brisk tacos
Banned
Man, Off-Topic has been depressing as fuck recently.
RIP Gaborn
Man, Off-Topic has been depressing as fuck recently.
Wasn't the problem in this case that someone who helps could end up getting sued? But not sure I remember that right.Possible NSFW.
It's a YouTube video showing the kid being ran over. And no one helping.
Yet even when a driver hits a victim multiple times, it can be hard to prove intent and causationat least to the satisfaction of Chinas courts.
I think this has less to do with car culture and money and more to do with individual lives mean nothing when the population of the country hits a billion. See also: Egregiously terrible behavior in India.
I love how people think this is some type of special case where it only happens in China.
This situation is probably far more common than you think in many other situations. Just think of a home invasion, what if you injure someone who was "fleeing" with your weapon and now you're stuck in a court case, simple "solution" (and I use these words very mildly) is to kill them instead of letting them walk and become a huge liability.
"Nearly all", really? I can't speak for China, but this assertion about Japan is absurd. Where on earth did you get this idea?
fyi, I think you're not supposed to put links in spoilersPossible NSFW.
It's a YouTube video showing the kid being ran over. And no one helping.
"Nearly all", really? I can't speak for China, but this assertion about Japan is absurd. Where on earth did you get this idea?
TOKYO Photos of the teenager's corpse show a deep cut on his right arm, horrific bruising on his neck and chest. His face is swollen and covered with cuts. A silhouette of violence runs from the corner of his left eye over the cheekbone to his jaw, and his legs are pocked with small burns the size of a lighted cigarette.
But police in Japan's Aichi prefecture saw something else when they looked at the body of Takashi Saito, a 17-year-old sumo wrestler who arrived at a hospital in June. The cause of death was "heart disease," police declared.
As is common in Japan, Aichi police reached their verdict on how Saito died without an autopsy. No need for a coroner, they said. No crime involved. Only 6.3% of the unnatural deaths in Aichi are investigated by a medical examiner, a minuscule rate even by nationwide standards in Japan, where an autopsy is performed in 11.2% of cases.
Wasn't the problem in this case that someone who helps could end up getting sued? But not sure I remember that right.
Found an old article about itWhy in the world would that be the case?
The clip has revived the debate on whether bystanders should help accident victims.
The Chinese courts set a precedent in 2006 when a young adult trying to help an elderly woman who fell was sued for $6,076.
According to Bloomberg, two separate polls in China determined that the majority of bystanders would NOT help an accident victim.
Since then, the issue of whether or not bystanders should help victims has been under heated debate. And many victims have not received potentially life-saving help for fear of lawsuits.
The Global Times in China has highlighted a number of similar accidents where the victims received no assistance from bystanders. In one incident, the victim only received aid after saying "I fell down myself. You don't need to worry, it's nothing to do with you."
Found an old article about it
http://www.businessinsider.com/two-year-old-hit-by-car-in-china-2011-10?IR=T
Found an old article about it
http://www.businessinsider.com/two-year-old-hit-by-car-in-china-2011-10?IR=T
Without any surveillance video and witnesses, Xu was convicted and assigned 40 percent responsibility for the accident, even though the court never determined that he hit Wang. He was ordered to pay over 100,000 yuan ($15,632) in compensation to Wang, according to the original judgment handed down by a district court in June. Xu appealed the ruling, insisting he was innocent.
It's not an isolated case either, there are many cases where the innocence of the accused was maintained only after checking surveillance videos. A lot of these old people has no morals, themselves growing out of the cultural revolution.
I love my country but these are certainly embarrassing. I personally have never seen issues in driving or in the streets but ten again I have only lived in first tier cities. Shanghai is generally very safe for example![]()
Scooter drivers are the worst. Can't stand those ignorant fuckers "what's a traffic light and how does it work?"
... what kind of piece of shit do you have to be to do something like that and then make an economic decision, "shit, it's going to cost me more if I don't kill them." -REVERSE-
My law professor used to joke that the most useful thing he'd ever teach us is that it'd be preferable to kill a guy in a crash since it'd be cheaper. I never knew some people actually did it though.
Damn you've been here what, a week? You sound so angry already haha.
The cars arent really a problem but those e-bikes or small scooters are. While the drivers of cars generally drive like shit, it is still okay if you are careful. But those scooter drivers dont even have a licence, often dont use mirrors and act like they own the street. They dont care about red lights and drive whenever they want. Whenever I drive here with my car (Beijing) I am super careful about those.
I'm wary of any story that tries to make the Chinese people out to be heartless monsters.
Damn you've been here what, a week? You sound so angry already haha.
Possible NSFW.
https://youtu.be/3Db6kYuBq_Y
It's a YouTube video showing the kid being ran over. And no one helping.
... what kind of piece of shit do you have to be to do something like that and then make an economic decision, "shit, it's going to cost me more if I don't kill them." -REVERSE-
Things like this and Tianjin make me guess all the people who say China is a libertarian nightmare experiment are onto something
Indeed, Zhao Xiao Chengthe man caught on a security camera video driving over a grandmother five timesended up paying only about $70,000 in compensation.
Its not uncommon for drivers involved in accidents, especially those in which they cause damage to other pedestrians or property, to panic and attempt to extricate their vehicles, thereby causing much more damage than the initial collisions did.
Read more at http://m.snopes.com/chinese-drivers-kill-pedestrians/#oGRdbT7J5jMiUexb.99
The Slate article cited six instances of purportedly deliberate vehicular killings captured on video, at least two of which were apparently either misrepresented or unsupported by citation. As well, even the viewable videos didnt demonstrably depict heartless drivers murdering pedestrians solely to avoid hefty legal damages: viewers could only discern that they chronicled incidents of drivers striking pedestrians multiple times during the same accident, for reasons that could only be assumed or guessed. And even if the incidents depicted were proven to represent what was claimed in the Slate article, they would constitute six examples taking place over roughly the span of a decade, or less than one per year in a country with a population of 1.4 billion people hardly what one would categorize as a common phenomenon.
Read more at http://m.snopes.com/chinese-drivers-kill-pedestrians/#oGRdbT7J5jMiUexb.99
I'm wary of any story that tries to make the Chinese people out to be heartless monsters.