honestly don't see how people enjoy it, it's just a laborious trudge, a war of attrition. And no amount of nice art, and decent design can change that for me.
Wow, you tried really hard to paint the exploration in Skyrim as dull and restrictive and as opposed to Dark Souls of all things! I'm not saying DS has no exploration, but to say Skyrim is an inferior world to explore, just, what? DS literally is a series of connected corridors. It's certainly a lot more linear than Skyrim.No, exploration is part of the gameplay when it includes, you know, game mechanics tied in.
When you have vertical building, a bit of platforming, obstacles to consider/avoid, "gatekeepers" to pass, secrets to find and so on.
When it's just walking around in a (mostly) flat landscape or in a bunch of corridors without anything you can cross being of any influence to your experience, it's not gameplay, it's just background.
Compare Dark Souls, Gothic or Risen to Skyrim to get the idea.
Hell, actually even a *literally* flat world like the one seen in the 20 years old Ultima VII/Serpent Isle puts the "explorative gameplay" in Skyrim in shame.
No, I actually tried very hard to enjoy it, but I just couldn't because it *is* dull.Wow, you tried really hard to paint the exploration in Skyrim as dull
Yeah, and I would state it again: it is an inferior world to explore.but to say Skyrim is an inferior world to explore, just, what?
More specifically, DS is a series of *cleverly* connected corridors, with a good amount of optional stuff (secret passages, secret loot, optional areas even) that requires an active effort to be found.DS literally is a series of connected corridors. It's certainly a lot more linear than Skyrim.
Nailed it.dab0ne said:In Skyrim I felt free, in Demon's Souls I felt confined.
No, exploration is part of the gameplay when it includes, you know, game mechanics tied in.
When you have vertical building, a bit of platforming, obstacles to consider/avoid, "gatekeepers" to pass, secrets to find and so on.
When it's just walking around in a (mostly) flat landscape or in a bunch of corridors without anything you can cross being of any influence to your experience, it's not gameplay, it's just background.
Compare Dark Souls, Gothic or Risen to Skyrim to get the idea.
Hell, actually even a *literally* flat world like the one seen in the 20 years old Ultima VII/Serpent Isle puts the "explorative gameplay" in Skyrim in shame.
That's exactly my problem with it, because despise that, it still doesn't do it well.And yet the exploration is the main draw of the game to me. Taking in the environment, music, lore, and discovering locations.
It depends on the person playing, really. Many, like myself, find Dark Souls to be a better game, and yes, I do find Skyrim to be a bit repetitive.
I can't count the number of times I literally fell asleep like 20 minutes into a Skyrim session.
And that's exactly my problem with it, because despise than it still doesn't do it well.
not compared to an abstract, absurd ideal of perfection, but compared to plenty of other games around.
If you like challenging games, with really tight controls, and a well designed, if slightly dull and lifeless world, get DS.
If you like piss easy games, with questionable combat, slightly dodgy controls, but a huge, beautiful and interesting world, play Skyrim.
Go to a doctor then, because that's not normal.
The world in DS is just small, dark and cramped. There isn't really any exploration to speak of. There are paths where you can walk, or pits/lava/whatever where you can die, that's pretty much it.I'd say this is true, except you're combining pretty objective points about challenge and control with much more subjective ones like whether the lore/world is interesting. Dark Souls, without a doubt, has the world I most enjoyed this generation. Maybe dark fantasy just isn't your thing. Nothing wrong with that. There's a lot of lore and detail for anyone who wants to get into it.
Yeah, I just don't think there is ANY truth in your claim.Not really. No other game offers good exploration with comparable freedom or scope aside from the Fallouts.
To discover WHAT? There's nothing in Skyrim worthy of being discovered, which is exactly its main issue.Skyrim actually feels like a huge place to go and discover.
I think he's just trying to argue on your level.Yeah, I just don't think there is ANY truth in your claim.
Again, as opposed to the fully interactive environments of DS? It's even more linear and static, and has far less to find.To discover WHAT? There's nothing in Skyrim worthy of being discovered, which is exactly its main issue.
Of course, unless you are just fine with looking at pretty scenarios, regardless of how dull it is to interact with them.
Wait, are you trying to suggest I should feel bad just because I know better?I think he's just trying to argue on your level.
I already answered to this, are you reading my replies at all?Again, as opposed to the fully interactive environments of DS?
To discover WHAT? There's nothing in Skyrim worthy of being discovered, which is exactly its main issue.
Of course, unless you are just fine with looking at pretty scenarios, regardless of how dull it is to interact with them.
When I want that, I usually watch (again) at BBC Planet Earth, I don't play games.
That's cool. But when you're arguing every one of your utterances as an undeniable fact, don't gawk when someone else starts doing the same.Wait, are you trying to suggest I should feel bad just because I know better?
Because that's the point. I'm not shitting on Skyrim because I want to hate it.
Actually, I would like to love it. I just can't because i played too many better games to be fine with what it offers. I also already named a few of them.
The world in DS is just small, dark and cramped. There isn't really any exploration to speak of. There are paths where you can walk, or pits/lava/whatever where you can die, that's pretty much it.
Seriously, objectively speaking, I don't know how anyone can find DS more interesting to explore than Skyrim. There is nothing there! It's nicely textured paths, that's it. Skyrim actually feels like a huge place to go and discover.
I would at least expect to hear "claimed facts" grounded in reality.That's cool. But when you're arguing every one of your utterances as an undeniable fact, don't gawk when someone else starts doing the same.