It has a lot to do with the prevalence of minorities in America. There are so many voices from so many different cultures and backgrounds that for it to work, people in America have to be more accepting. Adding to that, with so many voices, people are able to understand and empathize with different cultures than people do in Europe.
Having said that I think Europe is a fucking paradise when it comes to liberal politics. I just wish they would stop wearing black face over there as, "tradition."
I am from Europe and I am not racist.
Like I'm just going to believe some racist when he says he isn't one.I am from Europe and I am not racist.
QED
Thats the Netherlands. Europe is not a country.
Man I wish. I've been here legally for 19 years and they still won't give me my citizenship. About a decade ago my grandfather said fuck it and moved to Spain where he and his wife got citizenship in like two years.![]()
It's kinda the same way to talk about the United States and Canada as a whole. Oregon is not Quebec is not Alabama is not Maine.Yeah. Threads like this don't make any sense most of the time. Speaking about Europe like that is pretty much like speaking about the entire American continent as being one country. There are large differences between all the countries that make up Europe.
wait this changes everything
Like I'm just going to believe some racist when he says he isn't one.
I wouldn't say that Europeans are more racist. What I would say is that anglosphere countries like America, The UK, Canada and NZ have a civic conception of nationhood and not an ethnic conception of nationhood.
It's obviously not an absolute statement and elements of both exist within all cultures but in most Anglosphere countries, the civic conception wins out. If someone comes to an anglosphere country and accepts their values they will be accepted as a member of that society. It's probably why America, Canada, The UK, NZ and Australia have been so successful with migration populations.
The civic conception of nationhood really is something unique to the Anglosphere. It's not something that I've really seen in other cultures.
I don't know, a country like Singapore challenges the notion only white/Anglo countries can build a nation with a common nationality instead of an ethnicity. Also remember, those Anglo nations had the benefit of industrialization and colonization.
It's kinda the same way to talk about the United States and Canada as a whole. Oregon is not Quebec is not Alabama is not Maine.
Is it easier for the Indian and Chinese student to come to the US, study, work, live and be accepted, or is it easier for them to go to Switzerland and do the same?
I don't disagree but just trying to discern the "culture" of the U.S. by looking at either San Francisco or Mobile, Alabama has many of the same problems as trying to asses Europe via Paris or Prague.It's even worse. The US and Canada at least share the same language (bar Québec).
Birds will follow roads and walls in flight, so clearly we need to build massive walls around all nations so that birds will recognize our differences.guys when birds look down they don't see borders all they see are people think about it all we are is people all of us isn't it beautiful
I don't disagree but just trying to discern the "culture" of the U.S. by looking at either San Francisco or Mobile, Alabama has many of the same problems as trying to asses Europe via Paris or Prague.
I don't disagree but just trying to discern the "culture" of the U.S. by looking at either San Francisco or Mobile, Alabama has many of the same problems as trying to asses Europe via Paris or Prague.
Birds will follow roads and walls in flight, so clearly we need to build massive walls around all nations so that birds will recognize our differences.
Having said that I think Europe is a fucking paradise when it comes to liberal politics. I just wish they would stop wearing black face over there as, "tradition."
Violating our air space constantly and what do we do? NOTHING! WE EVEN GIVE THEM HANDOUTS!We cannot allow such brazen mockery of national and state boundaries.
It's kinda the same way to talk about the United States and Canada as a whole. Oregon is not Quebec is not Alabama is not Maine.
No. When birds look down all they see is toilet, toilet as far as the eye can see.guys when birds look down they don't see borders all they see are people think about it all we are is people all of us isn't it beautiful
Sternsinger. Then again, stopping that would be actually racist, so...Thats the Netherlands. Europe is not a country.
I already acknowledged the differences that Arksy intelligently pointed out, but to take any single cultural factor from West Virginia and apply it as "American culture" is no different than ascribing Zwarte Piet to all of Europe.It's not like that at all.
Thats the Netherlands. Europe is not a country.
It's not acceptable in the US because it was used to mock blacks over there. We had no black slaves or racial segregation. Different perspective.A family member lives in Ireland, and while it's not tradition over there, it's acceptable for people to wear blackface as well.
Well for a start you're comparing a nation to a continent so you're doomed to fail.Is it just the varying degrees of the multitude of Euro cultures or are Euros just more naturally bigoted than Americans?
In Europe?We had no ... racial segregation.
It's not acceptable in the US because it was used to mock blacks over there. We had no black slaves or racial segregation. Different perspective.
Yep.In Europe?
Now you know. And I'm really not sure what past Irish-English relationships are supposed to have to do with anything. Blackface per se is no symbol for slavery.I don't know about that.
And even if Ireland didn't have black slaves, there could be many arguments made that the Irish were slaves to the English in some capacity for a very long time. It'd be difficult to justify wearing blackface given those circumstances as well as understanding the meaning of blackface after Birth of a Nation.
It's not acceptable in the US because it was used to mock blacks over there. We had no black slaves or racial segregation. Different perspective.
im interested in why seemingly every US white person claims native american ancestry. Is it like a Turbo Tax thing or something?
Jews are not a race. That was also only a short era in a single country, though religious segregation was a thing in many European countries over centuries.
No. They're in poor areas.I mean, in the US aren't all of your awful schools in 'black areas'?
You can kill white people in self defense too, yes. And asians and robots and anybody but police really.You can also kill black kids in self defense and get away with it, you can't with white kids, can you?
There's lots of whites abused too, it's not a racism thing as much as it's a serfs and lords thing.I've also seen a lot of videos of American police abusing black people.
Really? No racial and ethnic segregation ever in all of Europe huh?Yep.
Come on, son.That was also only a short era in a single country
Now you know. And I'm really not sure what past Irish-English relationships are supposed to have to do with anything. Blackface per se is no symbol for slavery.
No. They're in poor areas.
http://www.humanityinaction.org/kno...netherlands-segregation-in-a-tolerant-society
You can kill white people in self defense too, yes. And asians and robots and anybody but police really.
There's lots of whites abused too, it's not a racism thing as much as it's a serfs and lords thing.
The disproportionate impact of the War on Drugs and War on Poverty on blacks is more due to their being given a bad hand to start with not out of the state's intentions.
Really? No racial and ethnic segregation ever in all of Europe huh?
Come on, son.
N
Really? No racial and ethnic segregation ever in all of Europe huh?
Come on, son.
It's kinda the same way to talk about the United States and Canada as a whole. Oregon is not Quebec is not Alabama is not Maine.
I think the existence of ethnic political parties is one place to start.Whether it's the case nowadays, that's hard to tell without resorting to anecdotal evidence.
I don't know about that.
And even if Ireland didn't have black slaves, there could be many arguments made that the Irish were slaves to the English in some capacity for a very long time. It'd be difficult to justify wearing blackface given those circumstances as well as understanding the meaning of blackface after Birth of a Nation.
Is it just the varying degrees of the multitude of Euro cultures or are Euros just more naturally bigoted than Americans?