To me "Black Lives Matter" is a reasonable statement. It's like the most non-threatening rallying cry in history.
However the response to this phrase has been so violent and ugly.
Every since the inception of the Black Lives Matter campaign, there's been this large scale coordinated effort to demonize and suppress this non-violent movement.
So, my question is why?
Why is the idea that black people's lives actually hold some value, such a "radical" idea?
Why is it a dangerous idea?
Whose lives does it negatively effect if we treat a group of people...like people?
Honestly it infuriates me that it's 2016 and we're STILL- WE'RE FUCKING STILL debating whether or not black people deserve to die.
Fuck
I think there's a bit of a disconnect between what people who have a problem with BLM think they're disagreeing with, and what it sounds like you think they disagree with.
I think that, outright white supremacists aside, most of the people who say "All Lives Matter" or even "Blue Lives Matter" would consciously agree with concepts like "it is just as sad when a black person is killed as when a white person is killed" or "deliberately taking a life is equally bad regardless of the race of that person," and I think if you set up a philosophical thought problem about it they would agree that black and white lives have equal moral weights. That is, they would agree with all the underlying things that you would expect anyone who believes that black lives matter to agree with.
So why don't they agree with a phrase that neatly encompasses those ideas under a simple banner? Mostly it's that the phrase connotes a whole bunch of additional ideas, which they have political disagreements with. Imagine a conversation where someone says "hey, black lives matter." And the other person says "yes, I agree, we do need to do something about police violence against black people." Well hang on, where did that come from? It came from the political movement that goes along with the slogan. "Occupy Wall Street" doesn't just mean people going and sitting around on Wall Street, it includes a bunch of ideas about what's wrong with the world we live in and how to fix it. Ditto BLM.
Now, the reasons why people disagree with the political movement will probably include stuff like white fragility or underlying racism or outright denial of major problems in society to do with systemic racism, so criticism isn't unwarranted. But I don't think it should be confusing why conservatives might not be willing to say "black lives matter." It's not that they disagree with that statement, it's that they disagree with the political ideas that are tied to it. (Similarly, if someone asked me to say "all lives matter," I'd be uncomfortable with the politics of it even though I obviously agree with the surface-level statement.)