Jim E. Rossler
Banned
They're MY organs, and I need them NOWNEVER
That's the problem. Someone can say "hey we could use this liver right now" and suddenly I'm declared braindead. I'm not saying that's the norm, but to insinuate it hasn't or doesn't happen seems kind of silly. You're willing to accept that risk? That's great. I'm not, at least not right now.You're missing the point... you are already brain dead or at least declared as such.
What the hell are you talking about?
To the people who look down on non-donors: if you needed an organ transplant, would you be willing to make someone suffer through being dissected without anesthesia to get it? If so, why do you deserve that?
That's the problem. Someone can say "hey we could use this liver right now" and suddenly I'm declared braindead. I'm not saying that's the norm, but to insinuate it hasn't or doesn't happen seems kind of silly. You're willing to accept that risk? That's great. I'm not, at least not right now.
What the hell are you talking about?
It might be selfish, but I think it's absurd to look down on people for it.Can you explain how it isn't selfish?
Only organ donors are allowed to receive organs from donors.
Would anyone oppose such a law?
Maybe I am that dense. Enlighten me.You're joking right? You can't be this dense.
I know reading is difficult, but I have faith in you, beast786. Give that OP another crack.What the hell are you talking about?
How selfless of you.If they were braindead yes I would. I'd do the same for them too. Braindead=dead as far as I'm concerned and I'd rather my family take my off life support than hang onto hope for the impossible.
Only organ donors are allowed to receive organs from donors.
Would anyone oppose such a law?
I think he's talking about the donor being harvested. Why you would need to anesthitize a patient with a flatlined EEG is beyond me, but I heard that some places actually do it "just in case"
There is nothing selfish about wanting to stay alive. Implicating that physicians are potentially miss-identifying patients as brain dead is scary stuff. I don't want to get in a bad car accident and miss out on the chance to see my son graduate high school because my license says "yes".
But BHCs—who don't receive anesthetics during an organ harvest operation—react to the scalpel like inadequately anesthetized live patients, exhibiting high blood pressure and sometimes soaring heart rates. Doctors say these are simply reflexes.
I know reading is difficult, but I have faith in you, beast786. Give that OP another crack.How selfless of you.
edit: for the record, I've got the "Y" on my license and am far too lazy to even consider getting it changed. I'm not trying to justify my own refusal to donate.
What the hell are you talking about?
But BHCs—who don't receive anesthetics during an organ harvest operation—react to the scalpel like inadequately anesthetized live patients, exhibiting high blood pressure and sometimes soaring heart rates. Doctors say these are simply reflexes.
Apparently not if you had to ask what I was talking about.http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=35941240&postcount=91
I think I know a little bit more than you think.
More specifically, this:I'm pretty sure he's talking about this.
In a 1999 article in the peer-reviewed journal Anesthesiology, Gail A. Van Norman, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of Washington, reported a case in which a 30-year-old patient with severe head trauma began breathing spontaneously after being declared brain dead. The physicians said that, because there was no chance of recovery, he could still be considered dead. The harvest proceeded over the objections of the anesthesiologist, who saw the donor move, and then react to the scalpel with hypertension.
Apparently not if you had to ask what I was talking about.
More specifically, this:
I never claimed it's the only scenario or that it's even common. But according to the article, it's possible, and I'm not so arrogant as to demand that of someone.I'm pretty sure you're just trolling by now. How you can't understand by you just stating that as a scenario like it's the only scenario or at least highly, highly prevalent (of which neither is true) is misleading at best.
Only organ donors are allowed to receive organs from donors.
Would anyone oppose such a law?
How do you feel about having them cut you open and dissect you without anesthesia while you can still feel it, but have no way to protest? Because according to the article, that happens.
I never claimed it's the only scenario or that it's even common. But according to the article, it's possible, and I'm not so arrogant as to demand that of someone.
Ok, so the astronomical percentage that it happens is highly justifiable like the article suggests? How can you call that anything less than fear mongering?
Since apparently you just like to quote my posts and then talk about something that has nothing to do with what I said, I'll just leave this here for you. Enjoy.Ok, so the astronomical percentage that it happens is highly justifiable like the article suggests? How can you call that anything less than fear mongering?
If my higher functions are gone, that is death. What am I without the ability to think or feel emotion? Pain is just nerve endings firing, there's nothing to process in my head. I'm not dreaming or feeling anything. At that point, I'm just gone and what's left of me is twitching.
