Well I'm looking at it only from my perspective. If someone dosen't have a PS3 or PS4 then sure I guess the library is good for them. I do and so the Vita does not actually offer me anything on it's own. When half it's games are games I'd rather play elsewhere then the library kind of sucks. It's exclusives are made up of otaku waifu games that do not compel me. I'm not sure how it's nonsense. I own plenty of systems, so I like a system to actually have things that justify it compared to others. Playing ports are nice, but I could easily live without playing portable versions of them. When I can easily trade in and get rid of a system and not miss it's games, because I can play them everywhere else then the system's library kind of sucks.So if a game is multiplatform then it's not a real <console> game?
I mean, I can still understand someone who has other consoles and doesn't find multiplatforms to be compelling for a new hardware purchase, but saying that the library itself sucks because of multiplaforms, especially if you already own it, is kind of nonsense
If you're going to bring up "well the PS2 is losing a lot of it's games due to hd ports, does that mean the PS2 sucks now". No, because I'm talking about the here and now. Pretty much in every case, I'll pick the console version of a current game over the vita version, because I'd rather play the console version. Hence it's hard to justify the vita when it's library makes no real reason to own it.
