CrushDance said:
:lol Samsung makes cheap products!????
Comparatively, yes. They make products that, at a glance, look like high end equipment, and their specs on paper may look high-end. They're even very good at adopting new technologies before other manufacturers, but they do not make high end equipment.
I couldn't believe how cheap their LE52M87 looked when I had it delivered. (at the time, it was their flagship television) The "piano black" finish had warped reflections all over it which looked ridiculously cheap, and the stand let the TV wobble about as soon as anyone entered the room. Build quality seemed poor as well. It may have been expensive, but everything about it looked and felt cheap.
Its specifications should have put it at the top of its class for LCD; the resulting image was anything but - it used the same image processing as sets far cheaper than it, which looked awful at that size.
On a few UK forums, around the time when the 360 launched, a lot of people were buying the LE__R41/51 models as they were the ones Microsoft was using with their displays. A large number of those had various faults, with many dying within a year. I was without a television for months as a result of mine going faulty, and when it was finally returned to me from the Samsung repair centre, it literally went up in smoke when I plugged it in. I was then offered a refund without any hassle at all the next day. (I had been phoning up numerous times as I had been promised a temporary TV which never turned up and the repair took far longer than it should have)
I know plenty of people that have bought Samsung phones - they might look the part until you get up close, but they're flimsy and every single one of them has had problems within a year.
They are a marginal step above "no-name" brand products, but nothing more in my opinion. At least, that has been my experience with them.