Apparently not if you had to ask what I was talking about.
More specifically, this:
I never claimed it's the only scenario or that it's even common. But according to the article, it's possible, and I'm not so arrogant as to demand that of someone.
But but death panels. Doctors find out if you're dead by splashing water on you! Such quacks!
buy guize my mom heard for some women on an aol message board that they won't save you if your a organ donor
Worked in SICU for a while. Declared many times.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...JXq7lC&sig=AHIEtbSDI1GcKUihbl78neGwn0G6KEcj3w
Pretty much the same protocol on the link above ^. Also, participated in during donation extraction surgeries.
I can give tons of stories of lives saving by donors.
I recall one night we had a S/P of MVA with two victims. A mother and her 10 month baby child. The infant was send to children hospital, while the mother was under our care. Just minute upon arrival i had her declared dead. During that time we received a call from children hospital that infant had an irreversible liver injury. Kept the mother alive, got the transplant team to extract the liver from the mother and helicopter it to the children hospital. Where the infant was saved.
In general the transplant list has criterias. Ie if you need liver transplant they take your age, quality of life etc when they make a list. Its not just first come and serve.
If my organs can help someone , I am all for it.
Just one life, bro. One. You don't get a second. No one does.
Since apparently you just like to quote my posts and then talk about something that has nothing to do with what I said, I'll just leave this here for you. Enjoy.
First, welcome to 2012. 13 years in medical science is a lifetime. Things have changed and our protocol has changed.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/723342
Did you see what I bolded? has nothing to do with your response.
Same here. I'll donate, but I wont waste energy trying to convince another person that they should do something with their body... because again, we could all be doing things to make the world better and we don't for similarly silly reasons.
We could all be saving a fucking life right now if we wanted to.
You bolded a reference I made to the OP's article, then asked what I was talking about. I'm not sure what you're on about.First, welcome to 2012. 13 years in medical science is a lifetime. Things have changed and our protocol has changed.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/723342
Did you see what I bolded? has nothing to do with your response.
I wish there was a statistic on this. I can't imagine anyone not becoming a donor after he's been saved by one.Well, it's not like most people would have their babies signed up to be organ donors, but if you are willing to accept an organ from someone else (as an adult), the only decent thing to do is become a donor yourself.
Interesting. What kind of criteria are used to determine who gets the organs? I might be being irrational, but something sits uneasily with me about prioritizing young lives over old lives or the lives of the able-bodied over the lives of the disabled.
That directly contradicts Beast's post.
Everyone is on a list. They go down the list from the top, find a match, that person gets the organs.
The only shortcut I know of is if you're related to the donator or if you know someone in person that matches and is willing to donate.
In general the transplant list has criterias. Ie if you need liver transplant they take your age, quality of life etc when they make a list. Its not just first come and serve.
Yes, but most have a problem with this since you have to do nothing but check a box. Most other ways to save lives involve more than that.
Your brain dies about 5 minutes after your heart stops IIRC.So if your brain dead, your considered dead dead? I never really thought about this before...I know your brain tells everything else what to do, through the nervous system I believe,. So if those two things stop then theres no communication which means no feeling. I just always assumed that once your heart stopped working you was dead.
In other words, I'm a donor and if you're afraid of being a donor I won't look down or judge you, but I will call you a pussy.
Different strokes. Not my job to sort it out. Not my organs.
I don't think anyone here is arguing, that if you fail that test and you're brain dead, they'd want to be kept in that state with the hope of recovering
What they're saying is if they're brain dead, they'd rather just be taken off support, have all heart functions end, and be a 100% cold dead corpse instead of the low possibility of being brain dead and still feeling something as they're body is cut open and harvested.
I don't believe the article myself, but just trying to clear that up.
So if your brain dead, your considered dead dead? I never really thought about this before...I know your brain tells everything else what to do, through the nervous system I believe,. So if those two things stop then theres no communication which means no feeling. I just always assumed that once your heart stopped working you was dead.
All I'm saying is that what someone does with their organs is their business. If I can't get an organ transplant because some dude doesn't want to donate because of the fear that he'll be euthanized or because he wants each of his organs placed in individual ceramic jars shaped like Peanuts characters and buried in separate countries, then I won't really give a damn.Why not enlighten me?